19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of thinking over long spans.’ 44<br />

BWV 565 by contrast is an example of almost the opposite—in spite of its<br />

innumerable contrapuntal deficiencies, it is propelled by an unstoppable sense of<br />

formal purpose. 45 Bars 73-91, although quite un-Bachian in their simplicity of means,<br />

show a masterly control of pacing. Beginning with an absolute minimum of musical<br />

content, tension increases as the bass-line ascends. Deflected by the sudden descent in<br />

b.83, intensity begins to build in earnest in b.85 with the introduction of<br />

demisemiquavers and the addition of other voices in a kind of scalar descent.<br />

Although contrapuntally redundant (the G is already present in the subject) the trilled<br />

dominant pedal contributes nicely to this build-up, as does the immediate repetition of<br />

this passage with the subject in another voice and the trill transferred to the upper<br />

voice. A descending sequential passage brings us down from this peak of excitement.<br />

Consider, further, the unaccompanied pedal entry in b.109 we mentioned<br />

above. A flat contradiction of the basic ethos of fugal construction, it is, in its context,<br />

strikingly effective. The upper voices do not inexplicably evaporate leaving us to<br />

wonder what has happened to the texture, for this passage is well prepared by the<br />

repeated imperfect cadences of bb.105-109. The pedal solo itself combines the<br />

climactic effect of both an ordinary pedal entry and of the traditional florid pedal solo<br />

that occurs in so many north German Praeludia (cf BuxWV 142 and 146, BWV 543,<br />

or Vincent Lübeck’s Praeludium in E). It is then itself capped as the rest of the voices<br />

enter and continue the fugue.<br />

In short, while remaining a distinctly suspect fugue, BWV 565 manages to be a<br />

thoroughly exciting piece of music. Nevertheless—however exciting it may—be the<br />

looseness of its fugal construction makes it nearly impossible to reconcile with what<br />

44 Humphreys, ‘BWV 534’, p.177.<br />

45 In this respect it prefigures an aspect of Mendelssohn’s fugal style, which was always ready to<br />

sacrifice the integrity of his voices for a clear sense of formal and textural direction (although his<br />

counterpoint was never quite as minimalist as that of BWV 565.)<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!