Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr
Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr
Climate impacts on socio-economic systems and health4.1.3 AgrophenologyRelevanceChanges in crop phenology provide importantevidence of responses to recent regional climatechange (Menzel et al., 2003). Although phenologicalchanges are often influenced by managementpractices, in particular sowing date and choiceof cultivar, recent warming in Europe has clearlyadvanced a significant part of the agriculturalcalendar. Specific stages of growth (e.g. flowering,grain filling) are particularly sensitive to weatherconditions and critical for final yield. The timingof the crop cycle (agrophenology) determinesthe productive success of the crop. In general, alonger crop cycle is strongly correlated with higheryields, since a longer cycle permits better use of theavailable thermal energy, solar radiation and waterresources.Past trendsChanges in the phenological phases of severalperennial crops in Europe, such as the advance in thestart of the growing season of fruit trees (2.3 days/10years), cherry tree blossom (2.0 days/10 years)and apple tree blossom (2.2 days/10 years), in linewith increases of up to 1.4 °C in mean annual airtemperature have been observed in Germany during1961–2000 (Chmielewski et al., 2004). Sowing orplanting dates of several agricultural crops havebeen advanced, for example by 5 days for potatoesin Finland (1965–1999), 10 days for maize and sugarbeet in Germany (1961–2000) and 20 days for maize inFrance (1974–2003) (IPCC, 2007).An analysis of the modelled flowering date forwinter wheat in Europe between 1975 and 2010shows a general and clear increasing trend, whichis most pronounced in north-western Europe(Map 4.2). In parts of Europe the modelled floweringdate has advanced by 0.3–0.5 days per year. Thismodelled advance in flowering date probablyexceeds what is observed in reality, as day lengthresponses in the plants and farmers' choices ofcultivars with longer growth duration will reducethis response.ProjectionsWith the projected warming of the climate inEurope, further reductions in the number of daysrequired for flowering in cereals and maturity maybe expected throughout Europe (Map 4.3). Themodelled changes in flowering dates in Map 4.3include the expected effects of changes in cultivarchoice on flowering and maturity dates. Sincemany plants (including cereals) in Europe requirelong days to flower, the effect of warming on dateof flowering is smaller than would otherwise beexpected. The flowering date for winter wheat isprojected to show the greatest advance in westernparts of Europe, but with a large uncertainty dueto uncertainty in the underlying climate changeprojections. The advance in maturity date is largerthan the advance in flowering date, leading to ashortening of the grain filling period, which willnegatively affect yields. An independent studywith a different phenology model and other climatechange projections found similar advances inflowering date for winter wheat for England andWales (14–16 days by 2050) (Semenov, 2009).Key messages: 4.1.3 Agrophenology• Flowering of several perennial crops has advanced by about two days per decade in recent decades.• Changes in timing of crop phenology are affecting crop production and the relative performance ofdifferent crop species and varieties.• The shortening of crop growth phases in many crops is expected to continue. The shortening of thegrain filling phase of cereals and oilseed crops can be particularly detrimental to yield.162 Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012
Climate impacts on socio-economic systems and healthMap 4.2 Change of flowering date for winter wheat (1975–2010)-30°-20°-10°0°10°20°30°40°50°60°70°Rate of change offlowering date forwinter wheat(1975–2010)Days/year60°< – 0.5– 0.5 to – 0.2– 0.2 to 0.250°0.2 to 0.5> 0.5No data50°Outside coverage40°40°0 500 0° 1000 150010°km20°30°40°Source: MARS/STAT database.Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012163
- Page 114 and 115: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 116 and 117: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 118 and 119: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 120: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 123 and 124: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 125 and 126: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 127 and 128: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 129 and 130: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 131 and 132: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 133 and 134: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 135 and 136: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 137 and 138: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 139: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 142 and 143: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 144 and 145: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 146 and 147: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 148 and 149: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 150 and 151: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 152 and 153: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 154 and 155: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 156 and 157: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 158 and 159: Climate impacts on environmental sy
- Page 160 and 161: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 162 and 163: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 166 and 167: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 168 and 169: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 170 and 171: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 172 and 173: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 174 and 175: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 176 and 177: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 178 and 179: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 180 and 181: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 182 and 183: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 184 and 185: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 186 and 187: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 188 and 189: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 190 and 191: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 192 and 193: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 194 and 195: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 196 and 197: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 198 and 199: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 200 and 201: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 202 and 203: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 204 and 205: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 206 and 207: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 208 and 209: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 210 and 211: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
- Page 212 and 213: Climate impacts on socio-economic s
<strong>Climate</strong> <strong>impacts</strong> on socio-economic systems <strong>and</strong> health4.1.3 AgrophenologyRelevanceChanges <strong>in</strong> crop phenology provide importantevidence of responses to recent regional climate<strong>change</strong> (Menzel et al., 2003). Although phenological<strong>change</strong>s are often <strong>in</strong>fluenced by managementpractices, <strong>in</strong> particular sow<strong>in</strong>g date <strong>and</strong> choiceof cultivar, recent warm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> has clearlyadvanced a significant part of the agriculturalcalendar. Specific stages of growth (e.g. flower<strong>in</strong>g,gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g) are particularly sensitive to weatherconditions <strong>and</strong> critical for f<strong>in</strong>al yield. The tim<strong>in</strong>gof the crop cycle (agrophenology) determ<strong>in</strong>esthe productive success of the crop. In general, alonger crop cycle is strongly correlated with higheryields, s<strong>in</strong>ce a longer cycle permits better use of theavailable thermal energy, solar radiation <strong>and</strong> waterresources.Past trendsChanges <strong>in</strong> the phenological phases of severalperennial crops <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>, such as the advance <strong>in</strong> thestart of the grow<strong>in</strong>g season of <strong>fr</strong>uit trees (2.3 days/10years), cherry tree blossom (2.0 days/10 years)<strong>and</strong> apple tree blossom (2.2 days/10 years), <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ewith <strong>in</strong>creases of up to 1.4 °C <strong>in</strong> mean annual airtemperature have been observed <strong>in</strong> Germany dur<strong>in</strong>g1961–2000 (Chmielewski et al., 2004). Sow<strong>in</strong>g orplant<strong>in</strong>g dates of several agricultural crops havebeen advanced, for example by 5 days for potatoes<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> (1965–1999), 10 days for maize <strong>and</strong> sugarbeet <strong>in</strong> Germany (1961–2000) <strong>and</strong> 20 days for maize <strong>in</strong>France (1974–2003) (IPCC, 2007).An analysis of the modelled flower<strong>in</strong>g date forw<strong>in</strong>ter wheat <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> between 1975 <strong>and</strong> 2010shows a general <strong>and</strong> clear <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trend, whichis most pronounced <strong>in</strong> north-western <strong>Europe</strong>(Map 4.2). In parts of <strong>Europe</strong> the modelled flower<strong>in</strong>gdate has advanced by 0.3–0.5 days per year. Thismodelled advance <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g date probablyexceeds what is observed <strong>in</strong> reality, as day lengthresponses <strong>in</strong> the plants <strong>and</strong> farmers' choices ofcultivars with longer growth duration will reducethis response.ProjectionsWith the projected warm<strong>in</strong>g of the climate <strong>in</strong><strong>Europe</strong>, further reductions <strong>in</strong> the number of daysrequired for flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cereals <strong>and</strong> maturity maybe expected throughout <strong>Europe</strong> (Map 4.3). Themodelled <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g dates <strong>in</strong> Map 4.3<strong>in</strong>clude the expected effects of <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> cultivarchoice on flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> maturity dates. S<strong>in</strong>cemany plants (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cereals) <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> requirelong days to flower, the effect of warm<strong>in</strong>g on dateof flower<strong>in</strong>g is smaller than would otherwise beexpected. The flower<strong>in</strong>g date for w<strong>in</strong>ter wheat isprojected to show the greatest advance <strong>in</strong> westernparts of <strong>Europe</strong>, but with a large uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty dueto uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>g climate <strong>change</strong>projections. The advance <strong>in</strong> maturity date is largerthan the advance <strong>in</strong> flower<strong>in</strong>g date, lead<strong>in</strong>g to ashorten<strong>in</strong>g of the gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g period, which willnegatively affect yields. An <strong>in</strong>dependent studywith a different phenology model <strong>and</strong> other climate<strong>change</strong> projections found similar advances <strong>in</strong>flower<strong>in</strong>g date for w<strong>in</strong>ter wheat for Engl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>Wales (14–16 days by 2050) (Semenov, 2009).Key messages: 4.1.3 Agrophenology• Flower<strong>in</strong>g of several perennial crops has advanced by about two days per decade <strong>in</strong> recent decades.• Changes <strong>in</strong> tim<strong>in</strong>g of crop phenology are affect<strong>in</strong>g crop production <strong>and</strong> the relative performance ofdifferent crop species <strong>and</strong> varieties.• The shorten<strong>in</strong>g of crop growth phases <strong>in</strong> many crops is expected to cont<strong>in</strong>ue. The shorten<strong>in</strong>g of thegra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g phase of cereals <strong>and</strong> oilseed crops can be particularly detrimental to yield.162 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> 2012