19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

when we realise that it is merely part of a symmetrical harmonic/melodic structure: a<br />

tune, in short. Nevertheless, it has to be conceded that this material lacks the strong<br />

character necessary for a sonata movement; while the counterpoint is insufficiently<br />

compelling for a successful fugue. The piece is rather like a compilation of less<br />

distinctive (sequential and developmental) passages that might occur in the transitional<br />

portions of either genre. Such virtues as this fugue has (and it does have some) are<br />

rather diluted over its 202-bar length. Listening to it or playing it through is an<br />

experience typical of many later eighteenth-century fugues: interest flickers at a low<br />

level from moment to moment, without ever quite disappearing. 73<br />

In addition to the VIII Fugen, three other manualiter fugues have been<br />

attributed to W. F. Bach in Traugott Fedtke’s edition of the Orgelwerke. The first, in<br />

B flat, turns out to be a transcription of the overture to Handel’s oratorio Esther. Even<br />

if this were not known to be the case, it would stand apart from the other fugues by<br />

virtue of its independent bass and extended figural episodes. Another long fugue in F<br />

(F.33) is generally described as a youthful exercise. It is thoroughly in earnest, but has<br />

little else to recommend it. In a sense it is almost too ‘earnest’: the three voices are<br />

almost continuously in action, the pervading chromatic counter-subject defeats itself<br />

through its omnipresence, and there are neither compelling ideas nor a compelling<br />

formal design.<br />

On the other hand, the C minor fugue (F.32) which follows seems to me worthy<br />

of much more than Geiringer’s cool dismissal: ‘not quite on the same level as these<br />

clever and inspired compositions’ (the VIII Fugen) and ‘formalistic in its polyphonic<br />

treatment’, 74 being perhaps the most successful clavier fugue he ever wrote. It is long<br />

—111 bars, moving mostly in semiquavers. But unlike the juvenile fugue in F, or the<br />

73 It is worth noting, however, that this is the one fugue of W. F. Bach’s that Mozart chose to transcribe<br />

for string trio (K.404a/6). He may have chosen it as the one furthest away from his normal style—<br />

the nature of the most of the other fugues in K.404a would tend to support this.<br />

74 Geiringer, Bach family, p.320.<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!