<strong>Diabetes</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> <strong>Problems</strong>: Other ReferencesAbbott RD, Br<strong>and</strong> FN, Kannel WB. Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> some peripheral arterial f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> diabetic men<strong>and</strong> women: Experiences from the Fram<strong>in</strong>gham study. Am J Med 1990;88:376-81.Adler AI, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, Forsberg RC, Smith DG. Risk factors for diabeticperipheral sensory neuropathy. Results <strong>of</strong> the Seattle Prospective Diabetic <strong>Foot</strong> Study. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care1997;20:1162-7.Adler AI, Stevens RJ, Neil A, Stratton IM, Boulton AJM, Holman RR. UKPDS 59: hyperglycaemia<strong>and</strong> other potentially modifiable risk factors for peripheral vascular disease <strong>in</strong> <strong>Type</strong> 2 diabetes.<strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2002;25:894-9.Albert S. Cost-effective management <strong>of</strong> recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers. Cl<strong>in</strong>ics <strong>in</strong> Podiatric Medic<strong>in</strong>e<strong>and</strong> Surgery. 2002; 19: 483-91.Al-Delaimy WK, Merchant AT, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB. Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>Type</strong> 2diabetes <strong>and</strong> its duration on the risk <strong>of</strong> peripheral arterial disease among men. Am J Med2004;116:236-40.Alogna M. CDC diabetes control programs – Overview <strong>of</strong> diabetes patient education. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Educ1985;10:32-6,57.Apelqvist J, Larsson J, Agardh C-D. The importance <strong>of</strong> peripheral pulses, peripheral oedema <strong>and</strong> localpa<strong>in</strong> for the outcome <strong>of</strong> diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med 1990;7:590-4.Apelqvist J, Larsson J, Agardh C-D. Medical risk factors <strong>in</strong> diabetic patients with foot ulcers <strong>and</strong>severe peripheral vascular disease <strong>and</strong> their <strong>in</strong>fluence on outcome. J <strong>Diabetes</strong> Complications1992;6:167-74.Apelqvist J, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Larsson J, Person U. Long-term costs for foot ulcers <strong>in</strong> diabeticpatients <strong>in</strong> a multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary sett<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>Foot</strong> Ankle Int 1995;16:388-94.Ariyo AA, Thach C, Tracy R Cardiovascular Health Study Investigators. Lp(a) lipoprote<strong>in</strong>, vasculardisease, <strong>and</strong> mortality <strong>in</strong> the elderly. N Eng J Med 2003;349:2108-15.Armstrong DG. Three questions can identify ulcer risk. Podiatry Today 1998;5:34-6.Armstrong DG. The 10-g mon<strong>of</strong>ilament. The diagnostic div<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rod for the diabetic foot? <strong>Diabetes</strong>Care 2000;23:887.Armstrong DG, Abu-Rumman PL, Nixon BP, Boulton AJM. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous activity monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> personsat high risk for diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001;91:451-5.Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Outcomes <strong>of</strong> preventative care <strong>in</strong> a diabetic foot specialty cl<strong>in</strong>ic. J <strong>Foot</strong>Ankle Surg 1998;37:460-6.Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Diabetic foot ulcers: <strong>Prevention</strong>, diagnosis <strong>and</strong> classification. Am FamPhysician 1998;57:1325-32.Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Treatment-based classification system for assessment <strong>and</strong>care <strong>of</strong> diabetic feet. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996;86:311-6.Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation <strong>of</strong> a diabetic wound classification system. Thecontribution <strong>of</strong> depth, <strong>in</strong>fection, <strong>and</strong> ischemia to risk <strong>of</strong> amputation. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 1998;21:855-9.Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB, Van Houtum WH. Amputation <strong>and</strong> reamputation <strong>of</strong> thediabetic foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1997;87:255-9.114
Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Activity patterns <strong>of</strong> patients withdiabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a st<strong>and</strong>ard pressure <strong>of</strong>fload<strong>in</strong>gregimen. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2003;26:2595-7.Assal JP. A global, <strong>in</strong>tegrated approach to diabetes: A challenge for more efficient therapy.In:Davidson JK (ed). Cl<strong>in</strong>ical diabetes mellitus. A problem oriented approach. New York: Thieme:1986.Assal JP, Muhlhauser I, Pernet A, Gfeller R, Jorgens V, Berger M. Patient education as the basis fordiabetes care <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice <strong>and</strong> research. Diabetologia 1985;28:602-13.Baker N, Letherdale B. Audit <strong>of</strong> special shoes: are they be<strong>in</strong>g worn? Diabet <strong>Foot</strong> 1999;2:100-4.Bell-Krotoski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability <strong>of</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g with Semmes-We<strong>in</strong>ste<strong>in</strong> mon<strong>of</strong>ilaments. JH<strong>and</strong> Surg 1987;12:155-61.Benotmane A, Mohammedi F, Ayad F, Kadi K, Medjbeur S, Azzouz A. Management <strong>of</strong> diabetic footlesions <strong>in</strong> hospital: costs <strong>and</strong> benefits. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Metab 2001;27:688-94.Birke JA, Sims DS. Plantar sensory threshold <strong>in</strong> the ulcerative foot. Lepr Rev 1986;57:261-7.Boer H, Seydel ER. Medical op<strong>in</strong>ions, beliefs <strong>and</strong> prescription <strong>of</strong> orthopedic footwear: a survey <strong>of</strong>Dutch orthopaedists <strong>and</strong> rehabilitation practitioners. Cl<strong>in</strong> Rehabil 1998;12:245-53.Birke JA, Foto JG, Pfiefer LA. Effect <strong>of</strong> orthosis material hardness on walk<strong>in</strong>g pressure <strong>in</strong> high-riskdiabetes patients. JPO 1999;11:43-6.Boulton AJM. The diabetic foot. Med Cl<strong>in</strong> North Am 1988;72:1513-30.Boulton AJM. Why bother educat<strong>in</strong>g the multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary team <strong>and</strong> the patient - the example <strong>of</strong>prevention <strong>of</strong> lower extremity amputation <strong>in</strong> diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 1995;26:183-8.Boulton AJM. The pathogenesis <strong>of</strong> diabetic foot problems: an overview. Diabet Med 1996;13(Suppl1):S12-6.Boulton AJM. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for diagnosis <strong>and</strong> outpatient management <strong>of</strong> diabetic peripheral neuropathy.<strong>Diabetes</strong> Metab 1998;24(Suppl 3):55-65.Boulton AJM. Lower<strong>in</strong>g the risk <strong>of</strong> neuropathy, foot ulcers <strong>and</strong> amputations. Diabet Med1998;15(Suppl 4):S57-9.Bower<strong>in</strong>g CK. Diabetic foot ulcers. Pathophysiology, assessment, <strong>and</strong> therapy. Can Fam Physician2001;47:1007-16.Br<strong>and</strong> FN, Kannel WB, Evans J, Larson MG, Wolf PA. Glucose <strong>in</strong>tolerance, physical signs <strong>of</strong>peripheral artery disease, <strong>and</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular events: the Fram<strong>in</strong>gham Study. Am Heart J1998;136:919-27.Brearley S, Shearman CP, Simms MH. Peripheral pulse palpation: an unreliable physical sign. Ann RColl Surg Engl 1992;74:169-71.Brown AF, Gross AG, Gutierrez PR, Jiang L, Shapiro MF, Mangione CM. Income-related differences<strong>in</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> evidence-based therapies <strong>in</strong> older persons with diabetes mellitus <strong>in</strong> for-pr<strong>of</strong>it managedcare. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:665-70.Calle-Pascual AL, Duran A, Benedi A, Calvo MI, Charro A, Diaz JA, Calle JR, Gil E, Ibarra J,Maranes JP, Cabezas-Cerrato J. Reduction <strong>in</strong> foot ulcer <strong>in</strong>dicence: relation to compliance with aprophylactic foot care programme. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2001;24:405-7.115
- Page 1:
National Evidence Based Guidelinesf
- Page 4:
Research OfficersMs Linda SmithPodi
- Page 7 and 8:
2.2 Issues for Foot Problems in Typ
- Page 9:
• Aim to achieve the best possibl
- Page 12 and 13:
Background - Peripheral Neuropathy
- Page 14 and 15:
proportion of subjects with a durat
- Page 16 and 17:
and an OR 1.1-7.8. This study also
- Page 18 and 19:
Summary - Peripheral Neuropathy as
- Page 20 and 21:
Section 2: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 22 and 23:
predicting risk of amputation, 2.9
- Page 24 and 25:
Summary - Peripheral Vascular Disea
- Page 26 and 27:
Section 3: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 28 and 29:
Evidence - Foot Deformity and Previ
- Page 30 and 31:
people with both LJM and neuropathy
- Page 32 and 33:
Summary - Foot Deformity and Previo
- Page 34 and 35:
Section 4: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 36 and 37:
Also in the Seattle study, 67 peopl
- Page 38 and 39:
Summary - Ulcer as a Risk Factor fo
- Page 40 and 41:
Section 5: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 42 and 43:
The other frequently reported metho
- Page 44 and 45:
side; and 82% having the same resul
- Page 46 and 47:
Evidence Table: Section 5Detection
- Page 48 and 49:
Background - Clinical Detection of
- Page 50 and 51:
pulse was bilaterally absent in 1.8
- Page 52 and 53:
Evidence Table: Section 6AuthorClin
- Page 54 and 55:
Background - Frequency of Foot Exam
- Page 56 and 57:
Summary - Frequency of Foot Examina
- Page 58 and 59:
Section 8: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 60 and 61:
Behaviour assessment scores, measur
- Page 62 and 63:
Mazzuca et al (1986) studies 532 pe
- Page 64 and 65: with before the programme, after 1-
- Page 66 and 67: Evidence Table: Section 8AuthorEffe
- Page 68 and 69: Background - Glycaemic Control and
- Page 70 and 71: In a previous Japanese randomised s
- Page 72 and 73: Evidence Table: Section 9AuthorGlyc
- Page 74 and 75: Background - Footwear to Reduce Ulc
- Page 76 and 77: period. In addition people without
- Page 78 and 79: Comparisons of in-shoe foot pressur
- Page 80 and 81: The rate of plantar callus formatio
- Page 82 and 83: Evidence Table: Section 10AuthorFoo
- Page 84 and 85: Background - Foot Clinics and Multi
- Page 86 and 87: A prospective non randomised contro
- Page 88 and 89: Summary - Foot Clinics and Multi-di
- Page 90 and 91: Section 12: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 92 and 93: and/or osteomyelitis; III - fore-fo
- Page 94 and 95: Summary - Economic consequences•
- Page 96 and 97: Section 13: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 98 and 99: Some ethnic groups are associated w
- Page 100 and 101: Evidence Table: Section 13AuthorSoc
- Page 102 and 103: Calle-Pascual AL, Duran A, Diaz A,
- Page 104 and 105: Jannink MJ, van Dijk H, de Vries J,
- Page 106 and 107: Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-
- Page 108 and 109: Soulier SM, Godsey C, Asay ED, Perr
- Page 110 and 111: Diabetes Foot Problems: General Ref
- Page 112 and 113: McNeely MJ, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, St
- Page 116 and 117: Caputo GM, Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS
- Page 118 and 119: Garbalosa JC, Cavanagh PR, Wu G, Ul
- Page 120 and 121: Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich
- Page 122 and 123: Payne C. Regional variations of dia
- Page 124 and 125: Tovi J, Svanborg E, Nilsson BY, Eng
- Page 126 and 127: Criteria used to determine the suit
- Page 128 and 129: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 130 and 131: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 132 and 133: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 134 and 135: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 136 and 137: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 138 and 139: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN