19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bach’s style before the composer’s assimilation of Vivaldi’s idiom around 1712, and<br />

how little we know about the experiments in Bach’s initial drafts’ and adjuring us: ‘It<br />

is perplexing, of course, but let’s face it: Bach had some difficulty writing fugues<br />

containing more than four voices.’ 29 Likewise, in his revised edition of The organ<br />

music of J. S. Bach, Peter Williams also resists Humphreys’ conclusions, largely<br />

preserving his reading of 1980; although he is now more circumspect about the<br />

question of authorship. He ascribes BWV 534’s contrapuntal infelicities to errors of<br />

transmission, and argues that ‘so distinctive a harmonic and melodic character make it<br />

hard to believe that Bach had no hand in the piece’, finding ‘a warmth to the harmony<br />

and melody hard to attribute to any pupil.’ 30 Clearly, as Harvey Grace found: ‘this<br />

fugue gets hold of one in a curious way.’ 31<br />

Although long assumed to be a part of Bach’s output, BWV 534 has not been<br />

performed as frequently as other, similar works and is therefore not especially well-<br />

known to the general musical public (could we interpret this as an example of ‘the<br />

invisible hand of the canon’ at work?). This is certainly not true of the next work we<br />

shall look at: ‘the’ Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565.<br />

There is little doubt that this is ‘the most famous piece of organ music ever<br />

written’. 32 Its fame and long-established position in the Bach canon (in volume IV of<br />

the Peters edition, among the ‘classical’ preludes and fugues) have tended to obscure<br />

just how unlike its companions it really is. Its attribution remained unchallenged,<br />

however, until Peter Williams opened the discussion in 1981. The doubts he<br />

expressed can be grouped under four headings: extra-musical problems; then questions<br />

that arise from the beginning, the middle, and the end of the piece. 33 The source itself<br />

29 Review of Bach, Handel, Scarlatti: Tercentary Essays, Musical Quarterly 72/2 (1986), 278.<br />

30 nd The organ music of J. S. Bach, 2 ed. (New York: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 2003) pp.50, 51.<br />

31 See p.46 above. It is worth comparing Williams’ indifference to relatively minor works such as<br />

BWV 580 (an alla breve fugue in D) or 897 (Prelude and Fugue in A minor; Dretzel), which have<br />

been excised from the canon without regret.<br />

32 Peter Williams, ‘BWV 565: a toccata in D minor for organ by J. S. Bach?’ Early Music, 9/3 (July<br />

1981), 330.<br />

33 Observations not footnoted are my own.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!