19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Baroque, but did so subtly, without endangering fugal continuity. His fugue in F<br />

(Gradus no.40; p.370) introduced something of the brilliant figuration his sonatas were<br />

famous for, with no compromise of thematic integrity. Wesley went further in his<br />

‘Salomon’ sonata (pp.186-93), introducing not just the expanded tonal resources of the<br />

early nineteenth century but its sense of drama and rhetorical contrast, all within the<br />

context of a fugue, never losing sight of his subject. But it was of course Beethoven<br />

who had the most grandiose designs upon fugue, assembling a similar range of<br />

textures and keys on an even larger scale in the ‘Hammerklavier’ fugue (pp.384-6): an<br />

enormous design as clearly articulated as any sonata, but completely fugal in design;<br />

pianistically dazzling, but in three strict voices for most of its length. Seven years later<br />

he would surpass even this with the Grosse Fuge (pp.386-8), which could not even be<br />

contained within the boundaries of a single metre. Made up of several interrelated<br />

sections, all dependent upon the same subject, it resembles nothing so much as a<br />

variation canzona of the seventeenth century executed on an infinitely greater scale.<br />

With this movement the history of fugue could be said to have come full circle.<br />

All of these can be fairly clearly identified as fugues rather than sonata<br />

movements, even if they show other influences; equally interesting are the hybrid<br />

structures which are difficult to classify as either. In Samuel Wesley’s Presto (pp.144-<br />

9), for example, two quite separate modes of organisation—sonata movement, with<br />

exposition (including a ‘second theme’ and strongly established secondary key),<br />

development, and recapitulation; and fugue, with successive permutational entries—<br />

coexist throughout. Haydn’s Symphony no.3 (pp.202-6) resists categorisation in a<br />

slightly different way, teasing us by apparently forsaking then reaffirming its<br />

contrapuntal intentions, suggesting but not quite completing a sonata design.<br />

A more common, much simpler sort of hybridisation is represented by what<br />

402

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!