v2007.09.13 - Convex Optimization
v2007.09.13 - Convex Optimization v2007.09.13 - Convex Optimization
282 CHAPTER 4. SEMIDEFINITE PROGRAMMINGOur purpose here is to demonstrate how iteration of two simple convexproblems can quickly converge to an optimal solution of the max cutproblem with a 98% success rate, on average. 4.27 max cut is stated:maximizex∑a ij (1 − x i x j ) 1 21≤i
4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE PROGRAM 283Because an estimate of upper bound to max cut is needed to ascertainconvergence when vector x has large cardinality, we digress to derive thedual problem because it is instructive: Directly from (679), the Lagrangianis [46,5.1.5] (1219)L(x, ν) = 1 4 〈xxT , δ(A1) − A〉 + 〈ν , δ(xx T ) − 1〉= 1 4 〈xxT , δ(A1) − A〉 + 〈δ(ν), xx T 〉 − 〈ν , 1〉= 1 4 〈xxT , δ(A1 + 4ν) − A〉 − 〈ν , 1〉(680)where quadratic x T (δ(A1+ 4ν)−A)x has supremum 0 if δ(A1+ 4ν)−A isnegative semidefinite, and has supremum ∞ otherwise. The finite supremumof dual functiong(ν) = sup L(x, ν) =x{ −〈ν , 1〉 , A − δ(A1 + 4ν) ≽ 0∞otherwise(681)is chosen to be the objective of minimization to dual convex problemminimize −ν T 1νsubject to A − δ(A1 + 4ν) ≽ 0(682)whose optimal value provides a least upper bound to max cut, but isnot tight (duality gap is nonzero). [107] In fact, we find that the bound’svariance is relatively large for this problem; thus ending our digression. 4.28To transform max cut to its convex equivalent, first definethen max cut (679) becomesX = xx T ∈ S n (687)maximize1X∈ S n 4〈X , δ(A1) − A〉subject to δ(X) = 1(X ≽ 0)rankX = 1(683)4.28 Taking the dual of (682) would provide (683) but without the rank constraint. [100]
- Page 231 and 232: 4.1. CONIC PROBLEM 231faces of S 3
- Page 233 and 234: 4.1. CONIC PROBLEM 2334.1.1.3 Previ
- Page 235 and 236: 4.2. FRAMEWORK 235Equivalently, pri
- Page 237 and 238: 4.2. FRAMEWORK 237is positive semid
- Page 239 and 240: 4.2. FRAMEWORK 239Optimal value of
- Page 241 and 242: 4.2. FRAMEWORK 2414.2.3.0.2 Example
- Page 243 and 244: 4.2. FRAMEWORK 243where δ is the m
- Page 245 and 246: 4.2. FRAMEWORK 2454.2.3.0.3 Example
- Page 247 and 248: 4.3. RANK REDUCTION 2474.3 Rank red
- Page 249 and 250: 4.3. RANK REDUCTION 249A rank-reduc
- Page 251 and 252: 4.3. RANK REDUCTION 251(t ⋆ i)
- Page 253 and 254: 4.3. RANK REDUCTION 2534.3.3.0.1 Ex
- Page 255 and 256: 4.3. RANK REDUCTION 2554.3.3.0.2 Ex
- Page 257 and 258: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 259 and 260: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 261 and 262: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 263 and 264: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 265 and 266: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 267 and 268: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 269 and 270: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 271 and 272: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 273 and 274: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 275 and 276: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 277 and 278: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 279 and 280: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 281: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 285 and 286: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 287 and 288: 4.4. RANK-CONSTRAINED SEMIDEFINITE
- Page 289 and 290: Chapter 5Euclidean Distance MatrixT
- Page 291 and 292: 5.2. FIRST METRIC PROPERTIES 291cor
- Page 293 and 294: 5.3. ∃ FIFTH EUCLIDEAN METRIC PRO
- Page 295 and 296: 5.3. ∃ FIFTH EUCLIDEAN METRIC PRO
- Page 297 and 298: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 297The collecti
- Page 299 and 300: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 2995.4.2 Gram-f
- Page 301 and 302: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 301D ∈ EDM N
- Page 303 and 304: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 3035.4.2.2.1 Ex
- Page 305 and 306: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 305ten affine e
- Page 307 and 308: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 307spheres:Then
- Page 309 and 310: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 309By eliminati
- Page 311 and 312: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 311whereΦ ij =
- Page 313 and 314: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 3135.4.2.2.5 De
- Page 315 and 316: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 315105ˇx 4ˇx
- Page 317 and 318: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 317corrected by
- Page 319 and 320: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 319aptly be app
- Page 321 and 322: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 321As before, a
- Page 323 and 324: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 323where ([√t
- Page 325 and 326: 5.4. EDM DEFINITION 325because (A.3
- Page 327 and 328: 5.5. INVARIANCE 3275.5.1.0.1 Exampl
- Page 329 and 330: 5.6. INJECTIVITY OF D & UNIQUE RECO
- Page 331 and 332: 5.6. INJECTIVITY OF D & UNIQUE RECO
282 CHAPTER 4. SEMIDEFINITE PROGRAMMINGOur purpose here is to demonstrate how iteration of two simple convexproblems can quickly converge to an optimal solution of the max cutproblem with a 98% success rate, on average. 4.27 max cut is stated:maximizex∑a ij (1 − x i x j ) 1 21≤i