Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

More documents

Recommendations

Info

STAKEHOLDER QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUMMARY OF RESPONSES27. It has been suggested that any Employment Insurance income should be added when figuring out net yearly wages for seasonalworkers. Net yearly wages are used when figuring out compensation for an injured worker.a) Do you think this is a good idea? Yes = 55No = 36b) Who should pay the extra WCB assessments to cover orinsure the amount of Employment Insurance income?Employers = 20WCB = 32Workers = 26 Government / EI Federal government Shared This is a loaded and unfair question meant to get targeted at employees28. There is concern about the amount of compensation that is paid when a worker dies from a workplace accident or illness. The Actsdescribe the payment of a lump sum equal to 4% of YMIR or about $2,500 to the husband or wife; money for funeral services up to 4% ofYMIR; and pensions for the husband or wife (about $20,000 a year) and to children (about $4,700 a year). The 4% has not changed since1977. It has been suggested these amounts are too low. It has also been suggested that the Acts do not take into account different familysituations, for example, there are no lump sum benefits for a worker’s parents if the worker was not married.a) Should the amount of compensation paid on the death ofa worker be described in the Acts?b) If no to (a), who should approve the amount ofcompensation paid when a worker dies from a workplaceaccident or illness?c) Do you think the amount of compensation is too low? Yes = 86No = 8d) Do you think that the parents of an unmarried workershould receive compensation if the worker dies from aworkplace accident or illness?Yes = 80No = 13 Should be PolicyMinister = 11WCB Board of Directors = 22 Independent adjudicator Should be Policy On Board separate to anyoneYes = 66No = 27 Unless they are dependants 6 x Unless the worker was living with parents and contributing to familyincome. Only enough to help with funeral and burial costsAppendix C Page C18 of C33WCB Legislative Review Panel Report December, 2001
STAKEHOLDER QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUMMARY OF RESPONSES29. The WCB may “commute” a worker’s ongoing pension. This means the worker gets one lump sum payment and the pension stops. TheWCB does this only if the worker asks. The Acts do not describe any conditions for paying a lump sum payment to a worker.a) Should the WCB always have to commute a worker’spension if the worker asks for it?b) If no to (a), should the worker have to have a reason forasking for a lump sum payment?c) If yes to (b), what are good reasons to commute apension?d) If no to (a), should a worker have to show the WCB thatthey know how to use the money?e) Do you think the Acts should describe when and howworkers could ask for lump sum payments instead of anongoing pension?Yes = 35No = 59Yes = 53No = 17Purchase a house or pay down a mortgage = 38Buy a business = 30 Hardship To be discussed with worker reps Gainful employment Bury a family member/funeral costs 3 x Financial problems stemming from being on compensation Should only rarely be allowed There is no good reason pensions should not be commuted. Medical 3 x Worker should deem his/her own needs Any worthwhile endeavor 2 x Education Home renovations for access, etc. 2 x any reason that will improve overall quality of life Any reasonYes = 40No = 28Yes = 70No = 20Appendix C Page C19 of C33WCB Legislative Review Panel Report December, 2001
Page 1 and 2:
Accountable…to stakeholdersCompen
Page 3 and 4:
Table Of Contents3.4.3 Employers’
Page 5 and 6:
Table Of Contents5.0 A FINAL WORD 1
Page 7 and 8:
The Legislative Review Directorate
Page 9 and 10:
3.0 Workers’Compensation Acts3.1
Page 11 and 12:
2.0 General ThemesDuring the course
Page 13 and 14:
The Panel has generally adopted the
Page 15 and 16:
The Panel did receive positive comm
Page 17 and 18:
wanted was to return to work and st
Page 19 and 20:
2. Are there workers in specific in
Page 21 and 22:
Panel feels legislation should be p
Page 23 and 24:
3.2 WCB Authority and Accountabilit
Page 25 and 26:
WCB Board of Directors may chose to
Page 27 and 28:
3.2.6 Regular Reviews of the Worker
Page 29 and 30:
Recommendations: 3.2.8 Liability Pr
Page 31 and 32:
Legislation in 2 other jurisdiction
Page 33 and 34:
The legislation in other jurisdicti
Page 35 and 36:
ones held accountable for a decisio
Page 37 and 38:
members may be reappointed to the W
Page 39 and 40:
Some suggested that having a compen
Page 41 and 42:
Recommendations: 3.4.2 Workers’ A
Page 43 and 44:
The WCB Board of Directors made the
Page 45 and 46:
esolutions committees, under the au
Page 47 and 48:
The Appeals Tribunal must give the
Page 49 and 50:
The Panel considered the establishm
Page 51 and 52:
Recommendations: 3.5.5 Time Limits
Page 53 and 54:
are not familiar with some of the u
Page 55 and 56:
The Panel was interested in the Ont
Page 57 and 58:
Workers’ compensation payments ar
Page 59 and 60:
3.6.3 Year’s Maximum Insurable Re
Page 61 and 62:
The Acts are very specific in some
Page 63 and 64:
3.6.5 Indexing Compensation by Comm
Page 65 and 66:
2. The legislation should be change
Page 67 and 68:
The Panel considered whether the in
Page 69 and 70:
The Panel heard from some stakehold
Page 71 and 72:
The Acts require any employer, whet
Page 73 and 74:
Respondents to the Stakeholder Ques
Page 75 and 76:
The Panel agrees. We see prior cons
Page 77 and 78:
3.9.3 Authority to Make Investments
Page 79 and 80:
Respondents to the Stakeholder Ques
Page 81 and 82:
The duty to accommodate is not an o
Page 83 and 84:
payments such as income tax or payr
Page 85 and 86:
3.13 Environmental ChangeThe Acts h
Page 87 and 88:
construction permits is a matter of
Page 89 and 90:
date sections, reordering the “pa
Page 91 and 92:
The Panel has recommended changes t
Page 93 and 94:
the WCB when it is contemplating ch
Page 95 and 96:
4. The legislation should be change
Page 97 and 98:
The Panel was asked to consider rec
Page 99 and 100:
No other jurisdictions regulate wor
Page 101 and 102:
4.2.5 Safety InspectionsSome stakeh
Page 103 and 104:
4.4 Employer Responsibilities4.4.1
Page 105 and 106:
The Panel feels that the instrument
Page 107 and 108:
Recommendation: 4.6.2 Consistency w
Page 109 and 110: others have experience as employers
Page 111 and 112: While the Panel heard positive comm
Page 113 and 114: 5. Operational versus Legislative I
Page 115 and 116: 3. The legislation should be amende
Page 117 and 118: 3. It is suggested that the first r
Page 119 and 120: 2. The legislation should be change
Page 121 and 122: Recommendations: 3.5.5 Time Limits
Page 125 and 126: Recommendation: 3.7.3 Rewarding Saf
Page 127 and 128: Recommendation: 3.12.4 Employer Rec
Page 131 and 132: Regulations (see also Recommendatio
Page 133 and 134: 5.0 A Final WordThe Panel has recom
Page 135 and 136: Glossary and DefinitionsAccident Fu
Page 137 and 138: Glossary and DefinitionsNet annualr
Page 139 and 140: WCB Legislative Review Panel Terms
Page 141 and 142: WCB LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PANELTERMS O
Page 143 and 144: STAKEHOLDER QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUMMA
Page 159: STAKEHOLDER QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUMMA
Page 177 and 178: SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC HEARI
Page 183 and 184: Key:SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC H
Page 193 and 194: Key:SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PUBLIC H
Page 199 and 200: smoke.Key:SUMMARY OF ISSUES FROM PU
Page 203 and 204: SUMMARY OF FORMAL PRESENTATIONS AND
Page 205: SUMMARY OF FORMAL PRESENTATIONS AND
show all

Act Now - The Report of the WCB Legislative Review Panel to the

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?