Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

10.07.2015 Views

Vulnerability to climate changein flood‐prone areas as well as climate change.However, it is difficult to detangle the specificeffect of climate change on these economic lossesfrom floods (Feyen et al., 2011). So the observationsprovide no conclusive and general proof on howclimate change affects flood risks. Also, the effect offlood protection measures is not unambiguous. Forexample, dikes are taken as a safety guarantee bypopulations living in flood-prone areas. Thus, theremay be incentives to build in these flood-prone areasand thus damage potential may have grown morethan if no or fewer measures would have been taken.Thus, damages when such an area was flooded mayhave been higher than in the case of less or no floodprotection (Kundzewicz et al., 2010).Map 5.1 shows the affected population and grossvalue added (GVA) affected by floods for the 2050sfor the 'Economy First' scenario, taking into accountboth climate change and socio‐economic changes.Economy First is a scenario where a globalisedand liberalised economy pushes the use of allavailable energy sources and an intensificationof agriculture where profitable. The adoption ofnew technologies and water-saving consciousnessare low and thus, water use increases. Only waterecosystems providing ecological goods and servicesfor economies are preserved and improved. Forthis Economy First scenario, for many parts ofEurope the GVA affected by floods for the 2050s islarger than for the baseline scenario. Differencesin the affected population are estimated to besmall. The analysis also shows an uneven patternof vulnerability across Europe. Note that the mapsshow the absolute number of affected people or GVAin a region rather than the percentage of populationor GVA. It should also be noted that there are largedifferences in changes in projected flood frequencyand intensity between different climate models.Map 5.1Estimated number of people and gross value affected by 100-year flood events inthe 'Economy First' scenario for the 2050sa) b)Note:Number of people (a) and amount of manufacturing gross value added (GVA), (b) affected by 100-year flood events in the'Economy First' scenario for the 2050s. Calculations based on median ensemble results from LISFLOOD linked to populationprojections from SCENES scenarios.Source: Flörke, Wimmer, Cornelius, et al., 2011.214 Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012

Vulnerability to climate changeThe ClimWatAdapt project also prepared projectionsfor low flow and water stress. Map 5.2 showsannual water stress, which is calculated as theratio of water abstraction to availability for twoscenarios. Due to various uncertainties care shouldbe taken in interpreting these projections. Detailson the assumptions and models are available intheir final report (Flörke, Wimmer, Laaser, et al.,2011). In the Economy First scenario water stressshows a large increase for the 2050s across muchof Europe compared to the current situation. Theimplementation of a sustainable approach tothe management of Europe's water resources isinvestigated in a 'Sustainability First' scenario. Thisscenario sketches the transition from a globalising,market-oriented Europe to environmentalsustainability, where local initiatives are leading.A considerable reduction in annual water stress isprojected across much of Europe, compared to boththe Economy First scenario and the present daysituation (Flörke, Wimmer, Laaser, et al., 2011).Drought risks will increase throughout largeareas of the EU (see also Section 2.2.5), wherebysouthern Europe is the most vulnerable region inEurope. Increasing irrigation efficiency can reduceirrigation water withdrawals to some degree buttechnological changes will not be sufficient tosave southern Europe from water stress. Besidesagriculture, electricity production is vulnerableto climate change effects on river low flows andwater temperature for their cooling water (seeSection 4.5.3). However, the energy sector has ahigh potential to reduce water withdrawals throughtechnological improvements.Environmental flows, which are important forthe healthy maintenance of aquatic ecosystems,are threatened by climate change impactsand socio‐economic developments. Althougha Good Ecological Status is required by theWater Framework Directive (WFD), river basinmanagement plans currently do not consider climatechange impacts sufficiently and further coordinationbetween river basin management plans and droughtmanagement plans is preferable. Mandatory waterabstraction schemes are needed during low-flowperiods to protect ecosystems. Many river basinsare expected to be in the severe water stress class in2050. Competition for scarce water resources couldbe an ongoing source of tension between differentusers and in the case of transboundary river basinsbetween nations as well.Map 5.2Annual water stress for present conditions and projections for two scenariosPresent climate2050 projectionEconomy First scenario2050 projectionSustainability Eventually scenario60°60°50°50°50°40°40°40°0 500 1000 1500 km 20° 30° 40° 0 500 1000 1500 km 20° 30° 40° 0 500 1000 1500 km 20° 30° 40°Annual water stress for present conditions and projections for two scenariosLow Mild Severe Outside coverageNote: Left: present climate; middle: projection for 2050 based on Economy First scenario, median of general circulation models —regional climate models (GCM-RCM) combinations;right: projection for 2050 based on Sustainability Eventually scenario, median of GCM-RCM combinations.Yellow: low water stress (withdrawals-to-availability ratio: 0–0.2); orange: mild water stress (withdrawals-to-availabilityratio: 0.2–0.4), red: severe water stress (withdrawals-to-availability ratio: > 0.4).Source: Flörke, Wimmer, Laaser, et al., 2011.Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012215

Vulnerability to climate <strong>change</strong>The ClimWatAdapt project also prepared projectionsfor low flow <strong>and</strong> water stress. Map 5.2 showsannual water stress, which is calculated as theratio of water abstraction to availability for twoscenarios. Due to various uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties care shouldbe taken <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g these projections. Detailson the assumptions <strong>and</strong> models are available <strong>in</strong>their f<strong>in</strong>al report (Flörke, Wimmer, Laaser, et al.,2011). In the Economy First scenario water stressshows a large <strong>in</strong>crease for the 2050s across muchof <strong>Europe</strong> compared to the current situation. Theimplementation of a susta<strong>in</strong>able approach tothe management of <strong>Europe</strong>'s water resources is<strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>in</strong> a 'Susta<strong>in</strong>ability First' scenario. Thisscenario sketches the transition <strong>fr</strong>om a globalis<strong>in</strong>g,market-oriented <strong>Europe</strong> to environmentalsusta<strong>in</strong>ability, where local <strong>in</strong>itiatives are lead<strong>in</strong>g.A considerable reduction <strong>in</strong> annual water stress isprojected across much of <strong>Europe</strong>, compared to boththe Economy First scenario <strong>and</strong> the present daysituation (Flörke, Wimmer, Laaser, et al., 2011).Drought risks will <strong>in</strong>crease throughout largeareas of the EU (see also Section 2.2.5), wherebysouthern <strong>Europe</strong> is the most vulnerable region <strong>in</strong><strong>Europe</strong>. Increas<strong>in</strong>g irrigation efficiency can reduceirrigation water withdrawals to some degree buttechnological <strong>change</strong>s will not be sufficient tosave southern <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>fr</strong>om water stress. Besidesagriculture, electricity production is vulnerableto climate <strong>change</strong> effects on river low flows <strong>and</strong>water temperature for their cool<strong>in</strong>g water (seeSection 4.5.3). However, the energy sector has ahigh potential to reduce water withdrawals throughtechnological improvements.Environmental flows, which are important forthe healthy ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of aquatic ecosystems,are threatened by climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong><strong>and</strong> socio‐economic developments. Althougha Good Ecological Status is required by theWater Framework Directive (WFD), river bas<strong>in</strong>management plans currently do not consider climate<strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> sufficiently <strong>and</strong> further coord<strong>in</strong>ationbetween river bas<strong>in</strong> management plans <strong>and</strong> droughtmanagement plans is preferable. M<strong>and</strong>atory waterabstraction schemes are needed dur<strong>in</strong>g low-flowperiods to protect ecosystems. Many river bas<strong>in</strong>sare expected to be <strong>in</strong> the severe water stress class <strong>in</strong>2050. Competition for scarce water resources couldbe an ongo<strong>in</strong>g source of tension between differentusers <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the case of transboundary river bas<strong>in</strong>sbetween nations as well.Map 5.2Annual water stress for present conditions <strong>and</strong> projections for two scenariosPresent climate2050 projectionEconomy First scenario2050 projectionSusta<strong>in</strong>ability Eventually scenario60°60°50°50°50°40°40°40°0 500 1000 1500 km 20° 30° 40° 0 500 1000 1500 km 20° 30° 40° 0 500 1000 1500 km 20° 30° 40°Annual water stress for present conditions <strong>and</strong> projections for two scenariosLow Mild Severe Outside coverageNote: Left: present climate; middle: projection for 2050 based on Economy First scenario, median of general circulation models —regional climate models (GCM-RCM) comb<strong>in</strong>ations;right: projection for 2050 based on Susta<strong>in</strong>ability Eventually scenario, median of GCM-RCM comb<strong>in</strong>ations.Yellow: low water stress (withdrawals-to-availability ratio: 0–0.2); orange: mild water stress (withdrawals-to-availabilityratio: 0.2–0.4), red: severe water stress (withdrawals-to-availability ratio: > 0.4).Source: Flörke, Wimmer, Laaser, et al., 2011.<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> 2012215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!