19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

einforces them. Its texture is impossibly lax and casual for an authentic work of J. S.<br />

Bach. One might argue that Bach’s early fugues are much less strict in this respect<br />

than later examples (a standard and plausible defence for many doubtful works), and<br />

this is true up to a point; but such details as the subdominant answer (the tonal scheme<br />

of the whole movement is skewed in that direction), the extended sequential codettas<br />

during the exposition, the simple minded tonic-dominant passagework in bb.73-82, 40<br />

and the unaccompanied pedal entry in b.109 41 are highly uncharacteristic of J. S.<br />

Bach’s music of any period. Comparison with the fugue in D major BWV 532, in<br />

many ways quite a similar work, bears this out. A greater textural, harmonic and tonal<br />

sophistication is present throughout; however primitive the accompanying<br />

counterpoint becomes, it is never reduced to simply following the subject around in<br />

thirds and sixths (cf BWV 565 bb.32-34, and just about every other entry) 42 or<br />

hovering redundantly on the same note (bb.52-53; doubly redundant because this note<br />

is also present in the subject). The subject of BWV 565 is itself uncharacteristic of<br />

Bach, in that it lacks the sense of completion and character most of his subjects<br />

possess—it sounds like the sort of figuration that might occur during the course of a<br />

movement, but lacks a clear thematic profile. There are subjects that seesaw in this<br />

violinistic manner (BVW 543 in A minor, BWV 548 in E minor), but never simply<br />

between the dominant and a stepwise line of quavers. As this would suggest, the<br />

entries are uncharacteristically static harmonically. Significantly, the episodes sound<br />

more convincingly like J. S. Bach than any of the entries, especially bb.49-51, 54-57,<br />

95-102 and 111-114, where harmonic interest is much higher. The closing section<br />

(b.127 onwards) also sounds a lot more like early Bach, showing much greater<br />

harmonic inventiveness than the opening (the progression between bb.132 and 133 is<br />

especially effective and original). Only the concluding chords, so effective on a big<br />

40 Ibid., 333.<br />

41 Ibid., 333.<br />

42 Ibid., 334.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!