19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

had a dual significance for Haydn. On the one hand, it was an important means for the<br />

development of his style and technique, allowing him to explore the consequences of<br />

the extreme democratisation of part-writing it implied. On the other hand, it may also<br />

have been a stop-gap, allowing him to fulfil his compositional commitments when<br />

inspiration or energy flagged.<br />

STRING QUARTETS<br />

As we have observed, it was Haydn’s string quartets that broadcast his name<br />

the furthest. Although Prince Nicholas seems to have received a command<br />

performance of each set as it was composed, string quartet-writing was largely<br />

tangential to Haydn’s official duties as Kapellmeister. A gap of about a decade<br />

separates the early sets (c.1757-c.1762) from opp.9, 17, and 20 (c.1770-72), and there<br />

was a similar gap between this group and op.33 (1781). Given the stylistic advance<br />

each new group showed, it is tempting to infer some conscious mustering of resources,<br />

the same sense of screwing up courage to tackle this demanding genre which is<br />

demonstrably true of Mozart and Beethoven. The explanation is probably much<br />

simpler—a musician as busy as Haydn had little enough time to spare for music which<br />

was quite outside his job-description. Nevertheless, by 1768 or 69 he had probably<br />

consolidated his relationship with the prince sufficiently to enable him to cultivate his<br />

reputation outside Esterháza.<br />

The Haydn of op.9 was now a very different, and much more earnest, composer<br />

from the Haydn of opp.1 and 2. 30 As Landon observes, perhaps deliberately echoing<br />

Haydn’s much debated letter of recommendation for his op.33 quartets: ‘op.9 was<br />

30 He was of course literally a different composer from that of op.3—Roman Hofstetter, whose works<br />

found their way into the Haydn oeuvre more or less by accident. It is curious that, superficially at<br />

least, Hofstetter’s quartets show precisely the level of stylistic development we would expect to find<br />

if they had been in fact by Haydn, neatly straddling the gulf between op.2 and op.9.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!