v2007.09.13 - Convex Optimization
v2007.09.13 - Convex Optimization v2007.09.13 - Convex Optimization
152 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY2.13.4 Discretization of membership relation2.13.4.1 Dual halfspace-descriptionHalfspace-description of the dual cone is equally simple (and extensibleto an infinite number of generators) as vertex-description (252) for thecorresponding closed convex cone: By definition (258), for X ∈ R n×N as in(240), (confer (246))K ∗ = { y ∈ R n | z T y ≥ 0 for all z ∈ K }= { y ∈ R n | z T y ≥ 0 for all z = Xa , a ≽ 0 }= { y ∈ R n | a T X T y ≥ 0, a ≽ 0 }= { y ∈ R n | X T y ≽ 0 } (315)that follows from the generalized inequality and membership corollary (277).The semi-infinity of tests specified by all z ∈ K has been reduced to a setof generators for K constituting the columns of X ; id est, the test has beendiscretized.Whenever K is known to be closed and convex, then the converse mustalso hold; id est, given any set of generators for K ∗ arranged columnarin Y , then the consequent vertex-description of the dual cone connotes ahalfspace-description for K : [245,2.8]K ∗ = {Y a | a ≽ 0} ⇔ K ∗∗ = K = { z | Y T z ≽ 0 } (316)2.13.4.2 First dual-cone formulaFrom these two results (315) and (316) we deduce a general principle:From any given vertex-description of a convex cone K , ahalfspace-description of the dual cone K ∗ is immediate by matrixtransposition; conversely, from any given halfspace-description, a dualvertex-description is immediate.Various other converses are just a little trickier. (2.13.9)We deduce further: For any polyhedral cone K , the dual cone K ∗ is alsopolyhedral and K ∗∗ = K . [245,2.8]The generalized inequality and membership corollary is discretized in thefollowing theorem [18,1] 2.49 that follows directly from (315) and (316):2.49 Barker & Carlson state the theorem only for the pointed closed convex case.
2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQUALITY 1532.13.4.2.1 Theorem. Discrete membership. (confer2.13.2.0.1)Given any set of generators (2.8.1.2) denoted by G(K) for closed convexcone K ⊆ R n and any set of generators denoted G(K ∗ ) for its dual, let xand y belong to vector space R n . Then discretization of the generalizedinequality and membership corollary is necessary and sufficient for certifyingmembership:x ∈ K ⇔ 〈γ ∗ , x〉 ≥ 0 for all γ ∗ ∈ G(K ∗ ) (317)y ∈ K ∗ ⇔ 〈γ , y〉 ≥ 0 for all γ ∈ G(K) (318)⋄2.13.4.2.2 Exercise. Test of discretized dual generalized inequalities.Test Theorem 2.13.4.2.1 on Figure 43(a) using the extreme directions asgenerators.From the discrete membership theorem we may further deduce a moresurgical description of dual cone that prescribes only a finite number ofhalfspaces for its construction when polyhedral: (Figure 42(a))K ∗ = {y ∈ R n | 〈γ , y〉 ≥ 0 for all γ ∈ G(K)} (319)2.13.4.2.3 Exercise. Comparison with respect to orthant.When comparison is with respect to the nonnegative orthant K = R n + , thenfrom the discrete membership theorem it directly follows:x ≼ z ⇔ x i ≤ z i ∀i (320)Generate simple counterexamples demonstrating that this equivalence withentrywise inequality holds only when the underlying cone inducing partialorder is the nonnegative orthant.2.13.5 Dual PSD cone and generalized inequalityThe dual positive semidefinite cone K ∗ is confined to S M by convention;S M ∗+∆= {Y ∈ S M | 〈Y , X〉 ≥ 0 for all X ∈ S M + } = S M + (321)The positive semidefinite cone is self-dual in the ambient space of symmetricmatrices [46, exmp.2.24] [28] [144,II]; K = K ∗ .
- Page 102 and 103: 102 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRYwhere
- Page 104 and 105: 104 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY√2
- Page 106 and 107: 106 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRYwhich
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY2.9.2
- Page 110: 110 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRYA con
- Page 115 and 116: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 117 and 118: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 119 and 120: 2.9. POSITIVE SEMIDEFINITE (PSD) CO
- Page 121 and 122: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 121
- Page 123 and 124: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 123
- Page 125 and 126: 2.10. CONIC INDEPENDENCE (C.I.) 125
- Page 127 and 128: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 127It follow
- Page 129 and 130: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 129Coefficie
- Page 131 and 132: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 1312.12.3 Un
- Page 133 and 134: 2.12. CONVEX POLYHEDRA 133
- Page 135 and 136: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 137 and 138: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 139 and 140: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 141 and 142: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 143 and 144: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 145 and 146: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 147 and 148: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 149 and 150: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 151: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 155 and 156: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 157 and 158: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 159 and 160: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 161 and 162: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 163 and 164: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 165 and 166: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 167 and 168: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 169 and 170: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 171 and 172: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 173 and 174: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 175 and 176: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 177 and 178: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 179 and 180: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 181 and 182: 2.13. DUAL CONE & GENERALIZED INEQU
- Page 183 and 184: Chapter 3Geometry of convex functio
- Page 185 and 186: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 185f 1 (x)f 2
- Page 187 and 188: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 1873.1.3 norm
- Page 189 and 190: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 189where the n
- Page 191 and 192: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 191where k ∈
- Page 193 and 194: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 193f(z)Az 2z 1
- Page 195 and 196: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 195{a T z 1 +
- Page 197 and 198: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 197When an epi
- Page 199 and 200: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 199orthonormal
- Page 201 and 202: 3.1. CONVEX FUNCTION 201[30,1.1] Ex
152 CHAPTER 2. CONVEX GEOMETRY2.13.4 Discretization of membership relation2.13.4.1 Dual halfspace-descriptionHalfspace-description of the dual cone is equally simple (and extensibleto an infinite number of generators) as vertex-description (252) for thecorresponding closed convex cone: By definition (258), for X ∈ R n×N as in(240), (confer (246))K ∗ = { y ∈ R n | z T y ≥ 0 for all z ∈ K }= { y ∈ R n | z T y ≥ 0 for all z = Xa , a ≽ 0 }= { y ∈ R n | a T X T y ≥ 0, a ≽ 0 }= { y ∈ R n | X T y ≽ 0 } (315)that follows from the generalized inequality and membership corollary (277).The semi-infinity of tests specified by all z ∈ K has been reduced to a setof generators for K constituting the columns of X ; id est, the test has beendiscretized.Whenever K is known to be closed and convex, then the converse mustalso hold; id est, given any set of generators for K ∗ arranged columnarin Y , then the consequent vertex-description of the dual cone connotes ahalfspace-description for K : [245,2.8]K ∗ = {Y a | a ≽ 0} ⇔ K ∗∗ = K = { z | Y T z ≽ 0 } (316)2.13.4.2 First dual-cone formulaFrom these two results (315) and (316) we deduce a general principle:From any given vertex-description of a convex cone K , ahalfspace-description of the dual cone K ∗ is immediate by matrixtransposition; conversely, from any given halfspace-description, a dualvertex-description is immediate.Various other converses are just a little trickier. (2.13.9)We deduce further: For any polyhedral cone K , the dual cone K ∗ is alsopolyhedral and K ∗∗ = K . [245,2.8]The generalized inequality and membership corollary is discretized in thefollowing theorem [18,1] 2.49 that follows directly from (315) and (316):2.49 Barker & Carlson state the theorem only for the pointed closed convex case.