10.07.2015 Views

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Appeals Tribunal must give <strong>the</strong> appellant and o<strong>the</strong>r interested parties, such as <strong>the</strong>WAO, an opportunity <strong>to</strong> appear before <strong>the</strong> Tribunal and <strong>to</strong> present evidence.Stakeholders and <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> respondents <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stakeholder Questionnaire <strong>to</strong>ld usabout <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> an independent Appeals Tribunal. That is, independence from<strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>rs and <strong>WCB</strong> administration. This independence is crucial <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> reality and perception <strong>of</strong> fair and objective consideration <strong>of</strong> appeals from workers,dependants, and employers. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> agrees.Stakeholders suggested that measures <strong>of</strong> independence include: Support staff and pr<strong>of</strong>essional advisors who work for <strong>the</strong> Appeals Tribunal(and definitely not <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong>). Offices physically removed from those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong>. Final decision-making authority (in o<strong>the</strong>r words, no rehearing or stays <strong>of</strong>Appeals Tribunal decisions). No restrictions on <strong>the</strong> conduct <strong>of</strong> appeals (in o<strong>the</strong>r words, no requirement <strong>to</strong>apply <strong>the</strong> policies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>rs, or only apply policieswhere applicable).Some stakeholders linked <strong>the</strong> qualifications <strong>of</strong> Appeals Tribunal members <strong>to</strong>independence. <strong>The</strong>ir reasoning was that unless members have a good understanding <strong>of</strong>administrative law and legal principles which apply <strong>to</strong> an appeal process, such as naturaljustice, <strong>the</strong> Appeals Tribunal cannot make independent (and informed) decisions withoutdepending on <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> administration. <strong>The</strong>se are matters for <strong>the</strong> Minister <strong>to</strong> consider inhis appointment <strong>of</strong> members and for <strong>the</strong> Appeals Tribunal itself <strong>to</strong> consider when settingits rules and operational plans, such as training and development for members. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Panel</strong>found several recommendations about <strong>the</strong> qualifications and training <strong>of</strong> Appeals Tribunalmembers made in <strong>the</strong> Friedman <strong>Report</strong> <strong>to</strong> be helpful in this regard. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> noted that<strong>the</strong> legislation was changed <strong>to</strong> make members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>WCB</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>rs ineligiblefor appointment <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Appeals Tribunal. Subsection 7.7(4) appears <strong>to</strong> be left over from aprevious time and should be removed.<strong>WCB</strong> <strong>Legislative</strong> <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Panel</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Page 42 <strong>of</strong> 128December, 2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!