Download - Transcrime - Università degli Studi di Trento

Annex B2 Procedural activity37. What was the effect, also on investigations, of the recent provision in article195 of the criminal procedure code (indirect testimony), which reintroduced theprohibition on judicial police officers testifying de relato?38. How is the instrument of the reading out of documents due to impossiblerepetition (article 512 of the criminal procedure code) used in relation tostatements gathered immediately after apprehension from illegal immigrants?39. What are the difficulties in interpreting the norms on reading statements givenby people domiciled abroad (article 512-bis of the criminal procedure code) inrelation to those taken immediately after apprehension from illegal immigrants?40. What other difficulties have arisen during trials?- How would you suggest these difficulties should be overcome?41. What is the average duration of a procedural activity?42. In the case of positive outcomes, what have been the main reasons, accordingto you?To sum up. Regarding procedural activity, which practice would you suggest shouldbe used at prosecutor’s offices or, in a de iure condendo perspective, what reformof the norms would you recommend for better control over the problem?3 Judicial cooperation between the Italian competent authorities and those of thecountries of origin of migrants43. Has cooperation with foreign authorities been necessary during trials? If so,what kind?44. What kind of international rogatory procedures have been used?272