- Page 1: National Evidence Based Guidelinesf
- Page 6 and 7: • Evidence references• General
- Page 8 and 9: 2.3 Summary of RecommendationsRecom
- Page 11 and 12: 2.5 RecommendationsSection 1: Diabe
- Page 13 and 14: significantly more likely to have a
- Page 15 and 16: (VPT ≥ 25 V on at least one foot
- Page 17 and 18: Apelqvist et al (1990) studied a co
- Page 19 and 20: Evidence Table: Section 1Peripheral
- Page 21 and 22: Background - Peripheral Vascular Di
- Page 23 and 24: questionnaire two years later. Ther
- Page 25 and 26: Evidence Table: Section 2AuthorPeri
- Page 27 and 28: Background - Foot Deformity and Pre
- Page 29 and 30: Foot deformity is a risk factor for
- Page 31 and 32: with callus under the forefoot had
- Page 33 and 34: Evidence Table: Section 3AuthorDefo
- Page 35 and 36: Background - Ulcer as a Risk Factor
- Page 37 and 38: A current ulcer is a high risk indi
- Page 39 and 40: Evidence Table: Section 4AuthorUlce
- Page 41 and 42: Background - Detection of Loss of P
- Page 43 and 44: tendon reflexes (OR 6.48, CI 2.37-1
- Page 45 and 46: Summary - Detection of Loss of Prot
- Page 47 and 48: Section 6: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 49 and 50: venous filling time as significantl
- Page 51 and 52: Summary - Clinical Detection of Per
- Page 53 and 54: Section 7: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 55 and 56:
at every clinic visit, but more com
- Page 57 and 58:
• Summary Table: Section 7AuthorF
- Page 59 and 60:
Background - Patient Education and
- Page 61 and 62:
(p=0.007). The behaviour score (whi
- Page 63 and 64:
To test the hypothesis that a motiv
- Page 65 and 66:
Summary - Patient Education and Foo
- Page 67 and 68:
Section 9: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 69 and 70:
those not taking insulin (p
- Page 71 and 72:
Summary - Glycaemic Control and Per
- Page 73 and 74:
Section 10: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 75 and 76:
of the foot than men who spent 27%
- Page 77 and 78:
people who did not achieve healing
- Page 79 and 80:
unilateral ulceration and four with
- Page 81 and 82:
Summary - Footwear to Reduce Ulcera
- Page 83 and 84:
Section 11: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 85 and 86:
lesion, 10% had ulcer recurrence at
- Page 87 and 88:
and orthopaedic surgeons (Thomson e
- Page 89 and 90:
Evidence Table: Section 11AuthorFoo
- Page 91 and 92:
Background - Economic consideration
- Page 93 and 94:
widely used in Australia, only the
- Page 95 and 96:
Evidence Table: Section 12AuthorEco
- Page 97 and 98:
Background - Socioeconomic consider
- Page 99 and 100:
Summary - Socioeconomic consequence
- Page 101 and 102:
Diabetes Foot Problems: Evidence Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Edmonds ME, Blundell MP, Morris ME,
- Page 105 and 106:
LeMaster JW, Sugarman JR, Baumgardn
- Page 107 and 108:
Plank J, Haas W, Rakovac I, Gorzer
- Page 109 and 110:
Willoughby D, Burroughs D. A CNS-ma
- Page 111 and 112:
Edmonds ME, Blundell MP, Morris ME,
- Page 113 and 114:
Sugarman JR, Reiber GE, Baumgardner
- Page 115 and 116:
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel H
- Page 117 and 118:
Donaghue VM, Sarnow MR, Giurni JM,
- Page 119 and 120:
Jeffcoate W, Lima J, Nobrega L. The
- Page 121 and 122:
Miller LV, Goldstein J. More effici
- Page 123 and 124:
Rose NE, Feiwell LA, Cracchiolo A 3
- Page 125 and 126:
2.6 Diabetes Foot Problem Guideline
- Page 127 and 128:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 129 and 130:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 131 and 132:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 133 and 134:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 135 and 136:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 137 and 138:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 139:
QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN