Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC HEARINGS3.7.2 Assessments for Extra-territorialWorkers:No duplication of assessments by WCBs. ‣ Inuvik Discussion, 27-28/03/01Key:OS – Oral SubmissionWS – Written SubmissionMake claims only in jurisdiction in whichassessment is paid.WCBs should rework interprovincialagreements for assessment; employershould not pay twice.Coverage for short term employees inCanada needs to be resolved.Risks for Canadian workers overseas areoften higher, such as dangeroustransportation.3.7.3 Rewarding Safe Employers:Safety rebates and incentives shouldapply.Penalties should apply for poor safetyperformance.‣ CAPP (Miller) (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01‣ Imperial Oil Ltd. (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01‣ CAPP (WS), 23/08/01‣ Yellowknife Discussion, 16/08/01‣ Norman Wells Discussion, 26-27/03/01‣ Inuvik Discussion, 27-28/03/01‣ Cambridge Bay Discussion, 29-30/03/01‣ CAPP (Miller) (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01‣ J. Posynick (OS/WS), Yellowknife,29/05/01‣ Canadian Red Cross (WS), 21/08/01‣ Imperial Oil Ltd. (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01‣ CAPP (WS), 23/08/01Link assessments to accident rates. ‣ Yellowknife Discussion, 16/08/01‣ Braden-Burry Expediting Services Ltd.(OS/WS), Yellowknife, 17/08/013.7.4 Appeal of Assessments:Appeal of classification, reclassificationshould be allowed.‣ Braden-Burry Expediting Services Ltd.(OS/WS), Yellowknife, 17/08/013.8 Industrial Classification3.8.1 Process for Establishing IndustrialClassification:Employers to set classes. ‣ K. Diebold (OS), Inuvik, 27-28/03/01Criteria should be transparent.‣ Imperial Oil (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01Appendix DPage D16 of D25WCB Legislative Review Panel Report December, 2001
Key:SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC HEARINGS‣ CAPP (WS), 23/08/01‣ Braden-Burry Expediting Services, Ltd.(OS/WS), Yellowknife, 17/08/01OS – Oral SubmissionWS – Written Submission3.8.2 Classifying an Employer in Morethan One Class or Subclass:Mixed rates should apply, especially foradministration staff.Separate high risk occupations within anindustry, so the correct employers sharethe costs, not all employers within thatindustry.Classification within an industry shouldbe appropriate.‣ Inuvik Discussion,27-28/03/01‣ CAPP (Miller) (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01‣ J. Posynick (OS/WS), Yellowknife,29/05/01‣ Imperial Oil Ltd. (OS/WS), Yellowknife,16/08/01‣ CAPP (WS), 23/08/013.9 Accident Fund3.9.1 Fully Funded Accident Fund:Keep fully funded status. ‣ Norman Wells Discussion, 26-27/03/013.9.2 Accident Fund Surplus:WCB should not have surplus. ‣ S. Lee (OS/WS), Yellowknife, 28/05/01Use Surplus to pay rebates. ‣ Norman Wells Discussion, 26-27/03/013.9.3 Authority to Make Investments:Prohibit government from directinginvestments.3.10 Access to Information3.10.1 Access to WCB Documents:Monthly disclosures by WCB to Workers’Advisor Office.‣ Norman Wells Discussion, 26-27/03/01‣ Workers’ Advisor Office (OS/WS),Yellowknife, 28/05/01Medical records should be accessible. ‣ Iqaluit Discussion, 15/08/01‣ Yellowknife Discussion, 28/05/01 and16/08/01WCB should make complete disclosure toappellant of documents used in appealsprocess.Public should have access to previousappeals decisions.‣ Braden-Burry Expediting Services Ltd.(OS/WS), Yellowknife, 17/08/01‣ K. Tompkins (OS/WS), Yellowknife,28/05/01Appendix DPage D17 of D25WCB Legislative Review Panel Report December, 2001
Page 1 and 2:
Accountable…to stakeholdersCompen
Page 3 and 4:
Table Of Contents3.4.3 Employers’
Page 5 and 6:
Table Of Contents5.0 A FINAL WORD 1
Page 7 and 8:
The Legislative Review Directorate
Page 9 and 10:
3.0 Workers’Compensation Acts3.1
Page 11 and 12:
2.0 General ThemesDuring the course
Page 13 and 14:
The Panel has generally adopted the
Page 15 and 16:
The Panel did receive positive comm
Page 17 and 18:
wanted was to return to work and st
Page 19 and 20:
2. Are there workers in specific in
Page 21 and 22:
Panel feels legislation should be p
Page 23 and 24:
3.2 WCB Authority and Accountabilit
Page 25 and 26:
WCB Board of Directors may chose to
Page 27 and 28:
3.2.6 Regular Reviews of the Worker
Page 29 and 30:
Recommendations: 3.2.8 Liability Pr
Page 31 and 32:
Legislation in 2 other jurisdiction
Page 33 and 34:
The legislation in other jurisdicti
Page 35 and 36:
ones held accountable for a decisio
Page 37 and 38:
members may be reappointed to the W
Page 39 and 40:
Some suggested that having a compen
Page 41 and 42:
Recommendations: 3.4.2 Workers’ A
Page 43 and 44:
The WCB Board of Directors made the
Page 45 and 46:
esolutions committees, under the au
Page 47 and 48:
The Appeals Tribunal must give the
Page 49 and 50:
The Panel considered the establishm
Page 51 and 52:
Recommendations: 3.5.5 Time Limits
Page 53 and 54:
are not familiar with some of the u
Page 55 and 56:
The Panel was interested in the Ont
Page 57 and 58:
Workers’ compensation payments ar
Page 59 and 60:
3.6.3 Year’s Maximum Insurable Re
Page 61 and 62:
The Acts are very specific in some
Page 63 and 64:
3.6.5 Indexing Compensation by Comm
Page 65 and 66:
2. The legislation should be change
Page 67 and 68:
The Panel considered whether the in
Page 69 and 70:
The Panel heard from some stakehold
Page 71 and 72:
The Acts require any employer, whet
Page 73 and 74:
Respondents to the Stakeholder Ques
Page 75 and 76:
The Panel agrees. We see prior cons
Page 77 and 78:
3.9.3 Authority to Make Investments
Page 79 and 80:
Respondents to the Stakeholder Ques
Page 81 and 82:
The duty to accommodate is not an o
Page 83 and 84:
payments such as income tax or payr
Page 85 and 86:
3.13 Environmental ChangeThe Acts h
Page 87 and 88:
construction permits is a matter of
Page 89 and 90:
date sections, reordering the “pa
Page 91 and 92:
The Panel has recommended changes t
Page 93 and 94:
the WCB when it is contemplating ch
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
The Panel was asked to consider rec
Page 99 and 100:
No other jurisdictions regulate wor
Page 101 and 102:
4.2.5 Safety InspectionsSome stakeh
Page 103 and 104:
4.4 Employer Responsibilities4.4.1
Page 105 and 106:
The Panel feels that the instrument
Page 107 and 108:
Recommendation: 4.6.2 Consistency w
Page 109 and 110:
others have experience as employers
Page 111 and 112:
While the Panel heard positive comm
Page 113 and 114:
5. Operational versus Legislative I
Page 115 and 116:
3. The legislation should be amende
Page 117 and 118:
3. It is suggested that the first r
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Recommendations: 3.5.5 Time Limits
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Recommendation: 3.7.3 Rewarding Saf
Page 127 and 128:
Recommendation: 3.12.4 Employer Rec
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Regulations (see also Recommendatio
Page 133 and 134:
5.0 A Final WordThe Panel has recom
Page 135 and 136:
Glossary and DefinitionsAccident Fu
Page 137 and 138:
Glossary and DefinitionsNet annualr
Page 139 and 140:
WCB Legislative Review Panel Terms
Page 141 and 142: WCB LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PANELTERMS O
Page 143 and 144: STAKEHOLDER QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUMMA
Page 177 and 178: SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC HEARI
Page 183 and 184: Key:SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC H
Page 191: SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC HEARI
Page 199 and 200: smoke.Key:SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PU
Page 203 and 204: SUMMARY OF FORMAL PRESENTATIONS AND
Page 205: SUMMARY OF FORMAL PRESENTATIONS AND
show all

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?