10.07.2015 Views

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290 M. Hansson et al. / Developmental Biology 330 (2009) 286–304Fig. 2. BMP4 but not Wnt3a <strong>in</strong>hibits <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> Foxa2 and E-cadher<strong>in</strong>, and promotes expression <strong>of</strong> Flk1 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong>. The expression <strong>of</strong> Foxa2, E-cad (Cdh1), and Flk1(β-gal) was analyzed by immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence <strong>in</strong> Flk1 LacZ/+ <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> cultured for 5 days <strong>in</strong> media conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0, 3 or 100 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong>, 100 ng/ml Wnt3a, 10 ng/ml BMP4, 100 ng/mlactiv<strong>in</strong>+100 ng/ml Wnt3a, or 100 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong>+ 10 ng/ml BMP4.<strong>cells</strong> such that low doses will activate T and high doses will activate Gsc(Dyson and Gurdon, 1998; Green et al., 1992; Gurdon et al., 1994, 1999;Lat<strong>in</strong>kic et al., 1997), we <strong>in</strong>itially tested if exposure <strong>of</strong> m<strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> to<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g doses <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> would lead to a shift from T to Gscexpression. <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es carry<strong>in</strong>g T-Gfp (T Gfp/+ ) and Gsc-Gfp (Gsc Gfp/+ )knock-<strong>in</strong> alleles (Fehl<strong>in</strong>g et al., 2003; Tada et al., 2005) were culturedwith <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g amounts <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> (from 3 to 100 ng/ml) and <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> GFP + <strong>cells</strong> was analyzed by flow cytometry. Examples <strong>of</strong>primary flow cytometry diagrams are shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. S1. When GFP +<strong>cells</strong> were quantitated we found that 3 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong> transiently<strong>in</strong>duced 21±15% T-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> (mean %±S.D., n=3) peak<strong>in</strong>g at day 4(Fig. 1A). However, this <strong>in</strong>duction was not statistically significant. Athigher activ<strong>in</strong> concentrations <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> T-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>edgradually such that <strong>the</strong> highest dose (100 ng/ml) resulted <strong>in</strong> only5±4% T-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> at day 4, comparable to <strong>the</strong> control samplescultured <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> (6±5% T-GFP + <strong>cells</strong>, Fig. 1A). Incontrast, flow cytometric analyses <strong>of</strong> Gsc Gfp/+ <strong>cells</strong> showed that <strong>the</strong>expression <strong>of</strong> this anterior PS marker (Blum et al., 1992) was <strong>in</strong>ducedby activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a dose-dependent manner with expression peak<strong>in</strong>g atdays 5–6 (Fig. 1B). 3 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duced 25±4% Gsc-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> atday 5, and this number <strong>in</strong>creased with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g concentration <strong>of</strong>activ<strong>in</strong> reach<strong>in</strong>g 43±11% Gsc-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong> cultures treated with100 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong> (Fig. 1B). Control samples grown <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong>activ<strong>in</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ed 3 ±4% Gsc-GFP + <strong>cells</strong> at this time po<strong>in</strong>t. The<strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> Gsc expression at day 5 was statistically significant forall activ<strong>in</strong> concentrations tested (pb0.05). Thus, similar to <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong>Xenopus animal cap <strong>cells</strong>, low doses <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> support T expressionwhile high doses stimulate Gsc expression. Intrigu<strong>in</strong>gly, while

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!