98withdrawal of a total sum of Rs. 67,00,000=00 approximately. Although,withdrawal amount is much less amount in comparison to other cases but inspite of that in the interest of justice lenient view cannot be taken. It is amatter of illegal withdrawal of Government money.Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case andconsidering the nature of offences, convict Braj Bhushan Prasad is here<strong>by</strong>convicted and sentenced U/Ss. 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A of the I.P.C. readwith Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code to undergo RigorousImprisonment for a period of five (5) years and also to pay a fine ofRs.5,00,000=00 (Five lakhs) and in default of payment of fine he shallfurther undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six (6) months.He is further sentenced U/Sec. 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of thePrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for aperiod of two (2) years and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000=00 (One lakh)and in default of payment of fine he undergo Simple Imprisonment for aperiod of three (3) months.Convict Erick Kerketta is here<strong>by</strong> sentenced U/Ss. 420, 467, 468, 471,477-A of the I.P.C. read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code toundergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four (4) years and also topay a fine of Rs.4,00,000=00 (Four lakhs) and in default of payment of finehe shall further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of five (5)months.He is further sentenced U/Sec. 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of thePrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for aperiod of one (1) year and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000=00 (One lakh)and in default of payment of fine he undergo Simple Imprisonment for aperiod of three (3) months.Convict Bimal Kant Das is here<strong>by</strong> sentenced U/Ss. 420, 467, 468,471, 477-A of the I.P.C. read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Codeto undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four (4) years and also topay a fine of Rs.5,00,000=00 (Five lakhs) and in default of payment of finehe shall further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six (6) months.He is further sentenced U/Sec. 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of thePrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a
99period of one (1) year and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000=00 (One lakh)and in default of payment of fine he undergo Simple Imprisonment for aperiod of three (3) months.Convict Krishna Murari Sah is here<strong>by</strong> sentenced U/Ss. 420, 467, 468,471, 477-A of the I.P.C. read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Codeto undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four (4) years and also topay a fine of Rs.1,00,000=00 (One lakh) and in default of payment of fine heshall further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three (3) months.He is further sentenced U/Sec. 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of thePrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for aperiod of one (1) year and also to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000=00 (fiftythousand) and in default of payment of fine he undergo SimpleImprisonment for a period of two (2) months.Convict Sudarshan Ram is here<strong>by</strong> sentenced U/Ss. 420 the I.P.C. readwith Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code to undergo RigorousImprisonment for a period of four (4) years and also to pay a fine ofRs.2,00,000=00 (Two lakh) and in default of payment of fine he shall furtherundergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of three (3) months.He is further sentenced U/Sec. 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of thePrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for aperiod of one (1) year and also to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000=00 (fiftythousand) and in default of payment of fine he undergo SimpleImprisonment for a period of two (2) months.Convict Vijay Kumar is here<strong>by</strong> sentenced U/Ss. 420 of the I.P.C. readwith Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code to undergo RigorousImprisonment for a period of three (3) years and also to pay a fine of Rs.50,000=00 (Fifty thousand) and in default of payment of fine he shall furtherundergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of two (2) months.He is further sentenced U/Sec. 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of thePrevention of Corruption Act, 1988 to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for aperiod of one (1) year and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000=00 (Five thousand)and in default of payment of fine he undergo Simple Imprisonment for aperiod of one (1) month.
- Page 1 and 2:
District-Ranchi Dated Ranchi the da
- Page 3 and 4:
324. Smt. Chanchala Sinha,Proprieto
- Page 5 and 6:
5(i) Accused Braj Bhushan Prasad st
- Page 7 and 8:
7nineteen) during the years 1990-91
- Page 9 and 10:
9Godda and dishonestly received the
- Page 11 and 12:
11Husbandry Office, Godda and disho
- Page 13 and 14:
13then becomes the responsibility o
- Page 15 and 16:
15to the first hand information of
- Page 17 and 18:
1702. 1991-92 Rs.1,55,000=00 Rs.42,
- Page 19 and 20:
19P.W. 18 Ramji Rai, Retired Inspec
- Page 21 and 22:
21P.W. 82 Bhola Nath Choudhury, Emp
- Page 23 and 24:
232/376 to 2/396 PW3 Voucher(21) an
- Page 25 and 26:
252/1130 Patna2/1131 to2/11392/1140
- Page 27 and 28:
273/28 PW3 Bill No. 334(C)/91-923/2
- Page 29 and 30:
293/106 PW3 Bill No. 132(C)/95-963/
- Page 31 and 32:
3113/2 PW3DAHO, SahabganjApproved R
- Page 33 and 34:
3315/65 PW9015/66 to 15/74 PW9015/7
- Page 35 and 36:
3525/7 to 25/8 PW20 2 Sub allotment
- Page 37 and 38:
3735 PW39 Partnership Deed36 to 36/
- Page 39 and 40:
3998/153 to98/16598/166 to98/18598/
- Page 41 and 42:
41that on fake allotment letters ex
- Page 43 and 44:
43allotted to DAHO, Sahebganj out o
- Page 45 and 46:
45his deposition he has given full
- Page 47 and 48: 47Treasury after making entries in
- Page 49 and 50: 49the Treasury it was his duty to d
- Page 51 and 52: 51persons. They have prepared forge
- Page 53 and 54: 53P.W. 59 Dr. Dhanik Lal Mandal, TV
- Page 55 and 56: 55In this respect, P.W. 23 Dr. Dula
- Page 57 and 58: 57Gupta, Accountant, Sahebganj Trea
- Page 59 and 60: 59P.W. 4 Satya Sadhan Chatterjee is
- Page 61 and 62: 61this Accountant but under conspir
- Page 63 and 64: 63informed the CBI that M/s Bihar S
- Page 65 and 66: 65name of his firm M/s Samarpan Vet
- Page 67 and 68: 67Husbandry Office, Sahebganj in th
- Page 69 and 70: 69In this respect, P.W. 16 Arun Kum
- Page 71 and 72: 71This accused has stated in this d
- Page 73 and 74: 73Authority, Patna in R.C. 45/96, S
- Page 75 and 76: 75The Account was opened in the nam
- Page 77 and 78: 77manufacturing medicine which was
- Page 79 and 80: 79that from the year 1990-96 no one
- Page 81 and 82: 8133. Accused Smt. Chanchala Sinha
- Page 83 and 84: 83any Branch at Sahebganj for carry
- Page 85 and 86: 85Officer-in-Charge Town P.S. Saheb
- Page 87 and 88: 87In the above circumstances, I fin
- Page 89 and 90: 89infirmities and discrepancies. He
- Page 91 and 92: 91has been shown by the Suppliers f
- Page 93 and 94: 93the firm was opened in his name b
- Page 95 and 96: 95Considering all these evidences,
- Page 97: 97sons are unemployed and pension i
- Page 101 and 102: 101Rigorous Imprisonment for a peri
- Page 103 and 104: 103he shall further undergo Simple