19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

around b.54, homophonic quaver figuration takes over entirely. Twenty five bars<br />

later, the fugato texture resumes with a close stretto—not difficult to manage with a<br />

scalar subject like this one—which leads to a vigorous, emphatic cadence on V/vi, and<br />

thence to the first return of the theme.<br />

The second episode begins with a brief stretto passage, substantially the same<br />

as bb.87-92, but any pretence at serious contrapuntal working disappears after b.146.<br />

This is followed by some fine minore blustering (b.152), after which we hear the ghost<br />

of a recapitulation (b.186), 19 and the movement ends in typical fashion with the<br />

orchestra banging away on I and V. Clearly Haydn has been taking advantage of<br />

fugue’s capacity to generate a continuously evolving texture, suitable for episodes<br />

between recurrences of the very four-square rondo theme.<br />

More unexpected is the use Haydn makes of a fugal texture in the finale to his<br />

Symphony no.101. For most of its length, this movement is a typical sonata/rondo<br />

finale in his late manner. The clearly demarcated rondo theme is followed by a<br />

powerful, sonata-like shift to the dominant, complete with a ‘second subject’ (derived<br />

from, but not the same as the first) and a big cadence in the new key, at which point<br />

the rondo theme returns. There is now a substantial minore episode, which prepares us<br />

for the final return of the rondo theme.<br />

Instead, however, we have a substantial fugato based on the rondo theme—<br />

probably the most comprehensive since that of Symphony no.70. Accompanied by a<br />

new countersubject, there are no fewer than five complete entries and many partial<br />

ones, mostly on I and V, but also iii and IV . The elegantly transparent counterpoint is<br />

mostly given to the strings, although an attractive detail of the orchestration is the<br />

series of false entries (first three notes of the subject) given to pairs of wind<br />

instruments in bb.218-225. Superficially it recalls the elementary woodwind writing<br />

19 A ‘ghost’ because only the first four bars of the theme recur, harmonised in a tonally ambiguous<br />

manner.<br />

212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!