10.07.2015 Views

Guide for Developing Assessment Tools - National Skills Standards ...

Guide for Developing Assessment Tools - National Skills Standards ...

Guide for Developing Assessment Tools - National Skills Standards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NQC | <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>for</strong> developing assessment toolsComponent Feature Generic applicationcompetence of the candidate would need to be documented(e.g. do all items have to be observed by the assessor?). The<strong>for</strong>m should also provide the opportunity <strong>for</strong> the observer torecord that s/he has not had the opportunity to observe thecandidate applying these skills and knowledge. Again,instructions on how to treat not observed items on the checklistwould need to be included within the tool. The <strong>for</strong>m should alsobe designed to record the number of instances and/or period ofobservation (this will help determine the level of sufficiency ofthe evidence to be collected), as well as the signature of theobserver; and the date of observation(s) (to authenticate theevidence and to determine the level of currency).Range and Outlines any restriction or Assessors need to provide the necessary materials to theconditions specific conditions <strong>for</strong> the candidate, as well as explain or clarify any concerns/questions.assessment such as the The period of observation should be communicated to thelocation, time restrictions, observer and candidate and this would need to be negotiatedassessor qualifications etc. and agreed to by workplace colleagues, to minimiseinterruptions to the everyday activities and functions of theworkplace environment.Materials/ Describes access to The tool should also specify the materials required to record theresources materials, equipment etc that candidate’s per<strong>for</strong>mance. For example:required may be required to per<strong>for</strong>m A copy of the Unit(s) of Competency;the task.The Observation Form;Pencil/paper; andVideo camera.In addition, any specific equipment required by the candidate toper<strong>for</strong>m the demonstration and/or simulation should bespecified.Assessor Defines the amount (if any) of In cases where observations are to be made by an internal staffintervention support provided member and are to be unannounced, the candidate needs to bewarned that s/he will be observed over a period of time <strong>for</strong>purposes of <strong>for</strong>mal assessment against the Unit(s) ofCompetency. If the observer is external to the workplace (e.g.teacher or trainer), s/he will need to ensure that the time anddate of the visit to the candidate’s workplace is confirmed andagreed to by the candidate and the workplace manager. Theexternal observer will need to in<strong>for</strong>m the candidate and his/herimmediate supervisor of his/her presence on the worksite assoon as possible. At all times, the external observer will need toavoid hindering the activities of the workplace.Reasonable <strong>Guide</strong>lines <strong>for</strong> making If the candidate does not have access to the workplace, thenadjustments reasonable adjustments to suitable examples of simulated activities may be used. Thisthe way in which evidence of section would outline any requirements and/or conditions <strong>for</strong>per<strong>for</strong>mance is gathered the simulated activity.without altering the expectedper<strong>for</strong>mance standardsValidity Evidence of validity should be Evidence of the validity of the observation tool may include:included to support the use of Detailed mapping of the Observation Form with the Unit(s)the assessment evidence <strong>for</strong> of Competency (content validity);the defined purpose andDirect relevance and/or use within a workplace settingtarget group of the tool.(face validity);A report of the outcomes of the panelling exercise withsubject matter experts (face and content validity);Observing a variety of per<strong>for</strong>mance over time (predictivevalidity);The tool clearly specifying the purpose of the tool, thetarget population, the evidence to be collected, decisionmaking rules, reporting requirements as well as theboundaries and limitations of the tool (consequentialvalidity); andEvidence of how the literacy and numeracy requirementsof the Unit(s) of Competency have been adhered to(construct validity).Reliability Evidence of the reliability of Evidence of the reliability of the observation tool may include:the tool should be included. Detailed evidence criteria <strong>for</strong> each aspect of per<strong>for</strong>manceto be observed (inter-rater reliability); andRecording sheet to record observations in a timely manner(intra-rater reliability).GUIDE FOR DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS PAGE 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!