Ralgro Detailer - Merck Animal Health

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Steers RALGRO vs. Synovex ® -SIntact HeifersRALGRO vs. Compudose ®0 5 10 15 20 25 1 2 3 4Total Added Weight, lbs.Total Added Weight, lbs.Additional weight gain produced bya single RALGRO implant vs. no implantAdditional weight gain with RAvs. Synovex ® -S and CompudRALGROSynovex ® -CWhy RALGRO0 285 288RALGRO vs. SynoProven ReliabilityRalgro is the only implant containing zeranol – a safe and effectiveanabolic agent. Ralgro is designed to stimulate the animal’s pituitarygland for increased feed efficiency and weight gain.Proven ROIWeaning weights of calves implanted with Ralgro can increaseas much as 20-35 pounds compared to non-implanted cattle.That increase can make a significant impact to your bottom line.A California study evaluated 11 years of premiums and discountsfor value-added calves at auction. Non-implanted or “natural” calvesbrought in less than a $1 difference per hundredweight (cwt) comparedto implanted calves.For example:• A non-implanted calf weighing 550 lbs x $120/cwt = $660• An implanted calf weighing 571 lbs x $119/cwt = $679.50As research indicates, the implanted calf gives you an advantageof nearly $20 per head.Even in markets where Intact non-implanted Heifers cattle are sold at a premium,the Ralgro advantage still comes out ahead.Proven VersatilityZeranol is not sex-specific, which Total Added makes Weight, Ralgro lbs. one of the fewimplants that can be used Additional in both weight steers gain and produced heifers. bya single RALGRO implant vs. no implantA single Ralgro implant given at the beginning of grazing increasedaverage daily gain (ADG) by:• .20 lb each in 5,871 steers – 21 lbs added weight gain over 105 days• .09 lb each in 1,789 intact heifers – 12 lbs added weight gainover 137 daysSignificant ResultsRalgro has been tested in 53 trials with 4,070 suckling calves.Compared to the closest competitor, Ralgro calves averageda three pound gain over Synovex-C calves – a $3.00 per headdifference at $100/cwt.The right choice makes a serious difference to your profit potential.Make sure you use the best.Increase0ImplantHormonal/AnabolicResponseGrazing PeriodLevel ofNutritionIllustration of good fit betweenanabolic stimulus and level of nutritionSteersIntact HeifersSteers RALGRO vs. Synovex ® -SRALGRO vs. Compudose 0 5 10 15 20 25Total Added Weight, lbs.0 5 10 15 20 25 1 2Additional weight gain produced bya single 3 RALGRO 4 implant 5 vs. no implantTotal Added Weight, lbs.Additional weight gain with RALGROvs. Synovex ® -S and Compudose ®RALGROSynovex ® -C0 285 288 291 294 297PoundsRALGRO vs. Synovex-C in Suckling CalvesaseRRHormonRespon
Ralgro: The Inside TruthNot everyone understands the science behind implants.Since confusion can often lead to mismanagement andpoor results, Ralgro encourages transparency aboutthese products. Here are the leading misconceptionsof implant use, and the truths behind them.1.2.“There is no perceived benefit to implants.”TRUTH:A lack of perceived benefits mostly stems from alack of forage nutrients. Lean growth has a higherpriority than fat, resulting in higher initial nutrientdemand. Without proper forage, marbling, fat andoverall output can suffer.The research is clear. Hundreds of implant studieshave been conducted on stocker cattle, indicatinga response of 15-20% increase in ADG, regardlessof basal rate of gain.“Hormonal implants are unnatural.”TRUTH:Ralgro implants stimulate the production ofsomatotropin, a natural growth-producing agent.In steers, these hormones are lost during castration.Nothing is produced in the animal that does notoccur naturally.These hormone messages optimize nutrientdemands to lean tissue over external fat to createresults naturally found in larger frame scorebulls and heifers. For example, a frame eightsteer will finish about 200 pounds heavier thana frame five steer, simply because it has highermessenger hormones.3.The change to the animal’s growth curve is basedon three factors: age, genetics, and caloric intake.For implants to be effective and produce results,these factors must be established first.“Implanted calves don’t benefit as muchfrom subsequent implants.”TRUTH:Ralgro implants have no effect on an animal’sresponse to succeeding hormone enhancements.Ralgro optimizes smaller-framed steers in relationto their age. Pre-harvest growth enhancements willwork just as they would in non-implanted steers.4. “Implants cost too much.”TRUTH:Weaning weights of both steer and heifer calveshave been increased as much as 20-35 poundscompared to non-implanted cattle. This weightgain typically exceeds the “premiums” oftenattributed to implant-free calves.In fact, few technologies have the potential returnon investment as growth-promoting implants.As long as they are properly managed, implantshave a proven return on investment.As demand for high quality beef continues torise, proper implanting methods will only becomemore important.
Page 4: For more information on how to opti

Ralgro Detailer - Merck Animal Health

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?