Fooder scam Judgement given by Sri G. K. Singh Spl. Judge VII CBI ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

92illegally withdrawn from the Government Treasury. The said amount wasdeposited in his Bank Account by pay-in-slip. Further this firm has notreceived any supply order from the Animal Husbandry Department. Thefirm was also not an authorized firm by the Central Purchase Committee.The prosecution has succeeded to prove his case against this accused.Considering the prosecution evidences, I find and hold the accusedSushil Kumar Sinha guilty and convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B readwith Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.Accused Sunil Kumar Sinha has also presented fake vouchers fromExt. 2/1215 to 2/1277 and fake Bills were prepared from Ext. 3/127 to3/136. He has withdrawn a total sum of Rs. 2,46,603=37 from theGovernment Treasury.Considering all these evidences, I find and hold the accused SunilKumar Sinha guilty and convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read withSections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.47. Accused Smt. Sarswati Chandra was proprietor of M/s S.R.Enterprises, Patna and her husband accused Mahendra Prasad is the Managerof M/s S.R. Enterprises, Patna. Without supply of medicines they haveproduced fake vouchers from Ext. 2/615 to 2/806 and fake Bills wereprepared from Ext. 3/55 to 3/74. On the basis of these fake Bills, they havereceived Rs. 9,51,639=26 in the name of their firm M/s S.R. Enterprises,Patna.Considering all these evidences, I find and hold both the accusedpersons Sarswati Chandra and Mahendra Prasad guilty and convict for theoffence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IndianPenal Code.48. Accused Sanjay Kumar Agrawal was proprietor of M/s SanjayCattle Feeds & General Supplier, Dumka. Without supply of Barseem Seedhe presented fake vouchers in Animal Husbandry Department from Ex.t2/397 to 2/514 and fake Bills from Ext. 3/37 to 3/46 were prepared andpresented for withdrawals of Government money. A total sum of Rs.6,00,000=00 was withdrawn from the Government Treasury. It is hisdefence that he was a servant of Shesh Muni Ram and under his direction
93the firm was opened in his name but this defence cannot be consideredbecause the firm was running in his name and he used to sign on all therelevant papers on behalf of the firm.On the basis of prosecution evidences, which have already beendiscussed earlier, I find and hold the accused Sanjay Kumar Agrawal guiltyand convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections 420, 467, 468,471 of the Indian Penal Code.49. Accused Ram Avtar Sharma was proprietor of M/s TriptiAgency. He prepared and presented fake vouchers from Ext. 2/555 to 2/614without supply of medicine and on the basis of fake vouchers, fake Billsfrom Ext. 3/47 to 3/54 were prepared and a total sum of Rs. 4,99,599=00was withdrawn by him and deposited in his Bank Account. The medicinecompanied have deposed against him that no any supply order was receivedfrom District Animal Husbandry Office, Sahebganj and they have notsupplied any medicine to him and he was not an authorized agent of themedicine company. His firm was also not authorized by the CentralPurchase Committee.Considering all the prosecution evidences and considering thecircumstances, I find and hold the accused Ram Avtar Sharma guilty andconvict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471of the Indian Penal Code.50. Accused Gopi Nath Das, was proprietor of M/s RadhaPharmecy, Dumka. He presented fake vouchers from Ext. 2/1299 to 2/1305without supply of medicine. On the basis of forged vouchers underconspiracy with other co-accused persons forged Bills Ext. 3/141 wasprepared and passed by the Treasury Officer, Sahebganj, for a sum of Rs.31,512=00. This amount was withdrawn by the Cheque No. 580588 dated14.3.92. The medicine company has deposed that they have not received anysupply order from the District Animal Husbandry Office, Sahebganj and thisfirm was not authorized agent of the medicine company. The Batch Numberin vouchers have also denied by the medicine company.Considering all the evidences, I find and hold the accused GopiNath Das guilty and convict for the offence U/Sec. 120-B read with Sections420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
Page 1 and 2:
District-Ranchi Dated Ranchi the da
Page 3 and 4:
324. Smt. Chanchala Sinha,Proprieto
Page 5 and 6:
5(i) Accused Braj Bhushan Prasad st
Page 7 and 8:
7nineteen) during the years 1990-91
Page 9 and 10:
9Godda and dishonestly received the
Page 11 and 12:
11Husbandry Office, Godda and disho
Page 13 and 14:
13then becomes the responsibility o
Page 15 and 16:
15to the first hand information of
Page 17 and 18:
1702. 1991-92 Rs.1,55,000=00 Rs.42,
Page 19 and 20:
19P.W. 18 Ramji Rai, Retired Inspec
Page 21 and 22:
21P.W. 82 Bhola Nath Choudhury, Emp
Page 23 and 24:
232/376 to 2/396 PW3 Voucher(21) an
Page 25 and 26:
252/1130 Patna2/1131 to2/11392/1140
Page 27 and 28:
273/28 PW3 Bill No. 334(C)/91-923/2
Page 29 and 30:
293/106 PW3 Bill No. 132(C)/95-963/
Page 31 and 32:
3113/2 PW3DAHO, SahabganjApproved R
Page 33 and 34:
3315/65 PW9015/66 to 15/74 PW9015/7
Page 35 and 36:
3525/7 to 25/8 PW20 2 Sub allotment
Page 37 and 38:
3735 PW39 Partnership Deed36 to 36/
Page 39 and 40:
3998/153 to98/16598/166 to98/18598/
Page 41 and 42: 41that on fake allotment letters ex
Page 43 and 44: 43allotted to DAHO, Sahebganj out o
Page 45 and 46: 45his deposition he has given full
Page 47 and 48: 47Treasury after making entries in
Page 49 and 50: 49the Treasury it was his duty to d
Page 51 and 52: 51persons. They have prepared forge
Page 53 and 54: 53P.W. 59 Dr. Dhanik Lal Mandal, TV
Page 55 and 56: 55In this respect, P.W. 23 Dr. Dula
Page 57 and 58: 57Gupta, Accountant, Sahebganj Trea
Page 59 and 60: 59P.W. 4 Satya Sadhan Chatterjee is
Page 61 and 62: 61this Accountant but under conspir
Page 63 and 64: 63informed the CBI that M/s Bihar S
Page 65 and 66: 65name of his firm M/s Samarpan Vet
Page 67 and 68: 67Husbandry Office, Sahebganj in th
Page 69 and 70: 69In this respect, P.W. 16 Arun Kum
Page 71 and 72: 71This accused has stated in this d
Page 73 and 74: 73Authority, Patna in R.C. 45/96, S
Page 75 and 76: 75The Account was opened in the nam
Page 77 and 78: 77manufacturing medicine which was
Page 79 and 80: 79that from the year 1990-96 no one
Page 81 and 82: 8133. Accused Smt. Chanchala Sinha
Page 83 and 84: 83any Branch at Sahebganj for carry
Page 85 and 86: 85Officer-in-Charge Town P.S. Saheb
Page 87 and 88: 87In the above circumstances, I fin
Page 89 and 90: 89infirmities and discrepancies. He
Page 91: 91has been shown by the Suppliers f
Page 95 and 96: 95Considering all these evidences,
Page 97 and 98: 97sons are unemployed and pension i
Page 99 and 100: 99period of one (1) year and also t
Page 101 and 102: 101Rigorous Imprisonment for a peri
Page 103 and 104: 103he shall further undergo Simple
show all

Fooder scam Judgement given by Sri G. K. Singh Spl. Judge VII CBI ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?