Evidence Table: Section 13AuthorSocioeconomic ConsiderationsLevel <strong>of</strong> EvidenceLevel Study <strong>Type</strong>EvidenceQualityRat<strong>in</strong>gMagnitudeRat<strong>in</strong>gRelevanceRat<strong>in</strong>gKarter AJ (2002)(Adults – US)III-2 Cohort High High + MediumLavery LA (2003b)(Adults – US)III-2 Cohort High High + MediumWeng C (2000)(Adults – UK)III-2 Cohort High High + MediumYoung BA (2003)(Adults – US)III-2 Cohort High High + MediumFor magnitude rat<strong>in</strong>g:+<strong>in</strong>dicates negative effect (or impact) <strong>of</strong> lower socioeconomic status on diabetic foot disease. High = cl<strong>in</strong>ically important &statistically significant; Medium = small cl<strong>in</strong>ical importance & statistically significant; Low = no statistically significant effect.Criteria for Quality <strong>and</strong> Relevance rat<strong>in</strong>gs are detailed <strong>in</strong> Appendix 9.100
<strong>Diabetes</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> <strong>Problems</strong>: Evidence ReferencesAbbott CA, Vileikyte L, Williamson S, Carr<strong>in</strong>gton AL, Boulton AJ. Multicenter study <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidence<strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> predictive risk factors for diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration. Diabtetes Care 1998;21:1071-5.Abbott CA, Carr<strong>in</strong>gton AL, Ache H, Bath S, Every LC, Griffiths J, Hann AW, Husse<strong>in</strong> A, Jackson N,Johnson KE, Ryder CH, Tork<strong>in</strong>gton R, Van Ross ERE, Whalley AM, Widdows P, Williamson S,Boulton AJM. The North-West <strong>Diabetes</strong> <strong>Foot</strong> Care Study: <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong> risk factors for, newdiabetic foot ulceration <strong>in</strong> a community-based patients cohort. Diabet Med 2002;19:377-84.Abouaesha F, van Schie CH, Griffths GD, Young RJ, Boulton AJ. Plantar tissue thickness is related topeak plantar pressure <strong>in</strong> the high-risk diabetic foot. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2001;24:1270-4.Adler AI, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Smith DG. Lower-extremity amputation <strong>in</strong> diabetes. The <strong>in</strong>dependenteffects <strong>of</strong> peripheral vascular disease, sensory neuropathy, <strong>and</strong> foot ulcers. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care1999;22:1029-35.American <strong>Diabetes</strong> Association. Preventive foot care <strong>in</strong> diabetes. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2004;27 (Suppl1):S63-4.Apelqvist J, Larsson J, Agardh CD. The <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> external precipitat<strong>in</strong>g factors <strong>and</strong> peripheralneuropathy on the development <strong>and</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> diabetic foot ulcers. J <strong>Diabetes</strong> Complications1990;4:21-5.Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Vela SA, Quebedeaux TL, Fleischli JG. Choos<strong>in</strong>g a practical screen<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>strument to <strong>in</strong>dentify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:289-92.Armstrong DG, Nguyen HC, Lavery LA, van Schie CH, Boulton AJ, Harkless LB. Off-load<strong>in</strong>g thediabetic foot wound: a r<strong>and</strong>omised cl<strong>in</strong>ical trial. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2001;24:1019-22.Azad N, Emanuele NV, Abraira C, Henderson WG, Colwell J, Lev<strong>in</strong> SR, Nuttall FQ, Comstock JP,Saw<strong>in</strong> CT, Silbert C, Rub<strong>in</strong>o FA. The effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive glycemic control on neuropathy <strong>in</strong> the VAcooperative study on type II diabetes mellitus (VA CSDM). J <strong>Diabetes</strong> Complications 1999;13:307-13.Barth R, Campbell LV, Allen S, Jupp JJ, Chisholm DJ. Intensive education improves knowledge,compliance, <strong>and</strong> foot problems <strong>in</strong> <strong>Type</strong> 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 1991;8:111-7.Benotmane A, Mohammedi F, Ayad F, Kadi K, Medjbeur S, Azzouz A. Management <strong>of</strong> diabetic footlesions <strong>in</strong> hospital: costs <strong>and</strong> benefits. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Metab 2001;27:688-94.Bloomgarden ZT, Karmally W, Metzger MJ, Brothers M, Nechemias C, Bookman J, Faierman D,G<strong>in</strong>sberg-Fellner F, Rayfield E, Brown WV. R<strong>and</strong>omized controlled trial <strong>of</strong> diabetic patient education:improved knowledge without improved metabolic status. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 1987;10:263-72.Boulton AJ, Kubrusly DB, Bowker JH, Gadia MT, Qu<strong>in</strong>tero L, Becker DM, Skyler JS, Sosenko JM.Impaired vibratory perception <strong>and</strong> diabetic foot ulceration. Diabet Med 1986;3:335-7.Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Davignon D, Stensel V, Prigeon RL, Smith DG. Diagnositic utility <strong>of</strong> the history<strong>and</strong> physical exam<strong>in</strong>ation for peripheral vascular disease among patients with diabetes mellitus. J Cl<strong>in</strong>Epidemiol 1997;50:659-68.Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, Forsberg RC, Davignon DR, Smith DG. A prospective study <strong>of</strong> riskfactors for diabetic foot ulcers. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 1999;22:1036-42.Brown MJ, Bird SJ, Watl<strong>in</strong>g S, Kaleta H, Hayes L, Eckert S, Foyt HL. Natural progression <strong>of</strong> diabeticperipheral neuropathy <strong>in</strong> the Zenarestat study population. <strong>Diabetes</strong> Care 2004;27:1153-9.Busch K, Chantelau E. Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a new br<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> stock 'diabetic' shoes to protect ana<strong>in</strong>st diabeticfoot ulcer relapse. A prospective cohort study. Diabet Med 2003;20:665-9.101
- Page 1:
National Evidence Based Guidelinesf
- Page 4:
Research OfficersMs Linda SmithPodi
- Page 7 and 8:
2.2 Issues for Foot Problems in Typ
- Page 9:
• Aim to achieve the best possibl
- Page 12 and 13:
Background - Peripheral Neuropathy
- Page 14 and 15:
proportion of subjects with a durat
- Page 16 and 17:
and an OR 1.1-7.8. This study also
- Page 18 and 19:
Summary - Peripheral Neuropathy as
- Page 20 and 21:
Section 2: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 22 and 23:
predicting risk of amputation, 2.9
- Page 24 and 25:
Summary - Peripheral Vascular Disea
- Page 26 and 27:
Section 3: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 28 and 29:
Evidence - Foot Deformity and Previ
- Page 30 and 31:
people with both LJM and neuropathy
- Page 32 and 33:
Summary - Foot Deformity and Previo
- Page 34 and 35:
Section 4: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 36 and 37:
Also in the Seattle study, 67 peopl
- Page 38 and 39:
Summary - Ulcer as a Risk Factor fo
- Page 40 and 41:
Section 5: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 42 and 43:
The other frequently reported metho
- Page 44 and 45:
side; and 82% having the same resul
- Page 46 and 47:
Evidence Table: Section 5Detection
- Page 48 and 49:
Background - Clinical Detection of
- Page 50 and 51: pulse was bilaterally absent in 1.8
- Page 52 and 53: Evidence Table: Section 6AuthorClin
- Page 54 and 55: Background - Frequency of Foot Exam
- Page 56 and 57: Summary - Frequency of Foot Examina
- Page 58 and 59: Section 8: Diabetes Foot ProblemsIs
- Page 60 and 61: Behaviour assessment scores, measur
- Page 62 and 63: Mazzuca et al (1986) studies 532 pe
- Page 64 and 65: with before the programme, after 1-
- Page 66 and 67: Evidence Table: Section 8AuthorEffe
- Page 68 and 69: Background - Glycaemic Control and
- Page 70 and 71: In a previous Japanese randomised s
- Page 72 and 73: Evidence Table: Section 9AuthorGlyc
- Page 74 and 75: Background - Footwear to Reduce Ulc
- Page 76 and 77: period. In addition people without
- Page 78 and 79: Comparisons of in-shoe foot pressur
- Page 80 and 81: The rate of plantar callus formatio
- Page 82 and 83: Evidence Table: Section 10AuthorFoo
- Page 84 and 85: Background - Foot Clinics and Multi
- Page 86 and 87: A prospective non randomised contro
- Page 88 and 89: Summary - Foot Clinics and Multi-di
- Page 90 and 91: Section 12: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 92 and 93: and/or osteomyelitis; III - fore-fo
- Page 94 and 95: Summary - Economic consequences•
- Page 96 and 97: Section 13: Diabetes Foot ProblemsI
- Page 98 and 99: Some ethnic groups are associated w
- Page 102 and 103: Calle-Pascual AL, Duran A, Diaz A,
- Page 104 and 105: Jannink MJ, van Dijk H, de Vries J,
- Page 106 and 107: Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-
- Page 108 and 109: Soulier SM, Godsey C, Asay ED, Perr
- Page 110 and 111: Diabetes Foot Problems: General Ref
- Page 112 and 113: McNeely MJ, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, St
- Page 114 and 115: Diabetes Foot Problems: Other Refer
- Page 116 and 117: Caputo GM, Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS
- Page 118 and 119: Garbalosa JC, Cavanagh PR, Wu G, Ul
- Page 120 and 121: Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich
- Page 122 and 123: Payne C. Regional variations of dia
- Page 124 and 125: Tovi J, Svanborg E, Nilsson BY, Eng
- Page 126 and 127: Criteria used to determine the suit
- Page 128 and 129: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 130 and 131: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 132 and 133: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 134 and 135: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 136 and 137: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN
- Page 138 and 139: QUESTIONS KEY WORDS NO.ARTICLESIDEN