10.07.2015 Views

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction7. projection of a climate-sensitive 'impact' variable;8. identification of adaptation needs.Different types of statements are subject to differentsources of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. As a general rule, the(sources of) uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>fr</strong>om observationsto attributions <strong>and</strong> projections, <strong>and</strong> <strong>fr</strong>om climatevariables to climate <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> adaptation needs(see Figure 1.1). For example, observations of aclimate or climate impact variably (numbers 1<strong>and</strong> 4 above) can be made for short time serieswhereas statements about statistically significanttrends (numbers 2 <strong>and</strong> 5 above) require longer timeseries <strong>and</strong> the consideration of natural <strong>in</strong>terannualvariability. With respect to projections, the futuretrajectory of GHG emissions is a relevant sourceof uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty for long-term climate <strong>and</strong> climateimpact projections but not for observations of thepast. Also, near-term projections (e.g. up to 30 years)show limited sensitivity to future GHG emissionsscenarios due to the long residence time of mostGHGs <strong>and</strong> the large thermal <strong>in</strong>ertia of the climatesystem.Key messages are formulated so that it is clearwhat type of statement they make. Note that thetype of statement supported by a particular datasetmay depend on the spatial scale. For example, asignificant climate trend may be detectable at thecont<strong>in</strong>ental scale (where year-to-year variabilityis low) but not <strong>in</strong> each region (where year-to-yearvariability is higher <strong>and</strong> regional factors may beimportant). For the sake of clarity, the comb<strong>in</strong>ationof different types of statements <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle messageis generally avoided.Appropriate choice of the level of precisionIt is useful to consider several different levels ofprecision (or quantification) <strong>in</strong> key messages, whichare ordered here <strong>fr</strong>om least to most precise (see alsothe IPCC uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty guidance (IPCC, 2005):1. existence of effect (but the direction isambiguous or unpredictable);2. direction of <strong>change</strong> or trend;3. order of magnitude of a <strong>change</strong> (e.g. <strong>in</strong>dicatedby a semi-quantitative verbal statement);4. range or confidence <strong>in</strong>terval;5. s<strong>in</strong>gle value (imply<strong>in</strong>g confidence <strong>in</strong> allsignificant digits).Figure 1.1Cascade of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>in</strong> climate impact assessments? ? ? ?EmissionscenariosCarbon cycleresponseGlobal climatesensitivityRegional cliamte<strong>change</strong> scenariosRange ofpossible <strong>impacts</strong>Note:The length of the bars represents the magnitude of the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty.Source: Ahmad et al., 2007, figure 2–2.44 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!