19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The last fugue for baryton trio, from no.114, is not especially remarkable<br />

except in the manner of its closing. As we have noted, the Classical norm for the<br />

instrumental chamber performance of fugues was a uniform forte throughout<br />

(contrasting with the dynamic flexibility of the galant style). Here, however, Haydn<br />

writes out a concluding diminuendo. After pausing on a strong, widely-spaced<br />

dominant seventh chord, the effect of the sudden piano combined with the cessation of<br />

polyphonic activity is, in its own small way, surprisingly dramatic. The reverse<br />

procedure—a forte close after playing sempre sotto voce occurs in all the op.20 fugues,<br />

which had probably been written by this stage.<br />

Haydn was far too much of a courtier, both musically and personally, to divulge<br />

any hint of what he might have felt about the time he spent writing Gebrauchsmusik<br />

for his prince when he could have been extending his style in new and challenging<br />

ways, making a name for himself in the wider world. Given this discretion, it is<br />

difficult to weigh up the extent to which these trios were shaped by Prince Nicholas’<br />

personal taste, by Haydn’s attitude to their composition, and by the character of the<br />

instrument itself. In particular (for our purposes) we need to ask why, relatively<br />

speaking, fugal writing should have been so predominant in these works.<br />

Taking the last point first, the baryton trio was a timbrally homogeneous<br />

ensemble for private amusement rather than public display. It is hardly surprising<br />

therefore that the equal division of interest among the parts which fugue offered should<br />

have been an obvious textural solution—especially when we remember that at this<br />

time he was reasoning very much along these lines in his op.20 quartets. 27 While on<br />

the subject of instrumentation it is worth pointing out the way in which the baryton’s<br />

sympathetic strings are sometimes given important thematic material in the fugues<br />

(another reason for slow, first species subjects). Thus an utterly conventional passage<br />

such as Ex.3.8b is given a whole new life and interest by this unexpected timbral<br />

27 This trio and op.20 were both written in 1772 (op.20 was published in 1774).<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!