Bull's Head and Mermaid - The Bernstein Project - Österreichische ...
Bull's Head and Mermaid - The Bernstein Project - Österreichische ...
Bull's Head and Mermaid - The Bernstein Project - Österreichische ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
watermark may well have belonged to the same ream of<br />
leaves <strong>and</strong> were probably used by the same artist or his<br />
workshop within a rather short period.<br />
Datable paper may provide insights in a given paper<br />
br<strong>and</strong> used by an artist, could help establish a chronology<br />
of works, verify authenticity, <strong>and</strong> highlight workshop practices.<br />
<strong>The</strong> uncertain attribution of a drawing to an artist<br />
when the drawing contains a particular watermark which is<br />
already known from a certain work by the same artist may<br />
give additional support to the attribution of the uncertain<br />
work.<br />
As paper-leaves used for drawings by an artist have often<br />
been cut into various pieces, registering the characteristics<br />
of one piece of paper with a drawing by the artist may be a<br />
starting point for recognizing other pieces of paper with<br />
drawings that have belonged to the same leaf <strong>and</strong> even the<br />
same ream of leaves. Many of the so-called “peintregraveurs”<br />
such as Albrecht Dürer, Parmigianino <strong>and</strong> Rembr<strong>and</strong>t<br />
made prints as well as drawings. Sometimes their<br />
prints are dated. If the paper of these prints has identical<br />
watermarks, they may well help establishing dates <strong>and</strong> authenticity<br />
of undated prints <strong>and</strong> drawings by the same artist<br />
<strong>and</strong> his workshop <strong>and</strong> of the relationship among print impressions.<br />
Some watermarks may be typical for a certain<br />
year or period.<br />
For all these reasons a large set of data <strong>and</strong> images of<br />
watermarks <strong>and</strong> paper-leaves would provide a fundamental<br />
instrument for the study of prints <strong>and</strong> drawings, i.e. for the<br />
art history scholar, for museum staff, for collectors, <strong>and</strong><br />
for art dealers. In the past watermarks have been regularly<br />
retrieved for research. <strong>The</strong>y are usually hidden in<br />
individual catalogues if published at all or otherwise held<br />
closed by the owners’ institutions of the art works. <strong>The</strong><br />
database of the Dutch Institute in Florence now under construction<br />
will offer the great advantage of a centralized collection<br />
of large quantities of watermark material. Its cumulative<br />
effect will be an essential surplus value to its<br />
clients/users.<br />
Example of a watermark in an etching<br />
by Rembr<strong>and</strong>t:<br />
<strong>The</strong> Foolscap watermark (Ill. 5) has been found in many<br />
variants in paper of etchings produced by Rembr<strong>and</strong>t. This<br />
variant (foolscap, collar with seven points, long loose hair,<br />
small balls at the lower side of the collar-points <strong>and</strong> below)<br />
is for example present in a number of etchings from the<br />
years 1639 until 1642, such as those illustrated in illustrations<br />
6 <strong>and</strong> 7, the first one approximately datable 1639 <strong>and</strong><br />
the second one signed <strong>and</strong> dated 1642.<br />
44<br />
Example of a watermark in Michelangelo<br />
A watermark with an eagle (Briquet 89; here ill. 8) found in<br />
a drawing of fortifications (Florence, Casa Buonarroti<br />
inv.no. 27a, De Tolnay Corpus no.567; ill. 9) is identical to<br />
the watermark recently found in a study of fortifications attributed<br />
until now to the school of Michelangelo (Florence,<br />
Casa Buonarroti, inv. no. 12a, De Tolnay Corpus 565; ill.<br />
10). <strong>The</strong> discovery of the identity of these watermarks provides<br />
an excellent argument to reconsider whether the second<br />
drawing is in fact by an artist of Michelangelo’s school<br />
or rather by an artist active in the workshop, or by<br />
Michelangelo himself.<br />
Selective Bibliography: Ash / Fletcher, Watermarks in<br />
Rembr<strong>and</strong>t’s Prints; Boorsch et al., exhibition catalogue;<br />
Filedt Kok et al., Jan Muller as Printmaker; Griffiths, On<br />
Some Albums; Griffiths / Hartley, Watermarks; Hinterding,<br />
Rembr<strong>and</strong>t als etser; Hinterding, Rembr<strong>and</strong>t as an etcher;<br />
La Chapelle, Michel-Ange; La Chapelle et al., Les filigranes;<br />
La Chapelle et al., Les relevés de filigranes; Lanfiuti Baldi,<br />
Contributo alla conoscenza; Lanfiuti Baldi, La cattura di<br />
Cristo di Dürer; Lunning, Characteristics of Italian paper;<br />
Meijer, An International Database; Roberts, Dictionary<br />
1998; Woodward, Catalogue of Watermarks.<br />
Ill. 8: Watermark, “Eagle” (Briquet 89)<br />
Watermarks <strong>and</strong> Musicology<br />
B.W.M. (B.W.M. / L.D.)<br />
More than any other field of historical study, musicology<br />
has found the additional information that can be gained by<br />
research on paper <strong>and</strong> watermarks of inordinate value. A<br />
detailed survey of the results that such research can bring<br />
has already been published by Frederick Hudson in 1987,<br />
<strong>and</strong> it is thus unnecessary to go into great detail in this regard<br />
here. <strong>The</strong> significance of such research <strong>and</strong> documentation<br />
activities can be seen in the special watermark volumes<br />
that are part of the complete works of Bach, published<br />
in 1985 by Wisso Weiß in co-operation with