19.11.2012 Views

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

J. S. BACH Jonathan Berkahn - Victoria University - Victoria ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to expand and elaborate the surface of Mozart’s forms fifty years later. It is all very<br />

well done, with commendable thoroughness and skill, but sometimes one is tempted to<br />

ask just why it was done.<br />

The most extreme case of this rather decadent stylistic exaggeration can be<br />

seen in Krebs’s Prelude and Fugue in D minor. The Prelude alternates free-wheeling<br />

passagework in manuals and pedals with durezza chords and dense but mostly<br />

homophonic material for 144 bars (generally Bachian in style, rather than based upon a<br />

particular model)—and the fugue clocks in at no less than 238 bars! These are not<br />

short alla breve bars, either; there is plenty of quaver and semiquaver activity. This<br />

immense scale of operations raises two interesting question: 1) how is it physically<br />

possible to sustain a fugal argument over this sort of span, and 2) how does J. S. Bach<br />

not only sustain a fugal argument over this sort of span, but make it a compelling<br />

musical experience?<br />

The first question is easy enough, if a little tedious, to answer. After his<br />

exposition (four voices, ASBT), Krebs begins a series of alternating entries and<br />

episodes which takes him to b.53. The entries are mostly on i or v apart from a single<br />

exception (III) in b.28; the episodes are not derived in any obvious way from the<br />

subject or related to each other, but neither do they jar with their surroundings—there<br />

are six in total, mostly straightforwardly sequential. At b.53 a new subject appears,<br />

strangely reminiscent of that in ‘the’ Toccata and Fugue in D minor (BWV 565), but<br />

obviously destined to be a countersubject. First of all, however, it is granted its own<br />

exposition (BTAS). A cadence in A minor is followed rather unexpectedly by an entry<br />

in G minor (b.70), after which there follows the same alternation of tonic or dominant<br />

entries and sequential episodes that characterised the first section. It is not until b.102<br />

that we finally get to hear the two subjects in double harness; the combination is taken<br />

though an exposition of its own, then there follows another series of entries and<br />

100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!