Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Projects Using PHOENICS - Cham

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COF Skimmer Wall During and After ConstructionDuring Skimmer Wall Construction04-2002Potential Savingabout $20 Millionsfor the next 25 yearsResultsWall Construction Finished07-2002Cost = $1.4 MillionsNo debris cleaning since theconstruction of the wall.<strong>TVA</strong> lost 0 MWh due to debrisbuildup at COF since construction.An average improvement ofabout 0.25 °F in intake watertemperature.Lower Base line 316(b) ruling
Example 2:Multi-Port Diffuser Kingston Fossil Plant
Page 1 and 2: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Pr
Page 3 and 4: Barge Collecting Debris at COF, 200
Page 5 and 6: COF Skimmer Wall Objectives• Redu
Page 7 and 8: New skimmer wall brings cool water
Page 9 and 10: Intake Channel Numerical Representa
Page 11 and 12: 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 MilesTennessee RiverN
Page 13: Computed Flow Field at COF Intake C
Page 17 and 18: (m/s)Velocity Vector taken at Sever
Page 19 and 20: Diffusers Angled at 45 degree, Inst
Page 21 and 22: Construction Started in October 200
Page 23 and 24: Example 3:Surface Water Pumps at Ti
Page 25 and 26: surface-water pumps are being Used
Page 28 and 29: Velocity Vectors (Base Case)Withdra
Page 30 and 31: Velocity Vectors with Three Pumps
Page 32: RecommendationThe option recommende

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Projects Using PHOENICS - Cham

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?