19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

similar passages of octave counterpoint in several of Clementi’s sonatas (finales to<br />

opp.33/1, 40/2, and 40/3)—thus might the demands both of virtuosity and of<br />

counterpoint be said to have been met equally. A pause on the dominant-seventh<br />

ushers in what appears to be another stretto, but becomes simply a highly pianistic<br />

approach to the final cadence, which is reinforced both by a plagal tonic pedal (bb.187-<br />

190) and another perfect cadence (bb.190-192). The sonata concludes with an<br />

Allegretto finale, prophetic of Schubert at his most placid and bucolic.<br />

At the cost of perhaps slightly excessive length and monotony of material, the<br />

D major Presto discussed on pp.144-9 integrated the norms of both fugal procedure<br />

and sonata form with impressive ease. Samuel Wesley may not have even been aware<br />

that there was anything in particular to reconcile. Here, in the fugue of the Salomon<br />

sonata, he chose to use a much broader stylistic palette. J. S. Bach (bb.1-49) jostles<br />

shoulders with Clementi (bb.69-96, 135-175) and Mendelssohn (bb.112-115, 128-<br />

134), each of these styles being present in its most distinctive and unassimilable form.<br />

There are consequently a number of perceptible breaks in continuity during this<br />

movement, notably at bb.50, 96, 112, 128, and 166—places where Wesley slips from<br />

one style into another. In evaluating the fugue’s relative success or failure, phrases<br />

like ‘stylistic contradiction’ and ‘insufficiently integrated materials’ come all too<br />

readily to hand. These sorts of prefabricated judgements tend to hinder us from<br />

listening to particular cases in order to decide whether a given ‘contradiction’ is<br />

apparent or real. They arise from critical habits that unconsciously privilege unity over<br />

variety and integration over contrast, seeking only the first and taking the latter for<br />

granted. The movement’s ‘discontinuities’ are all strikingly effective rhetorical<br />

moments. Slightly better questions to explore might be 1) are these moments prepared<br />

and exploited for their maximum value?, and 2) do they contribute to or detract from<br />

the movement’s total effect?<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!