19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Arioso into the rest of the movement he has to find his way back to the tonic A flat<br />

without disrupting the fugal continuity—that is, without appearing to stretch its tonal<br />

conventions unduly. He achieves this through a discreet sleight of hand in bb.145-52.<br />

The crucial shift, prepared by a stray E flat in b.145, is brought about by reinterpreting<br />

G major as the dominant of C minor in b.152. From this key it is an easy step to E flat<br />

(b.168 ‘Meno allegro’), and A flat is confirmed with the bass entry—the subject in its<br />

original form—at b.174. What the first exposition in A flat failed to do, the second<br />

has now achieved.<br />

In itself this is nothing more than a clever expedient, an ingenious solution to<br />

an interesting musical problem; its emotional significance derives entirely from the<br />

pathos of the Arioso and the affect, consoling then celebratory, of the fugue. But this<br />

procedure is the engine which raises this emotional significance to a higher power than<br />

would have been possible with a more conventional tonal scheme. There is something<br />

profoundly redemptive about the way the second fugue works its way back from G,<br />

taking the estranged key of the Arioso into itself and reconciling it with the tonic.<br />

Of another order of magnitude again are the two enormous fugal finales in B<br />

flat: that of the ‘Hammerklavier’ Sonata op.106, and the Grosse Fuge, op.133.<br />

Separated by about a decade, they have a lot in common—their immense length, their<br />

gritty, involuted counterpoint, their vast tonal and expressive range, and their complete<br />

disregard of the listener’s comfort or convenience. There are also significant<br />

differences between them, however.<br />

Like that in op.110, the ‘Hammerklavier’ fugue is an exercise in the systematic<br />

integration of distant keys into Beethoven’s fugal style; unlike op.110, this is not<br />

provoked by the presence of a ‘foreign body’ in the movement, but emerges from<br />

within the fugal texture itself. The problem here is how to make the full range of late<br />

Classical/Romantic tonal possibilities available without falling into the tonal disorder<br />

384

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!