19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

periodicity and its fluctuating tonality, should find employment as a mode of<br />

development is hardly surprising. An extreme case is the finale of Beethoven’s op.101<br />

Sonata in A, where a fugue upon a subject derived from the opening theme serves as<br />

the entire development (p.381). More typical are Clementi’s opp.40 and 50 sonatas<br />

(pp.362-6), where imitative counterpoint is used in conjunction with a whole range of<br />

developmental techniques to destabilise and reinterpret the movement’s thematic<br />

material. The same can be true within rondo forms as well. In the finales to Haydn’s<br />

Symphonies no.95 and 103 (pp.211-5), and even more in Wesley’s rondo ‘The<br />

Christmas Carol’ (pp.362-6), fugal imitation supplies flexible connective tissue<br />

between the recurrences of the rondo theme. On the other hand nothing can be taken<br />

for granted with Haydn, and the finale to his symphony no.101 reverses this procedure,<br />

substituting a sizeable fugal development for the final return of the rondo theme<br />

(pp.212-3).<br />

This sort of unpredictability should warn us that generalisations will take us<br />

only so far. There was no ‘normal’ way of integrating fugue and sonata; in fact, the<br />

opposite is true. Each attempt to combine two such disparate ways of writing created<br />

its own problems and its own solutions, forcing composers to go beyond the<br />

conventional limitations of genre. It is no accident that the composers whose approach<br />

to form and texture was the most flexible and imaginative—Samuel Wesley, Haydn,<br />

Mozart, Clementi, and Beethoven—were also those who had the strongest affinity with<br />

the disciplines of strict counterpoint.<br />

Our story ends with Beethoven. For all his immense influence upon the early<br />

Romantics, the distinctions between them are at least as important as any affinities. If<br />

he was the last to possess an instinct for the possibilities of the Classical style as a<br />

natural mode of utterance, it was this instinct that limited his ability to absorb the<br />

influence of the past—a presence that he and his contemporaries were increasingly<br />

404

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!