Fooder scam Judgement given by Sri G. K. Singh Spl. Judge VII CBI ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

9451. Accused Phul Singh, Proprietor of M/s Gauri Distributors,Bhagalpur. His partner convict Sushil Kumar Jha has confessed his guilt andaccordingly he was convicted on plead guilty. According to the prosecutionevidence without supply of medicine he prepared fake vouchers from Ext.2/1306 to 2/1312 and on the basis of fake vouchers in connivance with otherco-accused persons under conspiracy fake Bill Ext. 3/142 was prepared anda total sum of Rs. 34,937=00 was withdrawn from the GovernmentTreasury. The medicine companies have deposed against him.Considering all the evidences, I find and hold the accused Phul Singhguilty and convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections 420, 467,468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.52. Accused Arun Kumar Singh was Partner of M/s VishwakarmaAgency, Deoghar. He prepared fake vouchers from Ext. 2/1313 to 2/1314and fake bills was prepared as Ext. 3/143 and a total sum of Rs. 7,000=00was illegally withdrawn from the Government Treasury. Being a partner heis liable for any act of his firm. There is no merit in his defence that thefather of accused Shesh Muni Ram namely Shivram Raj was actual workingpartner and he was not a real beneficiary. The amount was withdrawn byhim and deposited in his Bank Account. The medicine companies havedeposed against him that no any supply order was received from the DistrictAnimal Husbandry Office, Sahebganj. His firm was also not authorizedagent. They have also deposed that the Batch number of medicine, whichhave been mentioned in the vouchers have not been supplied to them.Considering all the evidences, I find and hold the accused ArunKumar Singh guilty and convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read withSections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.53. Accused Surendra Nath Sinha was Managing Director of M/sInter Pharmaceutical (P) Ltd., Patna and accused Basant Kumar Sinha wasDirector of the said firm. By this firm without supply of medicine fakevouchers from Ext. 2/873 to 2/893 were prepared and on the basis of thesefake vouchers, fake Bills were prepared from Ext. 3/86 to 3/88 and a totalsum of Rs. 97,313=00 was illegally withdrawn from the GovernmentTreasury by this firm.
95Considering all these evidences, I find and hold both the accusedpersons Surendra Nath Sinha and Basant Kumar Sinha guilty and convict forthe offence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of theIndian Penal Code.54. Accused Ajit Kumar Varma was proprietor of M/s Little OakPharmaceuticals Limited. Without supply of medicine fake vouchers fromExt. 2/807 to 2/872 were prepared by him and on the basis of these fakevouchers, fake Bills from Ext. 3/75 to 3/85 were prepared and a total sum ofRs. 6,09,959=00 was illegally withdrawn from the Government Treasury.Considering all these evidences, I find and hold the accused AjitKumar Varma guilty and convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read withSections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.55. Accused Smt. Chanchal Sinha was proprietor of M/s MagadhChemical Works, Patna and accused Rabindra Prasad, husband of accusedSmt. Chanchala Sinha was the Manager of the said firm. This firm hasprepared and filed fake vouchers from Ext. 2/1278 to 2/1291 without supplyof any medicine. On the basis of these fake vouchers, fake bills from Ext.3/137 to 3/138 were prepared and a total sum of Rs. 85,443=00 was illegallywithdrawn from the Government Treasury and deposited in the BankAccount of this firm. This firm was not an approved firm by CentralPurchase Committee for supply of medicine in the Animal HusbandryDepartment.Considering all these evidences, I find and hold both the accusedpersons Smt. Chanchala Sinha and Rabindra Prasad guilty and convict forthe offence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of theIndian Penal Code.56. Accused Dayanand Prasad Kashyap was proprietor of M/sBaishnav Enterprises, Ranchi. By this firm without supply of medicineforged vouchers from Ext. 2 to 2/316 were prepared and with connivancewith other co-accused persons under conspiracy fake Bills from Ext. 3 to3/32 were passed for a total sum of Rs. 14,19,840=00. This amount wasdeposited in the Bank Account of this firm. This firm was not an approvedfirm by the Ext. 13/1 the prosecution witnesses owner of the trucks have
Page 1 and 2:
District-Ranchi Dated Ranchi the da
Page 3 and 4:
324. Smt. Chanchala Sinha,Proprieto
Page 5 and 6:
5(i) Accused Braj Bhushan Prasad st
Page 7 and 8:
7nineteen) during the years 1990-91
Page 9 and 10:
9Godda and dishonestly received the
Page 11 and 12:
11Husbandry Office, Godda and disho
Page 13 and 14:
13then becomes the responsibility o
Page 15 and 16:
15to the first hand information of
Page 17 and 18:
1702. 1991-92 Rs.1,55,000=00 Rs.42,
Page 19 and 20:
19P.W. 18 Ramji Rai, Retired Inspec
Page 21 and 22:
21P.W. 82 Bhola Nath Choudhury, Emp
Page 23 and 24:
232/376 to 2/396 PW3 Voucher(21) an
Page 25 and 26:
252/1130 Patna2/1131 to2/11392/1140
Page 27 and 28:
273/28 PW3 Bill No. 334(C)/91-923/2
Page 29 and 30:
293/106 PW3 Bill No. 132(C)/95-963/
Page 31 and 32:
3113/2 PW3DAHO, SahabganjApproved R
Page 33 and 34:
3315/65 PW9015/66 to 15/74 PW9015/7
Page 35 and 36:
3525/7 to 25/8 PW20 2 Sub allotment
Page 37 and 38:
3735 PW39 Partnership Deed36 to 36/
Page 39 and 40:
3998/153 to98/16598/166 to98/18598/
Page 41 and 42:
41that on fake allotment letters ex
Page 43 and 44: 43allotted to DAHO, Sahebganj out o
Page 45 and 46: 45his deposition he has given full
Page 47 and 48: 47Treasury after making entries in
Page 49 and 50: 49the Treasury it was his duty to d
Page 51 and 52: 51persons. They have prepared forge
Page 53 and 54: 53P.W. 59 Dr. Dhanik Lal Mandal, TV
Page 55 and 56: 55In this respect, P.W. 23 Dr. Dula
Page 57 and 58: 57Gupta, Accountant, Sahebganj Trea
Page 59 and 60: 59P.W. 4 Satya Sadhan Chatterjee is
Page 61 and 62: 61this Accountant but under conspir
Page 63 and 64: 63informed the CBI that M/s Bihar S
Page 65 and 66: 65name of his firm M/s Samarpan Vet
Page 67 and 68: 67Husbandry Office, Sahebganj in th
Page 69 and 70: 69In this respect, P.W. 16 Arun Kum
Page 71 and 72: 71This accused has stated in this d
Page 73 and 74: 73Authority, Patna in R.C. 45/96, S
Page 75 and 76: 75The Account was opened in the nam
Page 77 and 78: 77manufacturing medicine which was
Page 79 and 80: 79that from the year 1990-96 no one
Page 81 and 82: 8133. Accused Smt. Chanchala Sinha
Page 83 and 84: 83any Branch at Sahebganj for carry
Page 85 and 86: 85Officer-in-Charge Town P.S. Saheb
Page 87 and 88: 87In the above circumstances, I fin
Page 89 and 90: 89infirmities and discrepancies. He
Page 91 and 92: 91has been shown by the Suppliers f
Page 93: 93the firm was opened in his name b
Page 97 and 98: 97sons are unemployed and pension i
Page 99 and 100: 99period of one (1) year and also t
Page 101 and 102: 101Rigorous Imprisonment for a peri
Page 103 and 104: 103he shall further undergo Simple
show all

Fooder scam Judgement given by Sri G. K. Singh Spl. Judge VII CBI ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?