Fooder scam Judgement given by Sri G. K. Singh Spl. Judge VII CBI ...

64Drafts issued by his branch i.e. from Ext. 30/68 to 30/71; Ext. 30/77, Ext.30/92, Ext.30/93, Ext. 30/105 to 30/108. He further proved Ext. 16/12 i.e.also a seizure memo by the order of Manager of State Bank of India MainBranch, he handed over the certified copies of Bank Documents related toM/s Mastrin Pharmaceuticals Limited, Patna; M/s Samarpan VeterinaryEnterprises, Patna; M/s Bihar Surgico Medico Agency, Patna; and M/s S.R.Enterprises, Patna and the said seizure memo was prepared in respect ofthose Bank Documents.P.W. 55 Vijay Kumar Mishra, General Manager, State Bank of India,Main Branch, Patna. In para-5 he proved Ext. 31/8, Ext. 38/2 and Ext. 32/7that are Account Opening Form, Specimen signature, Chart of statement ofAccounts respectively. He also proved Pay-in-Slip i.e. Ext. 29/39. Furtherhe proved, in para-7, the Account Opening Form and statement of Accountof M/s Mastrin Pharmaceuticals Limited i.e. Ext. 31/9 and Ext. 32/8. Furtherhe proved Pay-in-Slip Ext. 29/42, in respect of Current Account No. 178belongs to M/s Mastrin Pharmaceuticals Limited. In para-12 he furtherproved Account Opening Form and Statement of Accounts of M/s BiharSurgico Medico Agency, Patna related to his S.B.I. Account No. 118, thathas been marked as Ext. 31/12 and 32/11 respectively.22. In respect of accused Sushil Kumar Sinha, according to theprosecution case he was Proprietor of M/s Samarpan Veterinary Enterprises,Patna. It is alleged that without supply of medicine he prepared forged andfake vouchers. Further with conspiracy of District Animal HusbandryOffice, Sahebagnaj and T.V.O (M) Sahebganj and also with conspiracy ofTreasury Officers, Sahebaganj and employees of Sahebganj Treasury forgedbills were prepared and on the basis of forged and fake vouchers governmentmoney was withdrawn to the extent of Rs. 8,24,826=10 (Rupees Eight lakhsTwenty-four thousand Eight hundred Twenty-six and paise ten). The Bankdrafts was received for the said amount and it was deposited in the BankAccount of the said firm.On behalf of the prosecution the alleged fake and forgedvouchers have been proved from Ext. 2/894 to Ext. 2/1065. According tothe prosecution case, all these vouchers were prepared by this accused in the