6Corruption Act, 1988. In respect of this accused the defalcated amount inquestion is a total sum of Rs. 6, 74,989=22 (Rupees Six lakhs Seventy-fourthousand Nine hundred Eighty-nine and paise twenty-two) during the years1990-91 to 1992-93 and 1995-96 from the Sahebganj Treasury, Governmentof Bihar.(vi) Accused Vijay Kumar stands charged U/Ss. 420 of the Indian PenalCode and U/Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In respectof this accused the defalcated amount in question is a total sum of Rs.44,43,782=00 (Rupees Forty-four lakhs forty-three thousand seven hundredEighty-two) during the years 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1995-96 from theSahebganj Treasury, Government of Bihar.(vii) Accused S.N. Jha stands charged U/Ss. 420 of the Indian Penal Codeand U/Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In respect ofthis accused the defalcated amount in question is a total sum of Rs.96,604=76 (Rupees Ninty-six thousand Six hundred four and paise seventysix)during the years 1991-92 to 1995-96 from the Sahebganj Treasury,Government of Bihar.(viii) Accused Alok Kumar Gupta stands charged U/Ss. 420 of the IndianPenal Code and U/Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Inrespect of this accused the defalcated amount in question is a total sum ofRs.79,54,428=37 (Rupees Seventy-nine lakhs fifty-four thousand fourhundred twenty-eight and paise thirty-seven) during the years 1990-91 to1992-93 and 1995-96 from the Sahebganj Treasury, Government of Bihar.(ix) Accused Ashok Kumar Ghosh stands charged U/Ss. 420 of the IndianPenal Code and U/Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Inrespect of this accused the defalcated amount in question is a total sum ofRs.74,84,009=00 (Rupees Seventy-four lakhs Eighty-four thousand nine)during the years 1990-91 to 1992-93 and 1995-96 from the SahebganjTreasury, Government of Bihar.(x) Accused Shailendra Kumar Mishra stands charged U/Ss. 420 of theIndian Penal Code and U/Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,1988. In respect of this accused the defalcated amount in question is a totalsum of Rs. 4,70,419=00 (Rupees Four lakhs Seventy thousand Fur hundred
7nineteen) during the years 1990-91 to 1992-93 and 1995-96 from theSahebganj Treasury, Government of Bihar.(xi) Accused Tripurari Mohan Prasad, Proprietor of M/s Bihar SurgicoMedico Agency, Patna and M/s Mastrin Pharmaceutical, Patna standscharged U/Ss. 420, 467, 468, 471of the Indian Penal Code. In respect of thisaccused the defalcated amount in question is a total sum of Rs.25,48,168=00 <strong>by</strong> submitting 19 (nineteen) numbers of fake, forged andfabricated Bills and Supply Orders to Animal Husbandry Department,Godda and dishonestly received the said amount during the year 1990-91,1991-92 and 1995-96.(xii) Accused Sushil Kumar Sinha, Proprietor of M/s SamarpanEnterprises, Patna stands charged U/Ss. 420, 467, 468, 471of the IndianPenal Code. In respect of this accused the defalcated amount in question is atotal sum of Rs. 8,24,826=01=00 <strong>by</strong> submitting 20 (Twenty) numbers offake, forged and fabricated Bills and Supply Orders to Animal HusbandryDepartment, Godda and dishonestly received the said amount during theyear 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1995-96 at Sahebganj, Dumka, Patna and otherplaces of Bihar.(xiii) Accused Sunil Kumar Sinha, Proprietor of M/s Baba ChemicalWorks, Patna stands charged U/Ss. 420, 467, 468, 471of the Indian PenalCode. In respect of this accused the defalcated amount in question is a totalsum of Rs. 2,46,603=37 <strong>by</strong> submitting 8 (Eight) numbers of fake, forged andfabricated Bills and Supply Orders to Animal Husbandry Department,Godda and dishonestly received the said amount without effecting supplyduring the year 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1995-96 at Sahebganj, Dumka, Patnaand other places of Bihar.(xiv) Accused Smt. Sarswati Chandra, Proprietor of M/s S. R. Enterprisesstands charged U/Ss. 420, 467, 468, 471of the Indian Penal Code. In respectof this accused the defalcated amount in question is a total sum of Rs.9,51,639=26 <strong>by</strong> submitting 20 (Twenty) numbers of fake, forged andfabricated Bills and Supply Orders to District Animal Husbandry Office,Godda and dishonestly received the said amount without effecting the
- Page 1 and 2: District-Ranchi Dated Ranchi the da
- Page 3 and 4: 324. Smt. Chanchala Sinha,Proprieto
- Page 5: 5(i) Accused Braj Bhushan Prasad st
- Page 9 and 10: 9Godda and dishonestly received the
- Page 11 and 12: 11Husbandry Office, Godda and disho
- Page 13 and 14: 13then becomes the responsibility o
- Page 15 and 16: 15to the first hand information of
- Page 17 and 18: 1702. 1991-92 Rs.1,55,000=00 Rs.42,
- Page 19 and 20: 19P.W. 18 Ramji Rai, Retired Inspec
- Page 21 and 22: 21P.W. 82 Bhola Nath Choudhury, Emp
- Page 23 and 24: 232/376 to 2/396 PW3 Voucher(21) an
- Page 25 and 26: 252/1130 Patna2/1131 to2/11392/1140
- Page 27 and 28: 273/28 PW3 Bill No. 334(C)/91-923/2
- Page 29 and 30: 293/106 PW3 Bill No. 132(C)/95-963/
- Page 31 and 32: 3113/2 PW3DAHO, SahabganjApproved R
- Page 33 and 34: 3315/65 PW9015/66 to 15/74 PW9015/7
- Page 35 and 36: 3525/7 to 25/8 PW20 2 Sub allotment
- Page 37 and 38: 3735 PW39 Partnership Deed36 to 36/
- Page 39 and 40: 3998/153 to98/16598/166 to98/18598/
- Page 41 and 42: 41that on fake allotment letters ex
- Page 43 and 44: 43allotted to DAHO, Sahebganj out o
- Page 45 and 46: 45his deposition he has given full
- Page 47 and 48: 47Treasury after making entries in
- Page 49 and 50: 49the Treasury it was his duty to d
- Page 51 and 52: 51persons. They have prepared forge
- Page 53 and 54: 53P.W. 59 Dr. Dhanik Lal Mandal, TV
- Page 55 and 56: 55In this respect, P.W. 23 Dr. Dula
- Page 57 and 58:
57Gupta, Accountant, Sahebganj Trea
- Page 59 and 60:
59P.W. 4 Satya Sadhan Chatterjee is
- Page 61 and 62:
61this Accountant but under conspir
- Page 63 and 64:
63informed the CBI that M/s Bihar S
- Page 65 and 66:
65name of his firm M/s Samarpan Vet
- Page 67 and 68:
67Husbandry Office, Sahebganj in th
- Page 69 and 70:
69In this respect, P.W. 16 Arun Kum
- Page 71 and 72:
71This accused has stated in this d
- Page 73 and 74:
73Authority, Patna in R.C. 45/96, S
- Page 75 and 76:
75The Account was opened in the nam
- Page 77 and 78:
77manufacturing medicine which was
- Page 79 and 80:
79that from the year 1990-96 no one
- Page 81 and 82:
8133. Accused Smt. Chanchala Sinha
- Page 83 and 84:
83any Branch at Sahebganj for carry
- Page 85 and 86:
85Officer-in-Charge Town P.S. Saheb
- Page 87 and 88:
87In the above circumstances, I fin
- Page 89 and 90:
89infirmities and discrepancies. He
- Page 91 and 92:
91has been shown by the Suppliers f
- Page 93 and 94:
93the firm was opened in his name b
- Page 95 and 96:
95Considering all these evidences,
- Page 97 and 98:
97sons are unemployed and pension i
- Page 99 and 100:
99period of one (1) year and also t
- Page 101 and 102:
101Rigorous Imprisonment for a peri
- Page 103 and 104:
103he shall further undergo Simple