Part 6: Detection and Prevention of Foot Problems in Type 2 Diabetes
Part 6: Detection and Prevention of Foot Problems in Type 2 Diabetes Part 6: Detection and Prevention of Foot Problems in Type 2 Diabetes
Some ethnic groups are associated with lower socioeconomic status and some studieshave examined foot problems in relation to ethnicity. In a 2-year cohort of 1,666people (mean age 69 years; 52.0% Mexican American, 44.0% non-Hispanic whites,4.0% other ethnic group) with Type 2 diabetes (Lavery et al, 2003b), the incidence ofulceration, infection, amputation, and lower-extremity bypass was 68.4, 36.5, 5.9, and7.7 per 1,000 persons per year. The prevalence of peripheral sensory neuropathy withloss of protective sensation was 40.9% in Mexican Americans and 42.2% in non-Hispanic whites. Amputation incidence was higher in Mexican Americans than innon-Hispanic whites (7.4/1,000 v 4.1/1,000; OR 1.8, CI 1.2-2.7, p=0.003), while therewas no significant difference in the incidence of ulceration (p=0.1), foot infection(p=0.9) and lower-extremity bypass (p=0.3) between ethnic groups. MexicanAmericans were 3.8 times more likely to have a failed bypass which leaded to anamputation than non-Hispanic whites (75.0 v 44.0%; OR 3.8, CI 1.2-11.8, p=0.01).Young et al (2003) reported that individuals from certain ethnic minority groups hadan increased risk of LEA. Among 429,918 people with diabetes (mean age 64 years,97.4% male) who received primary care within the Veterans Affairs Health CareSystem, 3,289 people had an LEA during the study period (1 Oct 1997 to 10 Sept1998). Compared with people without amputation, amputees were more likely tobelong to a minority group and to have more comorbid conditions. Native Americanshad the highest risk of amputation (RR 1.74, CI 1.39-2.18), followed by AfricanAmericans (RR 1.41, CI 1.34-1.48) and Hispanics (RR 1.28, CI 1.20-1.38) comparedwith whites. Asians were more likely to have toe amputations and Native Americanswere more likely to have below-knee amputations compared with whites or otherethnicities.Karter et al (2002) reported diabetic complication rates in an ethnically diversepopulation (n=62,432) with diabetes which included Asians (12%), blacks (14%),Latinos (10), and whites (64%) in a 4-year observational study. Latinos were leastlikely (35%), followed by blacks (55%), to have more than a high school education.At baseline, self-reported peripheral neuropathy was 19% in Asians, 31% in Latinosand 32% in blacks and 32% in whites, respectively. From January 1995 to December1998, there were 574 hospitalisations for nontraumatic LEA procedures. The age- andsex-adjusted incidence rate was 10.7 (CI 9.2-12.3) per 1,000 person-years in blacks,9.2 (CI 8.6-9.9) in whites, 6.3 (CI 5.0-7.8) in Latinos and 5.9 (CI 4.7-7.2) in Asians.The incidence of LEA procedures was significantly lower in Asians than in whites,with a HR of 0.40 (CI .028-0.62); while there was no statistically significant blackwhiteand Latino-white difference for LEA (HR 0.84, CI 0.65-1.08, p=0.16; HR 0.85,CI 0.63-1.14, p=0.27).Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, a socioeconomicallydisadvantaged group, are especially likely to suffer many foot problems related todiabetes. Unfortunately there are no specific data relating to the management ofdiabetes related foot problems among socioeconomically disadvantaged people, andresearch in this area is urgently needed.98
Summary - Socioeconomic consequences• Diabetic foot problems are a major burden on the health care system and are themost common reason for hospital admissions for diabetes• Socioeconomic factors influence the occurrence of diabetes foot problems,although few studies have addressed this issue and further research is required inthis area99
- Page 48 and 49: Background - Clinical Detection of
- Page 50 and 51: pulse was bilaterally absent in 1.8
- Page 52 and 53: Evidence Table: Section 6AuthorClin
- Page 54 and 55: Background - Frequency of Foot Exam
- Page 56 and 57: Summary - Frequency of Foot Examina
- Page 58 and 59: Section 8: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 60 and 61: Behaviour assessment scores, measur
- Page 62 and 63: Mazzuca et al (1986) studies 532 pe
- Page 64 and 65: with before the programme, after 1-
- Page 66 and 67: Evidence Table: Section 8AuthorEffe
- Page 68 and 69: Background - Glycaemic Control and
- Page 70 and 71: In a previous Japanese randomised s
- Page 72 and 73: Evidence Table: Section 9AuthorGlyc
- Page 74 and 75: Background - Footwear to Reduce Ulc
- Page 76 and 77: period. In addition people without
- Page 78 and 79: Comparisons of in-shoe foot pressur
- Page 80 and 81: The rate of plantar callus formatio
- Page 82 and 83: Evidence Table: Section 10AuthorFoo
- Page 84 and 85: Background - Foot Clinics and Multi
- Page 86 and 87: A prospective non randomised contro
- Page 88 and 89: Summary - Foot Clinics and Multi-di
- Page 90 and 91: Section 12: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 92 and 93: and/or osteomyelitis; III - fore-fo
- Page 94 and 95: Summary - Economic consequences•
- Page 96 and 97: Section 13: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 100 and 101: Evidence Table: Section 13AuthorSoc
- Page 102 and 103: Calle-Pascual AL, Duran A, Diaz A,
- Page 104 and 105: Jannink MJ, van Dijk H, de Vries J,
- Page 106 and 107: Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-
- Page 108 and 109: Soulier SM, Godsey C, Asay ED, Perr
- Page 110 and 111: Diabetes Foot Problems: General Ref
- Page 112 and 113: McNeely MJ, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, St
- Page 114 and 115: Diabetes Foot Problems: Other Refer
- Page 116 and 117: Caputo GM, Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS
- Page 118 and 119: Garbalosa JC, Cavanagh PR, Wu G, Ul
- Page 120 and 121: Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich
- Page 122 and 123: Payne C. Regional variations of dia
- Page 124 and 125: Tovi J, Svanborg E, Nilsson BY, Eng
- Page 126 and 127: Criteria used to determine the suit
- Page 128 and 129: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 130 and 131: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 132 and 133: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 134 and 135: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 136 and 137: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 138 and 139: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
Some ethnic groups are associated with lower socioeconomic status <strong>and</strong> some studieshave exam<strong>in</strong>ed foot problems <strong>in</strong> relation to ethnicity. In a 2-year cohort <strong>of</strong> 1,666people (mean age 69 years; 52.0% Mexican American, 44.0% non-Hispanic whites,4.0% other ethnic group) with <strong>Type</strong> 2 diabetes (Lavery et al, 2003b), the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong>ulceration, <strong>in</strong>fection, amputation, <strong>and</strong> lower-extremity bypass was 68.4, 36.5, 5.9, <strong>and</strong>7.7 per 1,000 persons per year. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> peripheral sensory neuropathy withloss <strong>of</strong> protective sensation was 40.9% <strong>in</strong> Mexican Americans <strong>and</strong> 42.2% <strong>in</strong> non-Hispanic whites. Amputation <strong>in</strong>cidence was higher <strong>in</strong> Mexican Americans than <strong>in</strong>non-Hispanic whites (7.4/1,000 v 4.1/1,000; OR 1.8, CI 1.2-2.7, p=0.003), while therewas no significant difference <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> ulceration (p=0.1), foot <strong>in</strong>fection(p=0.9) <strong>and</strong> lower-extremity bypass (p=0.3) between ethnic groups. MexicanAmericans were 3.8 times more likely to have a failed bypass which leaded to anamputation than non-Hispanic whites (75.0 v 44.0%; OR 3.8, CI 1.2-11.8, p=0.01).Young et al (2003) reported that <strong>in</strong>dividuals from certa<strong>in</strong> ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority groups hadan <strong>in</strong>creased risk <strong>of</strong> LEA. Among 429,918 people with diabetes (mean age 64 years,97.4% male) who received primary care with<strong>in</strong> the Veterans Affairs Health CareSystem, 3,289 people had an LEA dur<strong>in</strong>g the study period (1 Oct 1997 to 10 Sept1998). Compared with people without amputation, amputees were more likely tobelong to a m<strong>in</strong>ority group <strong>and</strong> to have more comorbid conditions. Native Americanshad the highest risk <strong>of</strong> amputation (RR 1.74, CI 1.39-2.18), followed by AfricanAmericans (RR 1.41, CI 1.34-1.48) <strong>and</strong> Hispanics (RR 1.28, CI 1.20-1.38) comparedwith whites. Asians were more likely to have toe amputations <strong>and</strong> Native Americanswere more likely to have below-knee amputations compared with whites or otherethnicities.Karter et al (2002) reported diabetic complication rates <strong>in</strong> an ethnically diversepopulation (n=62,432) with diabetes which <strong>in</strong>cluded Asians (12%), blacks (14%),Lat<strong>in</strong>os (10), <strong>and</strong> whites (64%) <strong>in</strong> a 4-year observational study. Lat<strong>in</strong>os were leastlikely (35%), followed by blacks (55%), to have more than a high school education.At basel<strong>in</strong>e, self-reported peripheral neuropathy was 19% <strong>in</strong> Asians, 31% <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong>os<strong>and</strong> 32% <strong>in</strong> blacks <strong>and</strong> 32% <strong>in</strong> whites, respectively. From January 1995 to December1998, there were 574 hospitalisations for nontraumatic LEA procedures. The age- <strong>and</strong>sex-adjusted <strong>in</strong>cidence rate was 10.7 (CI 9.2-12.3) per 1,000 person-years <strong>in</strong> blacks,9.2 (CI 8.6-9.9) <strong>in</strong> whites, 6.3 (CI 5.0-7.8) <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong>os <strong>and</strong> 5.9 (CI 4.7-7.2) <strong>in</strong> Asians.The <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> LEA procedures was significantly lower <strong>in</strong> Asians than <strong>in</strong> whites,with a HR <strong>of</strong> 0.40 (CI .028-0.62); while there was no statistically significant blackwhite<strong>and</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong>o-white difference for LEA (HR 0.84, CI 0.65-1.08, p=0.16; HR 0.85,CI 0.63-1.14, p=0.27).Australia’s Aborig<strong>in</strong>al <strong>and</strong> Torres Strait Isl<strong>and</strong>er peoples, a socioeconomicallydisadvantaged group, are especially likely to suffer many foot problems related todiabetes. Unfortunately there are no specific data relat<strong>in</strong>g to the management <strong>of</strong>diabetes related foot problems among socioeconomically disadvantaged people, <strong>and</strong>research <strong>in</strong> this area is urgently needed.98