10.07.2015 Views

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

FGF-signalling in the differentiation of mouse ES cells towards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The pluripotent stateThe pluripotency <strong>of</strong> <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> along with <strong>the</strong>ir capability to self-renew <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itely are <strong>the</strong> mostimportant characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong>. The pluripotent state is characterised morphologically bytightly associated <strong>cells</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rounded clusters. Molecularly, <strong>the</strong>y are characterised by <strong>the</strong>expression <strong>of</strong> markers, some <strong>of</strong> which are found also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICM <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g embryo. Themost commonly used are Oct4, Nanog, Stage specific embryonic antigen-1 (SSEA-1), Sox2 andAlkal<strong>in</strong>e phosphatase (Solter and Knowles 1978; Pease et al. 1990; Nichols et al. 1998; Avilion etal. 2003; Chambers et al. 2003; Mitsui et al. 2003). To test if <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> have ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>irpluripotency over time when <strong>in</strong> culture, <strong>the</strong>y are evaluated <strong>in</strong> several ways, each provid<strong>in</strong>g a morestr<strong>in</strong>gent test but at <strong>the</strong> same time tak<strong>in</strong>g more resources. They can be evaluated by i)morphology; ii) a positive sta<strong>in</strong> with antibodies for <strong>the</strong> pluripotent markers; iii) subcutaneous<strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong> mice and formation <strong>of</strong> teratomes with <strong>cells</strong> <strong>of</strong> all three germ layers; iv) <strong>in</strong>jection <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> ICM <strong>of</strong> a develop<strong>in</strong>g embryo where <strong>the</strong>y give rise to chimaeras with contributions to tissues <strong>of</strong>all three germ layers and <strong>the</strong> germ l<strong>in</strong>e (Ohtsuka and Dalton 2008). The last test is considered <strong>the</strong>‘golden standard’ but is time-consum<strong>in</strong>g and is <strong>the</strong>refore not rout<strong>in</strong>ely carried out except <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>establishment and analysis <strong>of</strong> newly generated transgenic cell l<strong>in</strong>es or by <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g whe<strong>the</strong>r acerta<strong>in</strong> (manipulated) <strong>ES</strong> cell l<strong>in</strong>e is entirely pluripotent.Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pluripotent state <strong>in</strong> an <strong>ES</strong> cell culture is done through prevention <strong>of</strong><strong>differentiation</strong> (or <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>of</strong> self-renewal properties) and promotion <strong>of</strong> proliferation. LIF isadded to <strong>the</strong> culture medium <strong>of</strong> pluripotent <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> and is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> factor <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g<strong>cells</strong> pluripotent (Figure 1-4A). It activates <strong>the</strong> JAK/STAT3-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> pathway, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>transcription <strong>of</strong> genes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> self-renewal, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se be<strong>in</strong>g C-myc (Niwa et al. 1998;Cartwright et al. 2005). LIF also activates <strong>the</strong> important Phospho<strong>in</strong>ositol 3 k<strong>in</strong>ase (PI3K), lead<strong>in</strong>gto activation <strong>of</strong> Ras/ mitogen-activated prote<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ase (MAPK) and AKT pathways. The latter is<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> relief <strong>of</strong> C-myc repression by glycogen synthase k<strong>in</strong>ase-3 (GSK-3), which seems to bevery important <strong>in</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g self-renewal capability (Umehara et al. 2007). BMP is a secondimportant factor for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g self-renewal, its effect possibly depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> cultureconditions <strong>in</strong> which it acts (Ohtsuka and Dalton 2008). BMP activates SMAD1/5/8-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g to expression <strong>of</strong> Inhibitor <strong>of</strong> <strong>differentiation</strong> (Id)-genes which block at least neural<strong>differentiation</strong> (Figure 1-4A; (Y<strong>in</strong>g et al. 2003a)). BMPs also act by suppress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> p38 MAPK,which would o<strong>the</strong>rwise promote <strong>differentiation</strong> (Qi et al. 2004; Kunath et al. 2007). <strong>FGF</strong>4 isexpressed <strong>in</strong> pluripotent <strong>ES</strong> <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong> an autocr<strong>in</strong>e fashion and <strong>the</strong> activation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ERK1/2-<strong>signall<strong>in</strong>g</strong> cascade by <strong>FGF</strong> must be suppressed <strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>cells</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plupipotent state(Ma et al. 1992; Kunath et al. 2007; Nichols et al. 2009). The LIF-gp130 receptor complex sees tothis.12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!