19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to follow in his father’s footsteps turned out more successfully. Developing the latent<br />

galant tendencies of J. S. Bach’s style one step further, Friedemann imbued his own<br />

fugues with a melodic attractiveness and individuality comparable to much of the<br />

WTC. On at least one occasion he demonstrated a large-scale mastery of contrapuntal<br />

resource equal to all but the most expansive of his father’s fugues (cf pp.78-80). The<br />

fugues of the next generation would have other qualities, but this sort of textural<br />

sophistication and thematic distinctiveness became increasingly rare.<br />

If, as seems likely, neither the Prelude and Fugue in F minor BWV 534 nor the<br />

Toccata and Fugue BWV 565 are by J. S. Bach but merely from his circle of students<br />

and admirers, we can trace in them two kinds of response to his example. BWV 534 is<br />

modelled so closely on Bach that its authenticity remained unquestioned for 140 years,<br />

and is not yet utterly disproved. The number of those, even among Bach’s students,<br />

who could have written thus is small indeed; and it is in fact the two composers we<br />

have just discussed, J. L. Krebs and W. F. Bach, who head the list. Certainly there are<br />

few others who showed both the capacity and the desire to get so close to the heart of<br />

their teacher’s style.<br />

The D minor Toccata and Fugue is a different kind of creature altogether. It<br />

seems likely that the discrepancies between it and Bach’s style are the result of<br />

technical deficiencies—incompetence, to put it bluntly 100 —but, as the analysis on<br />

pp.78-80 has argued, this does not prevent it from being a wonderfully effective piece<br />

of musical rhetoric: from becoming, indeed, ‘the most famous piece of organ music<br />

ever written.’ 101<br />

During the following chapters we shall see many examples of both approaches.<br />

All the composers we discuss at length: Wesley, Haydn, Mozart, Clementi, and<br />

100 It would be rash to read into these peculiarities a ‘conscious attempt’ to make a new sort of fugue, as<br />

Peter Williams does with regard to BWV 543 (p.48 above), an attempt such as Reicha clearly made<br />

with his 36 Fugues of 1803, or Schumann did in his ‘Fughetta’, op.32/4.<br />

101 P. Williams, ‘BWV 565’, 330.<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!