10.07.2015 Views

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

variants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir Ig-like doma<strong>in</strong> III, <strong>the</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>R(III)b or <strong>FGF</strong>R(III)c is<strong>of</strong>orms (hereafter <strong>FGF</strong>Rbor <strong>FGF</strong>Rc, respectively; (Ornitz and Itoh 2001; Itoh and Ornitz 2004)). <strong>FGF</strong>s are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>many functions such as germ layer formation, limb development, cell proliferation and cellmigration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g embryo (Ornitz and Itoh 2001). In early <strong>mouse</strong> development, <strong>FGF</strong><strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong>is necessary for <strong>the</strong> migration <strong>of</strong> epiblast <strong>cells</strong> through <strong>the</strong> PS (Ciruna et al. 1997;Guo and Li 2007). The loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>4 is lethal at E4-5, due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> epiblast <strong>cells</strong> toundergo epi<strong>the</strong>lial-to-mesenchymal transition and migrate through <strong>the</strong> PS (Feldman et al.1995). <strong>FGF</strong>R1 –/– mice also die at gastrulation and both <strong>FGF</strong>4 and <strong>FGF</strong>R1 are expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ICM and PS (Deng et al. 1994; Yamaguchi et al. 1994). <strong>FGF</strong>4 is expressed <strong>in</strong> pluripotent m<strong>ES</strong><strong>cells</strong> and has been shown to be necessary for <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>in</strong>to ectoderm and mesoderml<strong>in</strong>eages, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a crucial role <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>4 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> (Kunath et al.2007). However, Wilder et al. showed that <strong>FGF</strong>4 –/– <strong>cells</strong> could differentiate <strong>in</strong> vitro, albeit at alow frequency, and gave rise to tumours consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> differentiated cell types<strong>in</strong> vivo (Wilder et al. 1997).In this study, we expand on our previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that active <strong>FGF</strong>-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is necessary for DEformation (Hansson et al. 2009), and <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> different <strong>FGF</strong>R-is<strong>of</strong>orms onmesendoderm and DE <strong>differentiation</strong>. We first analyse <strong>the</strong> expression patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>Ris<strong>of</strong>orms<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g DE and f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>FGF</strong>Rc-is<strong>of</strong>orms are up-regulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk culturewhereas <strong>FGF</strong>R2b and 4 are up-regulated specifically <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> DE-fraction. By means <strong>of</strong> reportercell l<strong>in</strong>es and antibody sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, we f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>FGF</strong>s activat<strong>in</strong>g primarily <strong>FGF</strong>Rc-is<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>in</strong>ducePS and mesendoderm markers T and Gsc but reduce <strong>the</strong> DE marker Sox17. <strong>FGF</strong>s activat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>FGF</strong>Rb-is<strong>of</strong>orms have no effect on ei<strong>the</strong>r cell type. The <strong>FGF</strong>Rc is<strong>of</strong>orm-activat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>FGF</strong>s show<strong>the</strong> highest mitogenic effects early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> period, and suggestively speeds up<strong>differentiation</strong>, as proliferation rates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>FGF</strong>s are reduced later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>culture period. Remarkably, an <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>e carry<strong>in</strong>g a knockout for one such <strong>FGF</strong>Rc is<strong>of</strong>ormactivat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>FGF</strong>, <strong>FGF</strong>4 –/– was able to differentiate to endoderm <strong>cells</strong> at levels comparable to wtand <strong>FGF</strong>4 +/– situations. The absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>4 gave rise to DE <strong>differentiation</strong>, and although afew <strong>cells</strong> sta<strong>in</strong>ed positive for <strong>the</strong> VE marker Sry-related HMG box 7 (SOX7), qPCR analysesconfirmed <strong>the</strong> DE fate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> culture. Thus, we conclude that <strong>FGF</strong>Rc-is<strong>of</strong>orms specify <strong>the</strong>mesendoderm but not DE cell population and that <strong>FGF</strong>4-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is dispensable for <strong>in</strong>duction<strong>of</strong> DE <strong>cells</strong>.Materials and MethodsCell culture and <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> m<strong>ES</strong>CsWe used <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>mouse</strong> <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es: E14 (Hooper et al. 1987), T-GFP (Fehl<strong>in</strong>g et al.2003), Gsc-GFP (Tada et al. 2005), Sox17-GFP (Kim et al. 2007), <strong>FGF</strong>4 +/– and <strong>FGF</strong>4 –/–(Wilder et al. 1997). Cells were grown as previously described (Y<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2003a; Hansson etal. 2009) on cell culture plastic ware (Nunc) coated with 0,1% gelat<strong>in</strong>e (Sigma), us<strong>in</strong>g 0,05%Tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA (Invitrogen) for dissociation <strong>of</strong> <strong>cells</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g passage. Tryps<strong>in</strong> was <strong>in</strong>activated byN2B27 medium: KO-DMEM supplemented with N2, B27, 0.1 mM non-essential am<strong>in</strong>o acids,2 mM L-glutam<strong>in</strong>e, Penicill<strong>in</strong>/Streptomyc<strong>in</strong> (all from Invitrogen), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol(Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were grown for at least 3 passages before onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong>.For <strong>differentiation</strong> purposes, <strong>cells</strong> were dissociated <strong>in</strong>to s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>cells</strong> and seeded at 2.000 <strong>cells</strong>/cm 2 <strong>in</strong> N2B27 medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g growth factors: BMP4 (10ng/ml), activ<strong>in</strong>A (1 or 30 ng/ml; both from R&D Systems), <strong>FGF</strong>1 (100 ng/ml; ChemiconInternational), <strong>FGF</strong>2 (100 ng/ml; Invitrogen), <strong>FGF</strong>4, <strong>FGF</strong>5, <strong>FGF</strong>6, <strong>FGF</strong>7, <strong>FGF</strong>8b, <strong>FGF</strong>8c,<strong>FGF</strong>8e, <strong>FGF</strong>9, <strong>FGF</strong>10, <strong>FGF</strong>16 (5 or 100 ng/ml; all from R&D Systems). Media conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>FGF</strong>s were supplemented with 10 µg/ml heparan sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich).Flow cytometryFor GFP-analysis <strong>of</strong> reporter cell l<strong>in</strong>es, live <strong>cells</strong> were dissociated <strong>in</strong>to s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>cells</strong> by 0,05%Tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA (Invitrogen) and analysed by FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!