IntroductionBased on knowledge obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> developmental biology, <strong>mouse</strong> embryonic stem (m<strong>ES</strong>) <strong>cells</strong>can be directed <strong>towards</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>in</strong>to specific germ layers and more mature tissues. Sucha <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>in</strong>to glucose-responsive β cell-like <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-secret<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cells</strong>, serves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory as acure for type I diabetes mellitus (McCall et al. 2010). For this purpose, <strong>the</strong> first step is togenerate def<strong>in</strong>itive endoderm (DE) with <strong>the</strong> potential to fur<strong>the</strong>r differentiate <strong>in</strong>to <strong>cells</strong>resembl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> primitive gut tube (reviewed by (Van Ho<strong>of</strong> et al. 2009)). Understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> role<strong>of</strong> each component used <strong>in</strong> this directed <strong>differentiation</strong> is crucial for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> optimalprogenitor cell population <strong>in</strong> each step.In <strong>the</strong> late blastocyst stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>mouse</strong> embryo (E4.5), <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner cell mass (ICM) isdivided <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> epiblast and <strong>the</strong> primitive, later visceral endoderm. The visceral endoderm(VE) is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> asymmetric anterior-posterior pattern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> epiblast, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>onset <strong>of</strong> gastrulation (reviewed by (Rossant 2004)). In <strong>the</strong> gastrulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>mouse</strong> embryo, epiblast<strong>cells</strong> migrate through <strong>the</strong> primitive streak (PS), and <strong>in</strong> this process become determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>towards</strong>ei<strong>the</strong>r mesoderm or DE germ layers (Lawson et al. 1991; Tam et al. 1993; Carey et al. 1995).The transform<strong>in</strong>g growth factor-β family member nodal, an activator <strong>of</strong> SMAD2/3 <strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, is<strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiator <strong>of</strong> epiblast pattern<strong>in</strong>g and PS formation (Conlon et al. 1994; Waldrip et al.1998). At high levels, nodal <strong>in</strong>duces anterior PS structures and DE and at low doses it <strong>in</strong>ducesmore posterior streak fates (Ben-Haim et al. 2006). At <strong>the</strong> posterior-most end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PS, bonemorphogenetic prote<strong>in</strong> 4 (BMP4) is produced by <strong>the</strong> extra-embryonic ectoderm and establishesa signal gradient. BMP4 is critical for formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PS and <strong>in</strong>duces mesoderm formation(reviewed by (Gadue et al. 2005)). It is currently accepted that <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mesoderm andendoderm tissues arise from a common progenitor cell population, <strong>the</strong> mesendoderm (Lawsonet al. 1991; K<strong>in</strong>der et al. 2001). The PS marker Brachyury (T) is expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nascent andmigrat<strong>in</strong>g mesoderm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primitive streak dur<strong>in</strong>g gastrulation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>mouse</strong> embryo (Kispertand Herrmann 1994). Goosecoid (Gsc) is located <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> progress<strong>in</strong>g primitive streak at E6.5,and later localizes to <strong>the</strong> anterior streak, from which <strong>the</strong> DE arises (Blum et al. 1992). It is<strong>in</strong>duced by high concentrations <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> animal cap explants from Xenopus and <strong>in</strong> m<strong>ES</strong><strong>cells</strong>, it is used as a marker for <strong>the</strong> mesendoderm cell population (Kubo et al. 2004; Gadue et al.2006). Sry-related HMG box gene 17 (Sox17) is an early marker specifically expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itive endoderm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gastrula, and later expands to <strong>the</strong> endoderm underly<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> neuralplate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early-bud-stage embryo (Kanai-Azuma et al. 2002). Sox17 is also expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>extra-embryonic, but not <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> embryonic visceral endoderm.In m<strong>ES</strong> cell cultures, <strong>cells</strong> take on a mesendoderm-type fate before be<strong>in</strong>g committed to ei<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong> mesoderm or DE l<strong>in</strong>eages (Tada et al. 2005). Activ<strong>in</strong>A (activ<strong>in</strong> hereafter) is used as asurrogate for nodal as <strong>the</strong>y both activate SMAD2/3 <strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> by b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> ALK4 receptor,thus function<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same manner (Schier 2003). In <strong>the</strong> mesendoderm population, highconcentrations <strong>of</strong> nodal/ activ<strong>in</strong>-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>duce anterior streak and DE <strong>cells</strong> while BMP4 orlow concentrations <strong>of</strong> nodal/ activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duce posterior streak or mesoderm (Kubo et al. 2004;Willems and Leyns 2008; Hansson et al. 2009). The PS genes T, Mix-like 1 (Mixl1) and Gsc areexpressed <strong>in</strong> this population <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g concentrations <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong>. High activ<strong>in</strong>levelsfur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>duce <strong>the</strong> DE markers Sox17, E-cadher<strong>in</strong> and Forkhead box A2 (Foxa2). BMP4<strong>in</strong>duces T, Mixl1 and <strong>the</strong> mesodermal marker Fetal like k<strong>in</strong>ase 1 (Flk1; VEGFR2/ Kdr; (Gadueet al. 2005)). Dur<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>ES</strong> cell <strong>differentiation</strong>, T-express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cells</strong> give rise to endoderm andmesoderm derivatives (Kubo et al. 2004) and we have previously shown that a T-GFP reportercell l<strong>in</strong>e (T Gfp/ + ; (Fehl<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2003)) can be activated by BMP4 and a low concentration <strong>of</strong>activ<strong>in</strong> (Hansson et al. 2009).For <strong>the</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> mesendoderm and DE to occur properly <strong>in</strong> m<strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong>, fibroblastgrowth factor (<strong>FGF</strong>)-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is required (Funa et al. 2008; Morrison et al. 2008; Willems andLeyns 2008; Hansson et al. 2009). The <strong>FGF</strong> family <strong>of</strong> prote<strong>in</strong>s consists <strong>of</strong> 22 members named<strong>FGF</strong>1-23 (<strong>FGF</strong>15 is <strong>the</strong> <strong>mouse</strong> ortholog <strong>of</strong> human <strong>FGF</strong>19). They activate one or more <strong>of</strong> fourreceptor tyros<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ases, <strong>the</strong> <strong>FGF</strong> receptors (<strong>FGF</strong>Rs)1-4. <strong>FGF</strong>Rs1-3 have two secreted splice60
variants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir Ig-like doma<strong>in</strong> III, <strong>the</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>R(III)b or <strong>FGF</strong>R(III)c is<strong>of</strong>orms (hereafter <strong>FGF</strong>Rbor <strong>FGF</strong>Rc, respectively; (Ornitz and Itoh 2001; Itoh and Ornitz 2004)). <strong>FGF</strong>s are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>many functions such as germ layer formation, limb development, cell proliferation and cellmigration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g embryo (Ornitz and Itoh 2001). In early <strong>mouse</strong> development, <strong>FGF</strong><strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong>is necessary for <strong>the</strong> migration <strong>of</strong> epiblast <strong>cells</strong> through <strong>the</strong> PS (Ciruna et al. 1997;Guo and Li 2007). The loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>4 is lethal at E4-5, due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> epiblast <strong>cells</strong> toundergo epi<strong>the</strong>lial-to-mesenchymal transition and migrate through <strong>the</strong> PS (Feldman et al.1995). <strong>FGF</strong>R1 –/– mice also die at gastrulation and both <strong>FGF</strong>4 and <strong>FGF</strong>R1 are expressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ICM and PS (Deng et al. 1994; Yamaguchi et al. 1994). <strong>FGF</strong>4 is expressed <strong>in</strong> pluripotent m<strong>ES</strong><strong>cells</strong> and has been shown to be necessary for <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>in</strong>to ectoderm and mesoderml<strong>in</strong>eages, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a crucial role <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>4 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> (Kunath et al.2007). However, Wilder et al. showed that <strong>FGF</strong>4 –/– <strong>cells</strong> could differentiate <strong>in</strong> vitro, albeit at alow frequency, and gave rise to tumours consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> differentiated cell types<strong>in</strong> vivo (Wilder et al. 1997).In this study, we expand on our previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that active <strong>FGF</strong>-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is necessary for DEformation (Hansson et al. 2009), and <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> different <strong>FGF</strong>R-is<strong>of</strong>orms onmesendoderm and DE <strong>differentiation</strong>. We first analyse <strong>the</strong> expression patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>Ris<strong>of</strong>orms<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form<strong>in</strong>g DE and f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>FGF</strong>Rc-is<strong>of</strong>orms are up-regulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk culturewhereas <strong>FGF</strong>R2b and 4 are up-regulated specifically <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> DE-fraction. By means <strong>of</strong> reportercell l<strong>in</strong>es and antibody sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, we f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>FGF</strong>s activat<strong>in</strong>g primarily <strong>FGF</strong>Rc-is<strong>of</strong>orms <strong>in</strong>ducePS and mesendoderm markers T and Gsc but reduce <strong>the</strong> DE marker Sox17. <strong>FGF</strong>s activat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>FGF</strong>Rb-is<strong>of</strong>orms have no effect on ei<strong>the</strong>r cell type. The <strong>FGF</strong>Rc is<strong>of</strong>orm-activat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>FGF</strong>s show<strong>the</strong> highest mitogenic effects early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> period, and suggestively speeds up<strong>differentiation</strong>, as proliferation rates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>FGF</strong>s are reduced later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>culture period. Remarkably, an <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>e carry<strong>in</strong>g a knockout for one such <strong>FGF</strong>Rc is<strong>of</strong>ormactivat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>FGF</strong>, <strong>FGF</strong>4 –/– was able to differentiate to endoderm <strong>cells</strong> at levels comparable to wtand <strong>FGF</strong>4 +/– situations. The absence <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong>4 gave rise to DE <strong>differentiation</strong>, and although afew <strong>cells</strong> sta<strong>in</strong>ed positive for <strong>the</strong> VE marker Sry-related HMG box 7 (SOX7), qPCR analysesconfirmed <strong>the</strong> DE fate <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> culture. Thus, we conclude that <strong>FGF</strong>Rc-is<strong>of</strong>orms specify <strong>the</strong>mesendoderm but not DE cell population and that <strong>FGF</strong>4-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is dispensable for <strong>in</strong>duction<strong>of</strong> DE <strong>cells</strong>.Materials and MethodsCell culture and <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> m<strong>ES</strong>CsWe used <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>mouse</strong> <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es: E14 (Hooper et al. 1987), T-GFP (Fehl<strong>in</strong>g et al.2003), Gsc-GFP (Tada et al. 2005), Sox17-GFP (Kim et al. 2007), <strong>FGF</strong>4 +/– and <strong>FGF</strong>4 –/–(Wilder et al. 1997). Cells were grown as previously described (Y<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2003a; Hansson etal. 2009) on cell culture plastic ware (Nunc) coated with 0,1% gelat<strong>in</strong>e (Sigma), us<strong>in</strong>g 0,05%Tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA (Invitrogen) for dissociation <strong>of</strong> <strong>cells</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g passage. Tryps<strong>in</strong> was <strong>in</strong>activated byN2B27 medium: KO-DMEM supplemented with N2, B27, 0.1 mM non-essential am<strong>in</strong>o acids,2 mM L-glutam<strong>in</strong>e, Penicill<strong>in</strong>/Streptomyc<strong>in</strong> (all from Invitrogen), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol(Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were grown for at least 3 passages before onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong>.For <strong>differentiation</strong> purposes, <strong>cells</strong> were dissociated <strong>in</strong>to s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>cells</strong> and seeded at 2.000 <strong>cells</strong>/cm 2 <strong>in</strong> N2B27 medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g growth factors: BMP4 (10ng/ml), activ<strong>in</strong>A (1 or 30 ng/ml; both from R&D Systems), <strong>FGF</strong>1 (100 ng/ml; ChemiconInternational), <strong>FGF</strong>2 (100 ng/ml; Invitrogen), <strong>FGF</strong>4, <strong>FGF</strong>5, <strong>FGF</strong>6, <strong>FGF</strong>7, <strong>FGF</strong>8b, <strong>FGF</strong>8c,<strong>FGF</strong>8e, <strong>FGF</strong>9, <strong>FGF</strong>10, <strong>FGF</strong>16 (5 or 100 ng/ml; all from R&D Systems). Media conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>FGF</strong>s were supplemented with 10 µg/ml heparan sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich).Flow cytometryFor GFP-analysis <strong>of</strong> reporter cell l<strong>in</strong>es, live <strong>cells</strong> were dissociated <strong>in</strong>to s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>cells</strong> by 0,05%Tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA (Invitrogen) and analysed by FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).61
- Page 1:
PhD thesisCand.scient. Janny Marie
- Page 5:
ResuméSukkersyge er en sygdom der
- Page 9:
Table of contents1
- Page 12 and 13:
ICMinner cell massIdInhibitor of di
- Page 14 and 15:
cell mass regenerates probably thro
- Page 16 and 17: Figure 1-1: Early embryo developmen
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 1-3: Regional expression of
- Page 20 and 21: The pluripotent stateThe pluripoten
- Page 25 and 26: There are four membrane-bound FGFRs
- Page 27: 2. AimsThe aim of this study was to
- Page 30 and 31: Developmental Biology 330 (2009) 28
- Page 32 and 33: 288 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 34 and 35: 290 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 36 and 37: 292 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 38 and 39: 294 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 40 and 41: 296 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 42 and 43: 298 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 44 and 45: 300 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 46 and 47: 302 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 48 and 49: 304 M. Hansson et al. / Development
- Page 50 and 51: Figure S2Figure S2: A subpopulation
- Page 52 and 53: Figure S4Figure S4: Expression of T
- Page 54 and 55: Figure S6Figure S6: qRT-PCR analyse
- Page 56 and 57: epithelium; Cdx2, expressed posteri
- Page 58 and 59: Figure 4-4: A high FGF4-concentrati
- Page 60 and 61: Figure 4-6: A 3-step protocol does
- Page 63 and 64: 5. Paper IIFGFR(IIIc)-activation in
- Page 65: AbstractProgress in embryonic stem
- Page 69 and 70: Cell count and proliferation assayC
- Page 71 and 72: influence on the numbers of Sox17-G
- Page 73 and 74: undifferentiated cells, we found th
- Page 75 and 76: FGF4, 5, FGF8b and FGFR1, are expre
- Page 77 and 78: with EdU-stain (blue sample); and w
- Page 79 and 80: Olsen, S.K., J.Y. Li, C. Bromleigh,
- Page 81 and 82: FiguresFigure 1: Screen for FGFR-is
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 3: Activation of FGFRb or FG
- Page 87 and 88: Opposite, Figure 6: In the absence
- Page 89 and 90: 6. General discussionEndoderm diffe
- Page 91 and 92: Overall, the multitude of FGF-signa
- Page 93 and 94: transplantation is the spread of an
- Page 96: AcknowledgementsThe work presented
- Page 99 and 100: Chambers, I., D. Colby, M. Robertso
- Page 101 and 102: Hawkins, V.J. Wroblewski, D.S. Li,
- Page 103 and 104: Nishikawa, S.I., S. Nishikawa, M. H
- Page 105 and 106: Tanimizu, N., H. Saito, K. Mostov,