who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

64in the southern part of the settlement of Komi people, and in a small region (around theriver Lupia) in the northern part. Two main types of polyphonic singing can bedistinguished in Komi-Permiak traditional music: (1) drone, and (2) variant heterophony.Drone two-part singing is spread through the most polyphonic regions of the settlementsof Komi-Permiaks (see above), and the unique feature of their drone singing is that thedrone is sung on top of the main melody (Zhulanova, 1989). Although this type of twopartsinging exist in some Russian regions (particularly in Central and South parts ofRussia), unlike Russian style, where the top drone is mostly sung by a soloist, and themain melody – by the big group, among Komi-Permiaks the drone on the top of thetexture is performed by the group of singers.Ex. 15. Komi-Permiaks. (From Nadia Zhulanova)In the middle section of the settlement of Komi-Permiaks the tradition ofpolyphony is not as prominent, as in the southern and northern regions. Drone polyphonyis absent in central regions, and the variant-heterophony is the only form of polyphony.Komi Zirians also practice mostly unison-heterophonic styles of singing, althoughZemtsovsky points at the unique tradition of “collective polyphonic wedding songlaments”among Komi-Zirians and suggests links with the Russian tradition of weddinglamentation in eastern Vologda district (Zemtsovsky, 2000:774).MariMari people consist of three ethnic groups: (1) mountain Mari live on the rightbank of river Volga, (2) so-called “meadow” Mari’s live between the rivers Vetluzhskand Viatka, and (3) “eastern” Mari live east from the river Viatka. Mari singing traditionhas long been classified as monophonic. Elements of traditional polyphony wereresearched by Oleg Gerasimov, who came to the conclusion, that variant heterophony isquite usual for Mari traditional culture, particularly in “rekrutskie” (soldier’s songs) andlyrical songs, where the large groups of singers are participating. The most interestingforms of traditional polyphony had been found among the Lugovie Mari (“meadowMari’s”). In their group singing traditions the elements of so-called podgolosochnaiapolifonia (complex version of variant heterophony, particularly widely spread amongRussians, and generally among eastern Slavs) were noted (Gerasimov, 1988:20-21).According to Gerasimov, traditional singers indicate that they prefer to sing the mainmelody in their own way, “directly” (“priamo”) creating heterophonic texture, because“it sounds better this way” (Gerasimov, 1988, 20)

65Ex. 16. Mari. (From Oleg Gerasimov)UdmurtiaUdmurts (in Old Russian “Votiaks”) are usually divided into two subgroups –northern and southern, and are ethnically close to Komi-Permiaks. There are also moredetailed ethnic divisions among Udmurts. For example, there is a specific ethnic groupBessermians in northern Udmurtia, regarded as the descendants of the medieval Bulgarsfrom banks of the Volga River. Although most of the Udmurts are Christians, there areMoslem and pagan groups among them as well. In regards of traditional polyphony, bothsouthern and northern Udmurtia have a tradition of group singing. In southern Udmurtiathe result is mostly unison and variant heterophony. In northern Udmurtia functionalpolyphony plays more distinguished role.Turkic languages are represented in Volga-Ural region by Tatars, Bashkirs andChuvashs. Generally speaking, in Volga-Ural region Turkic language speaker minoritiesare more populous than Finnish speaking minorities.TatarsTatars are easily the biggest minority group in the Volga-Ural region (about 4million population), and one of the biggest minorities in Russia. Besides the Volga – Uralregion, Tatars also live in Siberia, and around the northern tip of the Caspian Sea (socalled“Astrakhan Tatars”). More detailed division of the Tatars living in these threeregions is also available in the ethnographic literature.In regards to traditional polyphony, Tatars possibly represent the mostmonophonic musical culture in the Volga-Ural region. As far as I am aware of, only onespecific group – so-called “Christened Tatars” (“kriashennie tatari”) practice actively theunison-heterophonic type of polyphony (Almeeva, 1985). Christened Tatars are the onlyChristian group among the Moslem Tatars.Ex. 17. Tatars. (From Nailia Almeeva)

64in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>the</strong> settlement of Komi people, and in a small region (around <strong>the</strong>river Lupia) in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part. Two main types of polyphonic singing can bedistinguished in Komi-Permiak traditional music: (1) drone, and (2) variant heterophony.Drone two-part singing is spread through <strong>the</strong> most polyphonic regions of <strong>the</strong> settlementsof Komi-Permiaks (see above), and <strong>the</strong> unique feature of <strong>the</strong>ir drone singing is that <strong>the</strong>drone is sung on top of <strong>the</strong> main melody (Zhulanova, 1989). Although this type of twopartsinging exist in some Russian regions (particularly in Central and South parts ofRussia), unlike Russian style, where <strong>the</strong> top drone is mostly sung by a soloist, and <strong>the</strong>main melody – by <strong>the</strong> big group, among Komi-Permiaks <strong>the</strong> drone on <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong>texture is performed by <strong>the</strong> group of singers.Ex. 15. Komi-Permiaks. (From Nadia Zhulanova)In <strong>the</strong> middle section of <strong>the</strong> settlement of Komi-Permiaks <strong>the</strong> tradition ofpolyphony is not as prominent, as in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn and nor<strong>the</strong>rn regions. Drone polyphonyis absent in central regions, and <strong>the</strong> variant-heterophony is <strong>the</strong> only form of polyphony.Komi Zirians also practice mostly unison-heterophonic styles of singing, althoughZemtsovsky points at <strong>the</strong> unique tradition of “collective polyphonic wedding songlaments”among Komi-Zirians and suggests links with <strong>the</strong> Russian tradition of weddinglamentation in eastern Vologda district (Zemtsovsky, 2000:774).MariMari people consist of three ethnic groups: (1) mountain Mari live on <strong>the</strong> rightbank of river Volga, (2) so-called “meadow” Mari’s live between <strong>the</strong> rivers Vetluzhskand Viatka, and (3) “eastern” Mari live east from <strong>the</strong> river Viatka. Mari singing traditionhas long been classified as monophonic. Elements of traditional polyphony wereresearched by Oleg Gerasimov, <strong>who</strong> came to <strong>the</strong> conclusion, that variant heterophony isquite usual for Mari traditional culture, particularly in “rekrutskie” (soldier’s songs) andlyrical songs, where <strong>the</strong> large groups of singers are participating. The most interestingforms of traditional polyphony had been found among <strong>the</strong> Lugovie Mari (“meadowMari’s”). In <strong>the</strong>ir group singing traditions <strong>the</strong> elements of so-called podgolosochnaiapolifonia (complex version of variant heterophony, particularly widely spread amongRussians, and generally among eastern Slavs) were noted (Gerasimov, 1988:20-21).According to Gerasimov, traditional singers indicate that <strong>the</strong>y prefer to sing <strong>the</strong> mainmelody in <strong>the</strong>ir own way, “directly” (“priamo”) creating heterophonic texture, because“it sounds better this way” (Gerasimov, 1988, 20)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!