10.07.2015 Views

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> on socio-economic systems <strong>and</strong> healthTable 4.4Overview of studies on future electricity dem<strong>and</strong> due to climate <strong>change</strong>Study Region Date ofprojection(Pilli-Sihvolaet al., 2010)(Mirasgediset al., 2007)(Eskel<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>Mideksa, 2010)(Mima et al.,2012)Germany, Spa<strong>in</strong>,France, theNetherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong>F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>Annual <strong>change</strong> <strong>in</strong> electricity dem<strong>and</strong>2015–2050 Decreases <strong>in</strong> northern countries, <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>;overall neutralPeakdem<strong>and</strong>+ 2 % to+ 4 %, Spa<strong>in</strong>Greece 2070–2100 + 3 % to + 6 % + 13 %, June<strong>Europe</strong> 2100 Small, but disguises large regional variations + 20 %,Turkey<strong>Europe</strong> 2010–2100 Increase of 12 % by 2050 ris<strong>in</strong>g to 24 % by 2100(EU‐27) due to electricity for cool<strong>in</strong>g dem<strong>and</strong> abovefuture basel<strong>in</strong>e (A1B scenario), reduced to 8 % acrossperiod for E1 mitigation scenario. Strong regionalvariations, with greater <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> southern <strong>Europe</strong>Fossil-powered <strong>and</strong> nuclear electricity generatorsare sensitive to a reduced availability <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creasedtemperature of cool<strong>in</strong>g water, <strong>and</strong> to <strong>in</strong>creased airtemperature, which reduces their efficiency (WorldBank, 2011, p. 33). Nuclear plants are particularlysusceptible <strong>in</strong> this regard (L<strong>in</strong>nerud et al., 2011;Rübbelke <strong>and</strong> Vögele, 2011).The literature on <strong>change</strong> <strong>in</strong> output <strong>fr</strong>om electricitygenerators due to climate <strong>change</strong> is rather sparse.Considerable reductions <strong>in</strong> river flow dur<strong>in</strong>g the2004–2005 drought across the Iberian Pen<strong>in</strong>sula,resulted <strong>in</strong> a 40 % drop <strong>in</strong> hydroelectric powerproduction, which had to be replaced by electricity<strong>fr</strong>om thermoelectric power plants (García-Herreraet al., 2007). Similarly <strong>in</strong> 2005, Portugal had tocompensate for low hydro-electrical production byus<strong>in</strong>g fossil fuel worth EUR 182 million, with anadditional expense of EUR 28 million to purchaseCO 2emissions licenses. The total cost was f<strong>in</strong>allyestimated at EUR 883 million, equivalent to 0.6 % ofGDP (Demuth, 2009).A recent study estimated <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the capacityof thermoelectric power plants <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> due to<strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> temperature <strong>and</strong> river flow based on amulti-model GCM ensemble (Vliet et al., 2012). Thisstudy projects decreases <strong>in</strong> the capacity of powerplants due to climate <strong>change</strong> by 6–19 % <strong>in</strong> the 2040s,compared to the 1980s control period depend<strong>in</strong>gon cool<strong>in</strong>g system type <strong>and</strong> climate scenario.Increases are projected for most of Sc<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>avia <strong>and</strong>decreases for the rest of <strong>Europe</strong>. A study exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthe <strong>impacts</strong> of climate <strong>change</strong> on hydropower <strong>and</strong>nuclear electricity output identified Austria, France<strong>and</strong> Switzerl<strong>and</strong> as particularly vulnerable countries(Rübbelke <strong>and</strong> Vögele, 2011, p. 14).The conclusions <strong>fr</strong>om the stress test applied to<strong>Europe</strong>an nuclear power plants <strong>in</strong> the aftermathof the Fukushima accident, with respect to theadequacy of preparedness of these plants <strong>in</strong> theevent of natural hazards (earthquakes, flood<strong>in</strong>g)<strong>and</strong> extreme weather events were that furtherimprovements can be made, particularly <strong>in</strong> thecase of preparedness for extreme weather events(EC, 2011; ENSREG, 2012). The International AtomicEnergy Agency (IAEA) has developed guidel<strong>in</strong>esthat represent good practice to <strong>in</strong>crease robustnessaga<strong>in</strong>st natural hazards <strong>and</strong> extreme events thatare expected to be implemented <strong>in</strong> a number of<strong>Europe</strong>an countries as a result of the stress test(IAEA, 2011). Renewable electricity generatorsare most susceptible to <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> precipitationwhich affect the output of hydropower plants, <strong>and</strong>potentially to extreme storm gusts which mightdamage w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es. The performance of solarphotovoltaic modules is also reduced <strong>in</strong> hot weather.The ClimWatAdapt project assessed <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong>seasonal water availability as a proxy for risks tohydropower potential, with the largest reductionsshown <strong>in</strong> many regions of southern <strong>Europe</strong>.However, the study could not quantify the risksto electricity production because it did not <strong>in</strong>clude<strong>in</strong>formation on dams, reservoirs <strong>and</strong> hydropowerstations (Flörke et al., 2011). A study by theDirectorate-General for Energy (DG ENER) assessedadaptation costs for nuclear power stations <strong>and</strong>other energy <strong>in</strong><strong>fr</strong>astructure based on stakeholderconsultation (Rademaekers et al., 2011).The United K<strong>in</strong>gdom has performed a national‐levelclimate <strong>change</strong> risk assessment of the energy sector(see Box 4.2). In addition, several localised studiesassessed potential climate <strong>change</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> on<strong>in</strong>dividual power stations or water catchments.204 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!