19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Although his music is seldom ostentatiously ‘pianistic’ in the manner of<br />

Dussek or Clementi, this is the sort of effect that shows Wesley knew how to use the<br />

capabilities of the piano when he wanted to. The ‘second subject’ is followed by<br />

further development of the second fugal subject; Ex.2.15 returns, followed again by<br />

further fugal development, and then comes the third part of this enormous sonata<br />

exposition. The first fugal subject appears first below then above a tremolando<br />

accompaniment, leading to a third appearance of Ex.2.15 and a surprisingly<br />

undemonstrative final cadence.<br />

After the repeat begins the ‘development section’ proper. It opens with a<br />

striking passage of octave counterpoint, then settles down to the same sort of<br />

sequential development as was prominent in the exposition. The first or second fugal<br />

subject is present often enough to ensure relevance to the rest of the piece, but much of<br />

the material is devised on the spot. Tonally it ranges as far afield as F sharp minor on<br />

the sharp side, F major on the flat (i.e. widely for a fugue, but not for a sonata<br />

development).<br />

The recapitulation (b.283) begins with a fugal exposition nearly identical to the<br />

opening, but its continuation is quite different. The first section oscillated between I<br />

and V (as fugal expositions usually do), ending on V/V (b.358); this section now<br />

touches a wider range of keys, including iii, vi, ii, and IV, before settling on V/I.<br />

Twice Ex.2.15 is interrupted, first by a development of its sixth bar (b.365-72), then by<br />

a development of its fifth bar (399-406), and as previously a development of the<br />

second fugal subject then carries us to the third part of the recapitulation. This is<br />

recognisably similar enough to its predecessor in the sonata’s exposition to fulfil its<br />

structural function, but again the details are worked out quite differently, with an<br />

effective detour flatward as far as C minor (bb.452-56). Clearly Samuel Wesley was<br />

not tempted to fill out his capacious design with large stretches of literal repetition.<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!