10.07.2015 Views

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. <strong>The</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> has a role <strong>to</strong> play in returning a recovered worker <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> workplace. Wherea worker is not capable or able <strong>to</strong> perform work that pays <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong>ir pre-injurywages, <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> should “<strong>to</strong>p-up” <strong>the</strong>ir wages <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> pre-injury amount, not <strong>to</strong> exceed<strong>the</strong> YMIR.5. As well as a financial role, <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> has a facilitating role <strong>to</strong> play <strong>to</strong> assist <strong>the</strong>employer <strong>to</strong> fulfill <strong>the</strong>ir duty <strong>to</strong> accommodate. This could include funds forspecialized equipment or working with <strong>the</strong> employer and recovered worker <strong>to</strong> enablea return <strong>to</strong> work.6. <strong>The</strong>re are time limits that should be considered. <strong>The</strong>se include <strong>the</strong> time limit on <strong>the</strong>employer’s duty <strong>to</strong> accommodate. For example, if it takes an injured worker severalyears <strong>to</strong> recover, is it reasonable that <strong>the</strong> employer has a continuing duty <strong>to</strong>accommodate <strong>the</strong> worker? Is it reasonable that an employer should have <strong>to</strong>accommodate a worker who has been employed for only a few weeks? Is itreasonable for an employer <strong>to</strong> fulfill <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>to</strong> accommodate an injured worker and<strong>the</strong>n fire <strong>the</strong>m shortly after without just cause?<strong>The</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> feels <strong>the</strong>se limiting fac<strong>to</strong>rs on an employer’s duty <strong>to</strong> accommodate requirecareful and informed consideration.Recommendations: 3.12.1 Duty <strong>to</strong> Accommodate1. <strong>The</strong> legislation should be changed <strong>to</strong> incorporate <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> an employer’s duty<strong>to</strong> accommodate a recovered worker.2. <strong>The</strong> legislative changes should include limitations on <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>to</strong> accommodate asdescribed in Section 3.12.1, Duty <strong>to</strong> Accommodate.3.12.2 Liability <strong>of</strong> Corporate Direc<strong>to</strong>rs<strong>The</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> was asked <strong>to</strong> consider an apparent deficiency in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>s related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> personalliability <strong>of</strong> corporate direc<strong>to</strong>rs for monies owed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re are legislatedobligations for corporate direc<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> personally pay monies owing for worker-related<strong>WCB</strong> <strong>Legislative</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Page 77 <strong>of</strong> 128December, 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!