Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr
Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr
Vulnerability to climate change5.5 Damage costsThe first part of this section presents observedtrends in weather and climate-related events andthe economic losses associated with them. Whilethese events have been influenced by global climatechange, it is not generally possible to attributespecific events or observed trends to global climatechange. The second part presents results of theClimateCost project, which estimates economic costsof climate change in Europe for different emissionsscenarios.5.5.1 Damages from weather and climate-relatedeventsRelevanceEconomic losses from weather- and climate-relateddisasters have increased, but with large spatialand interannual variability. Global weather- andclimate-related disaster losses reported over thelast few decades reflect mainly monetised directdamages to assets, and are unequally distributed.Loss estimates are lower-bound estimates becausemany impacts, such as loss of human lives, culturalheritage and ecosystems services, are difficultto value and monetise, and thus they are poorlyreflected in estimates of losses. Economic, includinginsured, disaster losses associated with weather,climate and geophysical events are higher indeveloped countries. Fatality rates and economiclosses expressed as a proportion of GDP are higherin developing countries (IPCC, 2012).Europe is experiencing an increasing number ofhydro-meteorological, geophysical and technologicaldisasters that are caused by a combination ofchanges in its physical, technological and human/social systems. The potential for a hazard to causea disaster mainly depends on how vulnerable anexposed community is to such hazards. Actionsand measures, if well implemented, can reduce thehuman health and economic impact of a hazardousevent. In recent years, policies for disaster riskreduction and management have shifted to acomprehensive, integrated risk approach. The fulldisaster cycle — prevention, preparedness, responseand recovery — should be taken into consideration(EEA, 2011). Adaptation to climate change anddisaster risk management provide a range ofcomplementary approaches for managing the risksof climate extremes and disasters (IPCC, 2012).Uncertainties and data gapsInformation for Europe can be extracted from twoglobal disaster databases, namely the EM‐DATdatabase maintained by CRED ( 77 ) (see alsoSection 4.4) that places a particular focus on humanfatalities and displaced and affected people, and theNatCatSERVICE database (NatCatSERVICE, 2012)maintained by Munich RE that provides data oninsured and overall losses. The 'disaster thresholds'for an event to be included in these global databasesare as follows:• EM-DAT: 10 or more people killed and/or 100 ormore people affected and/or declaration of astate of emergency and/or call for internationalassistance;Key messages: 5.5.1 Damages from weather and climate-related events• Hydro-meteorological events (storms, floods, and landslides) account for 64 % of the reported damagesdue to natural disasters in Europe since 1980; climatological events (extreme temperatures; droughtsand forest fires) account for another 20 %.• Overall damages from extreme weather events have increased from EUR 9 billion in the 1980s to morethan EUR 13 billion in the 2000s (inflation-corrected).• The observed damage increase is primarily due to increases in population, economic wealth and humanactivities in hazard-prone areas and to better reporting.• It is currently difficult to determine accurately the proportion of damage costs that are attributableto climate change. The contribution of climate change to the damage costs from natural disasters isexpected to increase due to the projected changes in the intensity and frequency of extreme weatherevents.( 77 ) See http://www.emdat.be.228 Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012
Vulnerability to climate change• NatCatSERVICE: Small-scale property damageand/or one fatality. Additionally, Munich REuses different classes to classify the events.Over recent years these global databases havebeen harmonised, although some differencesremain. During the past decades both databaseshave improved their reporting which means thatcaution is needed in formulating conclusions abouttrends. In addition, both databases are less suitablefor analysing the impacts of smaller events or foranalyses at the sub-national level. However, despitethese considerations both databases serve as a goodstarting point for getting an overview of the impactand damage costs of disasters in Europe.Past trendsAccording to the (NatCatSERVICE, 2012) of MunichRE, the number of reported natural disasters inEEA member countries shows an upward trendsince 1980 (see Figure 5.3). Whereas the numberand impacts of weather and climate-related eventsincreased considerably between 1980 and 2011, thenumber of geophysical hazards remained morestable. Hydro-meteorological events (storms, floods,and landslides) account for about 75 % of naturaldisasters that have occurred in Europe since 1980and around 64 % of the reported damage costs;climatological events (extreme temperatures;droughts and forest fires) account for another16 % of the disasters and 20 % of the damage costs(NatCatSERVICE, 2012).Figure 5.3 Natural disasters in EEA member countries (1980–2011)Number of events300250200150100501980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010Geophysical events (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic eruption)Hydrological events (flood, mass movement)Climatological events (heat wave)Meteorological events (storm)Climatological events (cold wave, drought, forest fire)Linear trend (all events)4 810 loss events *1 % 9 %15 %67 %109 213 fatalities23 %Overall losses EUR 455 bn(454 874.94)14 %6 %16 %Insured losses ** EUR 126 bn(126 315.61)1 %6 % 1 %28 %4 %31 %44 %4 %2 %31 %33 %64 %Geophysical events (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic eruption)Hydrological events (flood, mass movement)Climatological events (heat wave)Meteorological events (storm)Climatological events (cold wave, drought, forest fire)Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012229
- Page 180 and 181: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 182 and 183: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 184 and 185: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 186 and 187: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 188 and 189: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 190 and 191: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 192 and 193: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 194 and 195: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 196 and 197: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 198 and 199: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 200 and 201: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 202 and 203: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 204 and 205: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 206 and 207: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 208 and 209: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 210 and 211: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 212 and 213: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 214 and 215: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 216 and 217: Vulnerability to climate changein f
- Page 218 and 219: Vulnerability to climate change5.3
- Page 220 and 221: Vulnerability to climate changeMap
- Page 222 and 223: Vulnerability to climate changeasse
- Page 224 and 225: Vulnerability to climate change5.3.
- Page 226 and 227: Vulnerability to climate changeBox
- Page 228 and 229: Vulnerability to climate changeMap
- Page 232 and 233: Vulnerability to climate changeFigu
- Page 234 and 235: Vulnerability to climate changeFigu
- Page 236 and 237: Vulnerability to climate changeFina
- Page 238 and 239: Vulnerability to climate changefact
- Page 240 and 241: Indicator and data needsA key polic
- Page 242 and 243: Indicator and data needsWEI and res
- Page 244 and 245: Indicator and data needsDirectorate
- Page 246 and 247: Indicator and data needs6.2.2 Globa
- Page 248 and 249: Abbreviations and acronyms7 Abbrevi
- Page 250 and 251: Abbreviations and acronymsAcronym o
- Page 252 and 253: Abbreviations and acronymsAcronym o
- Page 254 and 255: Abbreviations and acronymsProject a
- Page 256 and 257: Referenceset al. (2010) DEMIFER: De
- Page 258 and 259: ReferencesNovember to 11 December 2
- Page 260 and 261: ReferencesEEA (2011a) Mapping the i
- Page 262 and 263: References19 December 2009. UNFCCC,
- Page 264 and 265: ReferencesIsaksen, K., Sollid, J. L
- Page 266 and 267: Referencesfür Hydrologie und Limno
- Page 268 and 269: Referencescirculation models. Journ
- Page 270 and 271: Referencesin Geophysics 32(4-5), 58
- Page 272 and 273: ReferencesVermeer, M. and Rahmstorf
- Page 274 and 275: ReferencesDevelopment. http://ec.eu
- Page 276 and 277: ReferencesMooij, W. M., Hulsmann, S
- Page 278 and 279: ReferencesAraújo, M. B., Thuiller,
Vulnerability to climate <strong>change</strong>5.5 Damage costsThe first part of this section presents observedtrends <strong>in</strong> weather <strong>and</strong> climate-related events <strong>and</strong>the economic losses associated with them. Whilethese events have been <strong>in</strong>fluenced by global climate<strong>change</strong>, it is not generally possible to attributespecific events or observed trends to global climate<strong>change</strong>. The second part presents results of the<strong>Climate</strong>Cost project, which estimates economic costsof climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> for different emissionsscenarios.5.5.1 Damages <strong>fr</strong>om weather <strong>and</strong> climate-relatedeventsRelevanceEconomic losses <strong>fr</strong>om weather- <strong>and</strong> climate-relateddisasters have <strong>in</strong>creased, but with large spatial<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terannual variability. Global weather- <strong>and</strong>climate-related disaster losses reported over thelast few decades reflect ma<strong>in</strong>ly monetised directdamages to assets, <strong>and</strong> are unequally distributed.Loss estimates are lower-bound estimates becausemany <strong>impacts</strong>, such as loss of human lives, culturalheritage <strong>and</strong> ecosystems services, are difficultto value <strong>and</strong> monetise, <strong>and</strong> thus they are poorlyreflected <strong>in</strong> estimates of losses. Economic, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>sured, disaster losses associated with weather,climate <strong>and</strong> geophysical events are higher <strong>in</strong>developed countries. Fatality rates <strong>and</strong> economiclosses expressed as a proportion of GDP are higher<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries (IPCC, 2012).<strong>Europe</strong> is experienc<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number ofhydro-meteorological, geophysical <strong>and</strong> technologicaldisasters that are caused by a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of<strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> its physical, technological <strong>and</strong> human/social systems. The potential for a hazard to causea disaster ma<strong>in</strong>ly depends on how vulnerable anexposed community is to such hazards. Actions<strong>and</strong> measures, if well implemented, can reduce thehuman health <strong>and</strong> economic impact of a hazardousevent. In recent years, policies for disaster riskreduction <strong>and</strong> management have shifted to acomprehensive, <strong>in</strong>tegrated risk approach. The fulldisaster cycle — prevention, preparedness, response<strong>and</strong> recovery — should be taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration(EEA, 2011). Adaptation to climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong>disaster risk management provide a range ofcomplementary approaches for manag<strong>in</strong>g the risksof climate extremes <strong>and</strong> disasters (IPCC, 2012).Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties <strong>and</strong> data gapsInformation for <strong>Europe</strong> can be extracted <strong>fr</strong>om twoglobal disaster databases, namely the EM‐DATdatabase ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by CRED ( 77 ) (see alsoSection 4.4) that places a particular focus on humanfatalities <strong>and</strong> displaced <strong>and</strong> affected people, <strong>and</strong> theNatCatSERVICE database (NatCatSERVICE, 2012)ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by Munich RE that provides data on<strong>in</strong>sured <strong>and</strong> overall losses. The 'disaster thresholds'for an event to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> these global databasesare as follows:• EM-DAT: 10 or more people killed <strong>and</strong>/or 100 ormore people affected <strong>and</strong>/or declaration of astate of emergency <strong>and</strong>/or call for <strong>in</strong>ternationalassistance;Key messages: 5.5.1 Damages <strong>fr</strong>om weather <strong>and</strong> climate-related events• Hydro-meteorological events (storms, floods, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slides) account for 64 % of the reported damagesdue to natural disasters <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce 1980; climatological events (extreme temperatures; droughts<strong>and</strong> forest fires) account for another 20 %.• Overall damages <strong>fr</strong>om extreme weather events have <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>fr</strong>om EUR 9 billion <strong>in</strong> the 1980s to morethan EUR 13 billion <strong>in</strong> the 2000s (<strong>in</strong>flation-corrected).• The observed damage <strong>in</strong>crease is primarily due to <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> population, economic wealth <strong>and</strong> humanactivities <strong>in</strong> hazard-prone areas <strong>and</strong> to better report<strong>in</strong>g.• It is currently difficult to determ<strong>in</strong>e accurately the proportion of damage costs that are attributableto climate <strong>change</strong>. The contribution of climate <strong>change</strong> to the damage costs <strong>fr</strong>om natural disasters isexpected to <strong>in</strong>crease due to the projected <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tensity <strong>and</strong> <strong>fr</strong>equency of extreme weatherevents.( 77 ) See http://www.emdat.be.228 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> 2012