19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

instrumental fugues of Joseph Haydn,’ considers the role of indigenous Viennese<br />

contrapuntal traditions in the development of his mature style. The significance of this<br />

particular development extends well beyond its relevance to Haydn’s own oeuvre, for<br />

the growth of Haydn’s quartet style has tended to serve as a synecdoche for the<br />

development of the Classical style as a whole. If the ‘new and special manner’ of the<br />

op.33 quartets really does represent Haydn’s first attainment of a ‘true quartet style’,<br />

then they are the first such works ever—the first example perhaps of that perfect<br />

integration of the part and the whole, means and ends, that we still call Viennese<br />

Classicism. According to this reading, Haydn’s use of counterpoint is significant only<br />

insofar as it is integrated with and transfigured by sonata procedures. The fugal finales<br />

of the op.20 quartets and some of the earlier symphonies and baryton trios, therefore,<br />

can only be seen only as intermediate steps on the way to the point de perfection of<br />

op.33 (‘Gradus ad Parnassum’ indeed!) To regard Haydn’s fugal writing as being<br />

significant in its own right—indeed, as a culmination of the Viennese fugal tradition—<br />

is thus to raise questions about the entire shape of his achievement. In this chapter the<br />

strong sense of evolutionary teleology present in the accounts of Sandberger, Rosen, et<br />

al is contrasted with the revisionist approach of James Webster.<br />

Chapter four: ‘Mozart, finished and unfinished’ reflects upon the nature of<br />

musical incompleteness, exploring his curious inability or unwillingness to complete<br />

so many of the fugal fragments he began. Mozart’s engagement with fugue, more<br />

intense and more consistent than Haydn’s, was also more problematic. Several<br />

explanations for this, both musical and psychological, are advanced and compared.<br />

Until Baron van Swieten’s soirées of 1782, Mozart’s effortless facility had enabled<br />

him to imitate—and usually surpass—any music he came across. With the<br />

wohltemperirte Clavier fugues of J. S. Bach, for the first time he faced the challenge of<br />

a style he could emulate with only the greatest difficulty. For the first time he heard<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!