Bull's Head and Mermaid - The Bernstein Project - Österreichische ...
Bull's Head and Mermaid - The Bernstein Project - Österreichische ...
Bull's Head and Mermaid - The Bernstein Project - Österreichische ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Ill. 3: AT 5000-315_302 AT 5000-680_36 AT 5000-680_4<br />
was not exactly the same as where it had previously been<br />
sewn or soldered. It also happened that single elements of<br />
a wire figure fell off the mould <strong>and</strong> were not re-attached,<br />
or that a wire figure was repaired only provisionally <strong>and</strong> so<br />
continued to become more <strong>and</strong> more deformed. A variant<br />
could also be formed by a wire figure, which had become<br />
loose, being removed from the mould completely <strong>and</strong> then<br />
re-attached, possibly inverted, at another spot. As a result,<br />
one finds sheets of paper in which their watermarks differ<br />
to varying degrees, although they were made with the<br />
same paper mould.<br />
At first glance it is often not possible to say whether two<br />
watermarks are identical, variants or marks from different<br />
paper moulds. Drawings are usually too inexact to determine<br />
whether the differences between two figures are a result<br />
of the figure having changed or the drawing being inaccurate.<br />
Since not only the drawing itself, but also the<br />
placement of the mark on the screen must be taken into<br />
consideration, variants can only be established by means of<br />
photography. Photo software makes it possible to lay<br />
scanned photos with different degrees of transparency on<br />
top of one another, which allows even subtle differences to<br />
be visible.<br />
To classify undated paper chronologically, it is clear that<br />
such variants are useful since they originate from the same<br />
paper mould. Relevant for dating paper based on their watermarks<br />
is the length of time such a mould was used, not<br />
the condition of the wire figure attached to the mould.<br />
What is decisive is that variants are recognized as such, <strong>and</strong><br />
are not treated as if they were differing marks, as they<br />
would then be lost for a dating process.<br />
Ill. 3 depicts the watermark “Moor’s head with crown<br />
(<strong>and</strong> additional motif circle)” in three variants, although it is<br />
not possible to determine an unambiguous logical order for<br />
the watermark’s development. <strong>The</strong> wire figure was attached<br />
to the paper mould very well. One finds only a slight defor-<br />
38<br />
mation in AT5000–680_4 at the lower part of the head, to<br />
the right of the circle. Probably the adjacent circle was<br />
added later, only after the screen had been in use for some<br />
time, or it was a replacement for a circle that was lost. This<br />
is indicated by the fact that its wire is less carefully bent<br />
than that of the Moor’s head, as well as the fact that it is<br />
rather coarsely mounted, as can be seen by the clearly visible<br />
sewing wire. Whether the two variants of the circle are<br />
one <strong>and</strong> the same circle, or whether a new circle was attached<br />
later also cannot be said with certainty. Only the differences<br />
can be noted with certainty: the circle of<br />
AT5000–680_4 is farther left, in the shape of a ring, <strong>and</strong><br />
attached at three points; that of AT5000–680_36, in contrast,<br />
clearly shows four sewing points, is more oval, <strong>and</strong><br />
the wire is broken at its upper right.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Bull’s head in Ill. 4 shows how many variants of one<br />
watermark could arise. Several parts of the wire figure<br />
moved over the time the mould was in use: the eyes, for<br />
example, were shifted to the right. One also sees striking<br />
changes in the horns. <strong>The</strong>y gradually shift to the right <strong>and</strong><br />
differ greatly in width. <strong>The</strong> cross, which forms the upper<br />
part of the watermark, must have broken loose several<br />
times <strong>and</strong> was repeatedly re-attached in a makeshift manner,<br />
only to become loose again <strong>and</strong> be sewn to yet another<br />
new position. <strong>The</strong> outline of the head <strong>and</strong> ears, in contrast,<br />
was attached so well to the laid <strong>and</strong> chain lines that<br />
its position did not change.<br />
Literature: Haidinger, Datieren mittelalterlicher H<strong>and</strong>schriften<br />
mittels ihrer Wasserzeichen; Gerardy, Datieren mit<br />
Hilfe von Wasserzeichen; Gerardy, Das Papier der Seckelmeisterrechnungen,<br />
72ff.; Piccard, Die Wasserzeichenkartei<br />
im Hauptstaatsarchiv Stuttgart Bd.2/1–3: Die Ochsenkopfwasserzeichen,<br />
Stuttgart 1966, Bd. 2/1, 3ff.<br />
M.S. (C.P.-K.)