10.07.2015 Views

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M. Hansson et al. / Developmental Biology 330 (2009) 286–304297Fig. 9. <strong>FGF</strong> receptor signal<strong>in</strong>g is required throughout <strong>the</strong> five day period for activ<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced Gsc expression but only required late for activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> Sox17-express<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>itiveendoderm. Gsc Gfp/+ and Sox17 Gfp/+ <strong>cells</strong> were cultured <strong>in</strong> medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 100 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with 100 ng/ml <strong>FGF</strong>2, 10 μM SU5402, 100 nM PD173074, or solubleforms <strong>of</strong> <strong>FGF</strong> receptors as <strong>in</strong>dicated. (A) Time course analysis <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> Gsc-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> by flow cytometry at time 0 and after 3 and 5 days <strong>in</strong> culture. (B) Gsc Gfp/+ and Sox17 Gfp/+<strong>cells</strong> were analyzed for GFP expression at day 5 after culture with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicated factors. (C) Gsc Gfp/+ and Sox17 Gfp/+ <strong>cells</strong> were analyzed for GFP expression at day 5 after culture withactiv<strong>in</strong> and ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>FGF</strong>2, SU5402, or PD173074 for shorted periods as <strong>in</strong>dicated. The mean % GFP + <strong>cells</strong> ±standard deviation <strong>of</strong> three <strong>in</strong>dependent experiments is presented.identity, were affected by block<strong>in</strong>g <strong>FGF</strong> receptor signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> activ<strong>in</strong>treated<strong>cells</strong>. Expression <strong>of</strong> Otx2, Chrd, and Cer1, genes that arerepressed by BMP4, is not affected by <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> SU5402 after3days(Fig. 10). Among <strong>the</strong> markers analyzed only Bmp2, which is firstexpressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> embryo proper at E7.5 just lateral to <strong>the</strong> anteriorneural folds and <strong>in</strong> precardiac mesoderm and slightly later <strong>in</strong> foregutendoderm (W<strong>in</strong>nier et al., 1995), is repressed both by BMP4 andSU5402 at day 3. Chrd expression appears at day 3 <strong>in</strong> vehicle-treatedcultures and at day 5 <strong>in</strong> BMP4-treated cultures but <strong>in</strong> both cases it issensitive to SU5402. Also BMP4-<strong>in</strong>duced expression <strong>of</strong> mesodermmarkers Chrd, and Nog at day 5, as well as <strong>the</strong> posterior markers Bmp4and Cdx2, is sensitive to SU5402 (Fig. 10 and Fig. S4).Foregut and pancreatic competence <strong>of</strong> <strong>ES</strong> cell-derived endodermTo test if <strong>the</strong> DE-like <strong>cells</strong> had potential to functionally <strong>in</strong>tegrate<strong>in</strong>to develop<strong>in</strong>g embryonic endoderm, we implanted approximately50 <strong>cells</strong> labeled with a fluorescent dye <strong>in</strong>to 6 to 10 somite stage chickenembryos at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prospective pancreatic endoderm and<strong>in</strong>cubated for 48 h. When <strong>ES</strong> cell progeny from activ<strong>in</strong>-treated cultureswere grafted, 15 out <strong>of</strong> 21 transplanted embryos conta<strong>in</strong>ed dyelabeled,Foxa2 + <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> endoderm. In contrast, only3 out <strong>of</strong> 20 embryos receiv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cells</strong> cultured without activ<strong>in</strong> and 0 <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> 8 embryos receiv<strong>in</strong>g activ<strong>in</strong>- and BMP4-treated <strong>cells</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>eddye-labeled cell <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> endoderm (Figs. 11A, D, G). Frequently, <strong>the</strong>activ<strong>in</strong>-treated <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nkx6-1 + Pdx1 + pancreaticendoderm (Figs. 11E, F) (Pedersen et al., 2005). In a second series <strong>of</strong>graft<strong>in</strong>g experiments we tested if <strong>the</strong> Sox17-GFP Hi <strong>cells</strong> obta<strong>in</strong>ed afteractiv<strong>in</strong> treatment for 5 days with or without additional Dkk1 treatmentwere capable <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to chick foregut endoderm. Such <strong>cells</strong>were equally capable <strong>of</strong> contribut<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> foregut endoderm (Figs.11H, I, K–M), although <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> Sox17-GFP Hi <strong>cells</strong> were reduced<strong>in</strong> cultures conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Dkk1. Orthogonal projections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> confocalstacks obta<strong>in</strong>ed from grafted embryos suggested expression <strong>of</strong> Nkx6-1<strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grafted <strong>cells</strong> (Fig. 11J). Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> anterior markersexpressed by activ<strong>in</strong>-treated <strong>cells</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> pancreatic or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!