Fooder scam Judgement given by Sri G. K. Singh Spl. Judge VII CBI ...

6020. In respect of accused Ashok Kumar Ghosh, AccountantSahebganj Treasury and accused Shailendra Kumar Mishra, AccountantSahebganj Treasury, according to the prosecution case Ashok Kumar Ghoshduring 1991 to 1996 while functioning as Accountant in Sahebganj Treasuryprepared all the Bills of AHD Suppliers involved in this case without raisingany question about the allotment, though it was unusually high. He preparedas many as six (6) vouchers of Rs. 4.5 lakhs in a single day i.e. 6.7.1991.Fifteen (15) vouchers involving Rs. 7,00,000=00 in a single day i.e.2.3.1992. Eleven (11) vouchers involving Rs. 4,00,000=00 in a single dayi.e. 7.3.1992. Twenty-five (25) vouchers involving lakhs of rupees in asingle day i.e. 14.3.1992. In some of the Bills detailed classification has notbeen given but in spite of that Bills were not sent back to the D.D.Os forclarification.In respect of accused Shailendra Kumar Mishra in the samemanner, prosecution case is that while functioning as Accountant, SahebganjTreasury during September to November 1995 prepared eleven (11) Bills ofAHD Suppliers involved in this case worth Rs. 5.5 lakhs without raising anyquestion about the allotment. The Bills were not in order and having severaldiscrepancies.In respect of Ashok Kumar Ghosh, it appears from perusal ofExt. 3, Ext. 3/103, Ext. 3/105, Ext. 3/118, Ext. 3/121 to 3/123, Ext. 3/127 to3/132; Ext. 3/134 to 3/136 and Ext. 3/139 to 3/146 that discrepancies havebeen apparent on Bills but in spite of that these Bills were presented beforethe Treasury Officer for withdrawals of amount. All the Bills exceeded tofinancial power of the D.D.Os of Rs. 5,000=00 per day. On several Bills,there is no any certificate has been given about the receiving of materials orgoods. In some of the Bills detail classification has also not been mentionedbut in spite of that these Bills were presented before the TreasuryAccountant for presenting the Bills for withdrawals of amount. The sanctionorder is Ext. 28/3 against this accused.In respect of accused Shailendra Kumar Mishra Ext. 3/104, Ext.3/119, Ext. 3/120, Ext. 3/124, Ext. 3/125, Ext. 3/126, Ext. 3/133, Ext. 3/137and Ext. 3/138 have been proved by the prosecution that bills were seen by