10.07.2015 Views

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

M. Hansson et al. / Developmental Biology 330 (2009) 286–304289specific secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories)and 4′,6-diamid<strong>in</strong>o-2-phenyl<strong>in</strong>dole (DAPI, MP Biomedicals).The Lhx1 sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g used tyramide signal amplification (Perk<strong>in</strong>Elmer)accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> manufacturer's recommendations. Negative controls,where <strong>the</strong> primary antibodies were omitted, were <strong>in</strong>cluded for allsta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gs. These controls showed no unspecific sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>secondary antibodies (data not shown). β-galactosidase activity wasvisualized by add<strong>in</strong>g X-gal sta<strong>in</strong> solution for 4 h at 37 °C. The slideswere analyzed us<strong>in</strong>g an LSM 510 META laser scann<strong>in</strong>g microscope(Carl Zeiss) or a BX60 epifluorescence microscope equipped with aDP71 camera (both from Olympus).RT-PCR and qPCRCells were dissociated us<strong>in</strong>g 0.05% Tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA and collected bycentrifugation. Total RNA was isolated us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> RNeasy kit withDNAse treatment (Qiagen) follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> manufacturer's protocol.cDNA was prepared from 5 or 100 ng RNA us<strong>in</strong>g MMLV ReverseTranscriptase (Invitrogen). PCR reactions were performed us<strong>in</strong>g 1 μlcDNA, 1 μl 20μM primer mix and 23 μl Reddy Mix PCR master mix(Abgene). The PCR was carried out with an <strong>in</strong>itial denaturation step at96 °C for 2 m<strong>in</strong>, followed by 32–38 cycles <strong>of</strong> 96 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for30 s and 72 °C for 1 m<strong>in</strong>. The PCR was f<strong>in</strong>ished with a f<strong>in</strong>al extensionstep at 72 °C for 5 m<strong>in</strong>. QPCR was performed us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> standard SYBR ®Green program with dissociation curve <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mx3005P (Stratagene).PCR reaction was run <strong>in</strong> duplicates us<strong>in</strong>g 5 μl Brilliant ® SYBR ® GreenQPCR Master Mix (Stratagene), 1 μl cDNA, 1 μl 10μM primer mix and3 μl DEPC-treated water. Quantified values for each gene <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terestwere normalized aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>put determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> housekeep<strong>in</strong>ggenes G6pdh and Tbp. The results are expressed as <strong>the</strong> relativeexpression level compared with <strong>the</strong> vehicle control condition or <strong>the</strong>scrambled control siRNA <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vehicle condition. Primer sequencesare available on request.siRNA transfectionThe sequence effective for <strong>mouse</strong> β-caten<strong>in</strong> knock-down wasdesigned us<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>of</strong>tware available at <strong>the</strong> web site <strong>of</strong> Invitrogen(http://rnaidesigner.<strong>in</strong>vitrogen.com/rnaiexpress/). The β-caten<strong>in</strong>(accession number NM_0079614.2) target sequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> STEALTHsiRNAs were 5′-GCCTTCATTATGGACTGCCTGTTGT-3′ (siRNA1) and 5′-GAGCAAGGCTTTTCCCAGTCCTTCA-3′ (siRNA2). The STEALTH negativecontrol siRNA (scrambled; Invitrogen) has been used as negativecontrol and is labeled “scrambled”.The <strong>cells</strong> were cultured on gelat<strong>in</strong>-treated 24-well plates aspreviously described with a start<strong>in</strong>g density <strong>of</strong> 4000 <strong>cells</strong>/cm 2 .After1 day <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>cells</strong> were transfected with 100 nMSTEALTH siRNAs us<strong>in</strong>g Lip<strong>of</strong>ectam<strong>in</strong>e2000 accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> manufacturer's<strong>in</strong>structions. The transfected <strong>cells</strong> were grown fur<strong>the</strong>r andanalyzed for β-caten<strong>in</strong> expression by western blot at days 3 and 5 <strong>of</strong><strong>differentiation</strong>. QPCR and flow cytometry analysis was performed atday 5.Western blotTotal cell lysates were obta<strong>in</strong>ed on days 3 and 5 <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong>culture us<strong>in</strong>g RIPA lysis buffer. 20 μg <strong>of</strong> each prote<strong>in</strong> sample wereloaded and analyzed by western blot us<strong>in</strong>g a rabbit anti-β-caten<strong>in</strong>monoclonal antibody (Lab Vision) and a <strong>mouse</strong> anti-β-Act<strong>in</strong>monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) as primary antibodies aswell as secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies (Santa CruzBiotechnology).Generation <strong>of</strong> stable Wnt-reporter <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>es and chimera formationThe SuTOP-CFP construct was generated by cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> luciferasegene from <strong>the</strong> Super8XTOPFLASH Wnt reporter (generously providedby Dr. R. Moon, University <strong>of</strong> Seattle, WA) with Fse and Nco1 andreplac<strong>in</strong>g it with Cerulean PCR product from <strong>the</strong> pmCerulean-C1vector (Rizzo et al., 2004). To generate stably transfected cell l<strong>in</strong>es, E14<strong>cells</strong> (Hooper et al., 1987) <strong>of</strong> low passage number were co-transfectedwith SuTOP-CFP and a ploxP-Neo vector, conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance toNeomyc<strong>in</strong>. The relationship between plasmids was 10:1 (reporter:ploxP-Neo). Transfection was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g Lip<strong>of</strong>ectam<strong>in</strong>e2000(Invitrogen) and 24 h after transfection, selection was added (200 μg/ml G418, Invitrogen). Medium was changed daily for 9 days and0.5 μM BIO (GSK3β <strong>in</strong>hibitor, Calbiochem), which activates canonicalWnt signal<strong>in</strong>g, was added to <strong>the</strong> medium for <strong>the</strong> last 2 days <strong>of</strong>selection to identify Wnt-responsive colonies. Fluorescent colonieswere <strong>the</strong>n picked and expanded and one clone was selected forchimera formation via blastocyst <strong>in</strong>jection.E3.5 blastocysts were harvested by flush<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> uteri <strong>of</strong> mature,time mated NMRI mice (Taconic). Chimeric embryos were generatedby <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>of</strong> approximately 10 SuTOP-CFP <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>blastocoel us<strong>in</strong>g a paraff<strong>in</strong>-oil driven manual <strong>in</strong>jector (Cell TramVario, Eppendorf) and a Narishige micromanipulator. Follow<strong>in</strong>g 3 h <strong>of</strong>culture <strong>in</strong> M16 medium, embryos were transferred to <strong>the</strong> uterus <strong>of</strong>E2.5 pseudo-pregnant, 7 week old NMRI foster mo<strong>the</strong>rs. Care <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>animals was done accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>stitutional guidel<strong>in</strong>es. Embryos wereharvested at E10.5 and fixed <strong>in</strong> Lilly's fixative (4% phosphate bufferedformaldehyde) for 30 m<strong>in</strong> before be<strong>in</strong>g analyzed for native Ceruleanfluorescence. All animal experiments were performed <strong>in</strong> accordancewith <strong>in</strong>stitutional and national regulations.Chick embryo graft<strong>in</strong>gFertilized eggs from white leghorn chicken were purchased fromTriova and <strong>in</strong>cubated at 38 °C to Hamburger and Hamilton (HH) stages8–10 (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951). The embryos were explantedas previously described (Chapman et al., 2001). E14 <strong>ES</strong> cell progenywas prepared for graft<strong>in</strong>g by label<strong>in</strong>g with fluorescent CMTMRCellTracker dye (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen). Clumps <strong>of</strong> <strong>cells</strong> werescraped <strong>of</strong>f, washed <strong>in</strong> PBS and <strong>in</strong>serted between endoderm andmesoderm <strong>of</strong> chicken embryos via a small <strong>in</strong>cision <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> endoderm.Grafted embryos were <strong>in</strong>cubated for 48 h <strong>in</strong> a humidified <strong>in</strong>cubator at38 °C. The embryos were isolated, washed <strong>in</strong> PBS, fixed <strong>in</strong> 4% PFA atroom temperature for 2 h and stored <strong>in</strong> methanol at −20 °C until <strong>the</strong>time <strong>of</strong> analysis. Whole-mount immun<strong>of</strong>luorescent analyses <strong>of</strong>grafted chicken embryos were performed as previously described(Ahnfelt-Ronne et al., 2007).ResultsDose-dependent effects <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> on <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> PS genes aremodulated by BMP and Wnt signal<strong>in</strong>gPrevious studies have demonstrated <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> Brachyury (T) andGoosecoid (Gsc) by activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> m<strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> (Gadue et al., 2006; Kubo et al.,2004; Tada et al., 2005; Yasunaga et al., 2005). However, differences <strong>in</strong>media compositions and <strong>the</strong> culture methods used make a directcomparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> response <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two genes to vary<strong>in</strong>g doses <strong>of</strong>activ<strong>in</strong> difficult. Prior to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> by addition <strong>of</strong>growth factors, we culture <strong>the</strong> undifferentiated <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> under def<strong>in</strong>edconditions (Y<strong>in</strong>g et al., 2003a). As activ<strong>in</strong> is known to dosedependentlyregulate T and Gsc expression <strong>in</strong> Xenopus animal capFig. 1. Activ<strong>in</strong>, BMP and Wnt signal<strong>in</strong>g control <strong>the</strong> dynamic expression <strong>of</strong> primitive streak genes <strong>in</strong> differentiat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong>. Flow cytometric analysis <strong>of</strong> T Gfp/+ (A), Gsc Gfp/+ (B), orMixl1 Gfp/+ (C) <strong>cells</strong> grown <strong>in</strong> adherent culture for up to 6 days <strong>in</strong> serum-free media conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 0, 3, 10, 30 or 100 ng/ml activ<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence or absence <strong>of</strong> 10 ng/ml BMP4 or100 ng/ml Wnt3a. The mean % GFP + <strong>cells</strong> ±standard deviation <strong>of</strong> three <strong>in</strong>dependent experiments is presented.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!