10.07.2015 Views

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M. Hansson et al. / Developmental Biology 330 (2009) 286–304287embryo <strong>in</strong>teracts with o<strong>the</strong>r signal<strong>in</strong>g pathways such as <strong>the</strong> BMP, Wnt,and <strong>FGF</strong> pathways (reviewed <strong>in</strong> Tam and Loebel, 2007), we addresshere <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se signals and <strong>the</strong>ir potential to modulate activ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ducedmesendodermal <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> m<strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> grown understandard conditions <strong>in</strong> feeder- and serum-free adherent monoculture(Y<strong>in</strong>g et al., 2003a,b). We use <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g reporter genes (lacZor GFP) targeted to <strong>the</strong> T (Fehl<strong>in</strong>g et al., 2003), Mixl1 (Hart et al.,2002), Gsc (Tada et al., 2005), Flk1 (Shalaby et al., 1995), Sox17 (Kim etal., 2007), and Sox2 (Li et al., 1998) loci to monitor, over time, <strong>the</strong>effects <strong>of</strong> different growth factors on <strong>the</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> markersspecific to different anterior and posterior regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> PS andderivatives <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong>. We confirm and extend previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs on <strong>the</strong>ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g concentrations <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong> to progressively <strong>in</strong>ducemore <strong>ES</strong> cell progeny to an anterior PS fate. Remarkably, while <strong>the</strong>number <strong>of</strong> Gsc- and Sox17-express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gactiv<strong>in</strong> concentration, <strong>the</strong> highest number <strong>of</strong> T-express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cells</strong> isfound at <strong>the</strong> lowest activ<strong>in</strong> concentration, similar to <strong>the</strong> activ<strong>in</strong>response seen <strong>in</strong> Xenopus animal cap <strong>cells</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, expression <strong>of</strong>Gsc and o<strong>the</strong>r anterior markers <strong>in</strong>duced at high activ<strong>in</strong> doses isprevented by simultaneous treatment with BMP4 which redirectsdevelopment <strong>towards</strong> mesodermal fates, also similar to results fromXenopus. Extend<strong>in</strong>g previous work, we f<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong>canonical Wnt signal<strong>in</strong>g by treatment with Dkk1 is able to preventactiv<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced development <strong>of</strong> endodermal <strong>cells</strong> but only at latestages <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong>. Dkk1 also <strong>in</strong>hibits activ<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced Mixl1-expression and consistent with this f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Wnt3a and activ<strong>in</strong> actadditively on Mixl1 expression but not on Gsc expression. Wnt3a byitself appears to <strong>in</strong>duce only posterior PS fates depend<strong>in</strong>g, however, onendogenous Smad2/3 signal<strong>in</strong>g. Additionally, we demonstrate that<strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> anterior and posterior PS fates by activ<strong>in</strong> or BMP4,respectively, is dependent on <strong>FGF</strong> signal<strong>in</strong>g. Lastly, we demonstrate for<strong>the</strong> first time that activ<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced DE derived from m<strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> can<strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g foregut endoderm when implanted<strong>in</strong>to chicken embryos but respond only to a limited degree toposterioriz<strong>in</strong>g cues <strong>in</strong> vitro by <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g expression <strong>of</strong> regional foregutmarkers.Materials and methodsCell culture and <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>ES</strong>CsMouse <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> (40,000 <strong>cells</strong>/cm 2 ) were kept undifferentiated ongelat<strong>in</strong>-coated cell culture plastic (Nunc) <strong>in</strong> serum-free medium; KO-DMEM supplemented with N2, B27, 0.1 mM nonessential am<strong>in</strong>o acids,2 mM L-glutam<strong>in</strong>e, Penicill<strong>in</strong>/Streptomyc<strong>in</strong> (all from Invitrogen),0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), 1500 U/ml leukemia<strong>in</strong>hibitory factor (LIF, Chemicon) and 10 ng/ml BMP4 (R&D Systems),essentially as described by Y<strong>in</strong>g et al. (2003a). <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> were passagedevery second day with daily media changes for at least three passages(6 days) prior to <strong>in</strong>itiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> studies.For <strong>differentiation</strong> experiments <strong>cells</strong> grown as described abovewere dissociated to s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>cells</strong> and <strong>differentiation</strong> was <strong>in</strong>duced byseed<strong>in</strong>g 2000 <strong>cells</strong>/cm 2 on gelat<strong>in</strong>-coated cell culture plastic <strong>in</strong> KO-DMEM supplemented with N2, B27, 0.1 mM nonessential am<strong>in</strong>o acids,2 mM L-glutam<strong>in</strong>e, Penicill<strong>in</strong>/Streptomyc<strong>in</strong> (all from Invitrogen),0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) without LIF and BMP4.The medium was supplemented with one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>ggrowth factors, soluble receptors, and small molecule compounds:activ<strong>in</strong> (3, 10, 30 or 100 ng/ml), Wnt3a (5 or 100 ng/ml), Nodal(1 µg/ml), BMP4 (10 ng/ml), Dkk1 (320 ng/ml; all from R&DSystems), and <strong>FGF</strong>2 (100 ng/ml; Invitrogen). Soluble <strong>FGF</strong> receptors(all from R&D Systems) were first used to achieve <strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> ligandsspecific for both b and c splice forms by mix<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>FGF</strong>R1IIIc, s<strong>FGF</strong>R2IIIb,and l s<strong>FGF</strong>R4 (12, 8 and 24 ng/ml, respectively). To achieve selective<strong>in</strong>hibition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> b or c splice form specific <strong>FGF</strong>s we mixed s<strong>FGF</strong>R1IIIband s<strong>FGF</strong>R2IIIb (both at 250 ng/ml) or s<strong>FGF</strong>R1IIIc and s<strong>FGF</strong>R4 (both at250 ng/ml), respectively. The medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>FGF</strong>2 or s<strong>FGF</strong>Rs wassupplemented with 10 μg/ml heparan sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 μMSB431542 (Inman et al., 2002), 10 μM SU5402 or 100 nM PD173074(Calbiochem). The <strong>cells</strong> were cultured for up to 7 days and <strong>the</strong>medium was changed daily, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> second day <strong>of</strong><strong>differentiation</strong>. It should be noted that our B27 supplement conta<strong>in</strong>ret<strong>in</strong>yl acetate which is a precursor dur<strong>in</strong>g RA syn<strong>the</strong>sis. However,experiments us<strong>in</strong>g B27 supplement without ret<strong>in</strong>yl acetate (Invitrogen)did not affect <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> activ<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>duced Sox17-GFP Hiendodermal <strong>cells</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>differentiation</strong> <strong>of</strong> day 5 activ<strong>in</strong>-<strong>in</strong>ducedcultures was done by 3 days <strong>of</strong> additional culture <strong>in</strong> serum-freemedium (KO-DMEM, N2, B27, 0.1 mM nonessential am<strong>in</strong>o acids, 2 mML-glutam<strong>in</strong>e, Penicill<strong>in</strong>/Streptomyc<strong>in</strong>, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol)supplemented with Wnt3a (5 ng/ml), <strong>FGF</strong>4 (10 ng/ml) and/or0.1 μM all-trans ret<strong>in</strong>oic acid (Sigma).Differentiation <strong>in</strong> embryoid bodies (EBs) was carried out us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>hang<strong>in</strong>g drop method. Cells were dissociated to s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>cells</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g nonenzymaticCell Dissociation Solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and diluted <strong>in</strong>N2B27 medium conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relevant growth factors to yield100 <strong>cells</strong> per 20 μl drop. Approximately 150 drops were applied to<strong>the</strong> lid <strong>of</strong> a 14 cm cell culture dish (Nunc), and placed upside downover autoclaved Millipore water. Drops were left overnight and EBswere washed down with HBSS w/o Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ and left tosediment for 3–4 m<strong>in</strong> before remov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> supernatant andtransferr<strong>in</strong>g EBs to 50 mm Petri dishes (Steril<strong>in</strong>) conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g N2B27medium with <strong>the</strong> relevant growth factors. The medium was changeddaily. We frequently observed that 3–5 <strong>in</strong>dividual aggregates wouldform <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hang<strong>in</strong>g drop yield<strong>in</strong>g aggregates composed <strong>of</strong> 20–30<strong>cells</strong>.Flow cytometryThe <strong>cells</strong> were dissociated <strong>in</strong> 0.05% Tryps<strong>in</strong>-EDTA (Invitrogen) anda percentage <strong>of</strong> GFP + <strong>cells</strong> was analyzed on a FACSCalibur flowcytometer (BD Biosciences) at days 2–6 <strong>in</strong> at least three <strong>in</strong>dependentexperiments. Mean % GFP + <strong>cells</strong>±standard deviation (S.D.) wascalculated and statistical analyses were performed us<strong>in</strong>g a two-tailedStudent's t-test for paired samples, unless we had a clear expectation<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>in</strong> which case a one-tailed test was used. Sort<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>GFP + <strong>cells</strong> for RNA extraction was performed on a FACSAria (BDBiosciences). CXCR4 expression was analyzed on a FACSCalibur flowcytometer us<strong>in</strong>g a human anti-CXCR4 monoclonal antibody (MAB172;R&D Systems). Cells were dissociated us<strong>in</strong>g Collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 m<strong>in</strong>. The cell suspension was fixed and sta<strong>in</strong>ed asdescribed below without permeabilization. Visual <strong>in</strong>spection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>cells</strong> by confocal microscopy confirmed surface localization <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> antigen.Immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence and X-gal sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gThe <strong>cells</strong> were cultured on gelat<strong>in</strong>-coated chamber slides for 3, 5 or8 days and fixed at room temperature for 30 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 4% formaldehydesolution (Mall<strong>in</strong>ckrodt Baker) for immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence or 5 m<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>0.2% glutaraldehyde for X-gal sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. For immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence, <strong>the</strong><strong>cells</strong> were permeabilized <strong>in</strong> graded ethanol followed by block<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>10% donkey serum for 1 h and <strong>in</strong>cubation with primary antibody for1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C. The follow<strong>in</strong>g antibodieswere used: goat anti-Foxa2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), goat anti-T(R&D Systems), rat anti-E-cadher<strong>in</strong> (E-cad; Zymed/Invitrogen), goatanti-Sox17 (R&D Systems), Alexa 448 conjugated rabbit anti-GFP(Molecular Probes/Invitrogen), rabbit anti-β-galactosidase (MPBiomedicals), rabbit anti-Lhx1 (Chemicon), goat and rabbit anti-Pdx1 (a k<strong>in</strong>d gift from C. Wright), <strong>mouse</strong> and rabbit anti-Nkx6-1(Jensen et al., 1996; Pedersen et al., 2006), rabbit anti-Sox2(Chemicon) and <strong>mouse</strong> anti-Cdx2 (BioGenex). The <strong>cells</strong> were<strong>in</strong>cubated with Cy2-, Cy3-, Texas Red- or Cy5-conjugated species-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!