who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...
64in the southern part of the settlement of Komi people, and in a small region (around theriver Lupia) in the northern part. Two main types of polyphonic singing can bedistinguished in Komi-Permiak traditional music: (1) drone, and (2) variant heterophony.Drone two-part singing is spread through the most polyphonic regions of the settlementsof Komi-Permiaks (see above), and the unique feature of their drone singing is that thedrone is sung on top of the main melody (Zhulanova, 1989). Although this type of twopartsinging exist in some Russian regions (particularly in Central and South parts ofRussia), unlike Russian style, where the top drone is mostly sung by a soloist, and themain melody – by the big group, among Komi-Permiaks the drone on the top of thetexture is performed by the group of singers.Ex. 15. Komi-Permiaks. (From Nadia Zhulanova)In the middle section of the settlement of Komi-Permiaks the tradition ofpolyphony is not as prominent, as in the southern and northern regions. Drone polyphonyis absent in central regions, and the variant-heterophony is the only form of polyphony.Komi Zirians also practice mostly unison-heterophonic styles of singing, althoughZemtsovsky points at the unique tradition of “collective polyphonic wedding songlaments”among Komi-Zirians and suggests links with the Russian tradition of weddinglamentation in eastern Vologda district (Zemtsovsky, 2000:774).MariMari people consist of three ethnic groups: (1) mountain Mari live on the rightbank of river Volga, (2) so-called “meadow” Mari’s live between the rivers Vetluzhskand Viatka, and (3) “eastern” Mari live east from the river Viatka. Mari singing traditionhas long been classified as monophonic. Elements of traditional polyphony wereresearched by Oleg Gerasimov, who came to the conclusion, that variant heterophony isquite usual for Mari traditional culture, particularly in “rekrutskie” (soldier’s songs) andlyrical songs, where the large groups of singers are participating. The most interestingforms of traditional polyphony had been found among the Lugovie Mari (“meadowMari’s”). In their group singing traditions the elements of so-called podgolosochnaiapolifonia (complex version of variant heterophony, particularly widely spread amongRussians, and generally among eastern Slavs) were noted (Gerasimov, 1988:20-21).According to Gerasimov, traditional singers indicate that they prefer to sing the mainmelody in their own way, “directly” (“priamo”) creating heterophonic texture, because“it sounds better this way” (Gerasimov, 1988, 20)
65Ex. 16. Mari. (From Oleg Gerasimov)UdmurtiaUdmurts (in Old Russian “Votiaks”) are usually divided into two subgroups –northern and southern, and are ethnically close to Komi-Permiaks. There are also moredetailed ethnic divisions among Udmurts. For example, there is a specific ethnic groupBessermians in northern Udmurtia, regarded as the descendants of the medieval Bulgarsfrom banks of the Volga River. Although most of the Udmurts are Christians, there areMoslem and pagan groups among them as well. In regards of traditional polyphony, bothsouthern and northern Udmurtia have a tradition of group singing. In southern Udmurtiathe result is mostly unison and variant heterophony. In northern Udmurtia functionalpolyphony plays more distinguished role.Turkic languages are represented in Volga-Ural region by Tatars, Bashkirs andChuvashs. Generally speaking, in Volga-Ural region Turkic language speaker minoritiesare more populous than Finnish speaking minorities.TatarsTatars are easily the biggest minority group in the Volga-Ural region (about 4million population), and one of the biggest minorities in Russia. Besides the Volga – Uralregion, Tatars also live in Siberia, and around the northern tip of the Caspian Sea (socalled“Astrakhan Tatars”). More detailed division of the Tatars living in these threeregions is also available in the ethnographic literature.In regards to traditional polyphony, Tatars possibly represent the mostmonophonic musical culture in the Volga-Ural region. As far as I am aware of, only onespecific group – so-called “Christened Tatars” (“kriashennie tatari”) practice actively theunison-heterophonic type of polyphony (Almeeva, 1985). Christened Tatars are the onlyChristian group among the Moslem Tatars.Ex. 17. Tatars. (From Nailia Almeeva)
- Page 14 and 15: 141989:Let me briefly introduce som
- Page 16 and 17: ‣ During the last 20 years of my
- Page 18 and 19: 18Saharan African populations, than
- Page 20 and 21: and of course, Sheree Reece from th
- Page 22 and 23: 22Part 1.World stylesof traditional
- Page 24 and 25: used term, although not universally
- Page 26 and 27: 30 January, 1986). Hugh Shields gav
- Page 28 and 29: western Georgian polyphonic “trio
- Page 30 and 31: 30contains more than one compositio
- Page 32 and 33: 32rhythmic component in African mus
- Page 34 and 35: Gerhard Kubik, if you want to count
- Page 36 and 37: 36missionaries was very much aided
- Page 38 and 39: as witness recordings by barely a d
- Page 40 and 41: 40England provides an incredibly in
- Page 42 and 43: of West Africa is a well-known and
- Page 44 and 45: 44African populations played a cruc
- Page 46 and 47: 46unusual element of Tuareg culture
- Page 48 and 49: 48heterophony). European profession
- Page 50 and 51: 50famously declared that to verify
- Page 52 and 53: Out of these five main types of Rus
- Page 54 and 55: 54heterophonic and octave forms of
- Page 56 and 57: 56Ex. 3. Abkhazia. (Akhobadze, Kort
- Page 58 and 59: 58Balkarians and KarachaevisThese t
- Page 60 and 61: 60Ossetian polyphony is based on th
- Page 62 and 63: 62Garakanidze, who conducted a shor
- Page 66 and 67: 66Almeeva noted the presence of the
- Page 68 and 69: 68UkraineRegarding polyphonic singi
- Page 70 and 71: 70200), the difference between dron
- Page 72 and 73: 72BelarusBelarus is a part of the
- Page 74 and 75: 74Besides the drone and heterophoni
- Page 76 and 77: 76of the feast traditions and long
- Page 78 and 79: 78East GeorgiaEast Georgia consists
- Page 80 and 81: 80Fig. 3. Modulation from G to G# t
- Page 82 and 83: 82Polyphonic singing traditions in
- Page 84 and 85: 84In this four-part section we can
- Page 86 and 87: 86Improvisation in western Georgian
- Page 88 and 89: 88During our 1999 fieldwork in Geor
- Page 90 and 91: 90Interestingly, as Anzor Erkomaish
- Page 92 and 93: 92Different western Georgian dialec
- Page 95 and 96: 95Ex. 37. Lile. Ritual song dedicat
- Page 97 and 98: 97David Shugliashvili, both eastern
- Page 99 and 100: 99Urban MusicThe urban singing styl
- Page 101 and 102: 101Ex. 42. Suliko. Urban love song.
- Page 103 and 104: 103In Georgian traditional polyphon
- Page 105 and 106: 105BalkansThe Balkans are one of th
- Page 107 and 108: 107the tradition of polyphonic sing
- Page 109 and 110: 109It represents an interesting mix
- Page 111 and 112: 111Ex. 54. Bosnia and Herzegovina,
- Page 113 and 114: 113MacedoniaSpeaking about Macedoni
64in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>the</strong> settlement of Komi people, and in a small region (around <strong>the</strong>river Lupia) in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part. Two main types of polyphonic singing can bedistinguished in Komi-Permiak traditional music: (1) drone, and (2) variant heterophony.Drone two-part singing is spread through <strong>the</strong> most polyphonic regions of <strong>the</strong> settlementsof Komi-Permiaks (see above), and <strong>the</strong> unique feature of <strong>the</strong>ir drone singing is that <strong>the</strong>drone is sung on top of <strong>the</strong> main melody (Zhulanova, 1989). Although this type of twopartsinging exist in some Russian regions (particularly in Central and South parts ofRussia), unlike Russian style, where <strong>the</strong> top drone is mostly sung by a soloist, and <strong>the</strong>main melody – by <strong>the</strong> big group, among Komi-Permiaks <strong>the</strong> drone on <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong>texture is performed by <strong>the</strong> group of singers.Ex. 15. Komi-Permiaks. (From Nadia Zhulanova)In <strong>the</strong> middle section of <strong>the</strong> settlement of Komi-Permiaks <strong>the</strong> tradition ofpolyphony is not as prominent, as in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn and nor<strong>the</strong>rn regions. Drone polyphonyis absent in central regions, and <strong>the</strong> variant-heterophony is <strong>the</strong> only form of polyphony.Komi Zirians also practice mostly unison-heterophonic styles of singing, althoughZemtsovsky points at <strong>the</strong> unique tradition of “collective polyphonic wedding songlaments”among Komi-Zirians and suggests links with <strong>the</strong> Russian tradition of weddinglamentation in eastern Vologda district (Zemtsovsky, 2000:774).MariMari people consist of three ethnic groups: (1) mountain Mari live on <strong>the</strong> rightbank of river Volga, (2) so-called “meadow” Mari’s live between <strong>the</strong> rivers Vetluzhskand Viatka, and (3) “eastern” Mari live east from <strong>the</strong> river Viatka. Mari singing traditionhas long been classified as monophonic. Elements of traditional polyphony wereresearched by Oleg Gerasimov, <strong>who</strong> came to <strong>the</strong> conclusion, that variant heterophony isquite usual for Mari traditional culture, particularly in “rekrutskie” (soldier’s songs) andlyrical songs, where <strong>the</strong> large groups of singers are participating. The most interestingforms of traditional polyphony had been found among <strong>the</strong> Lugovie Mari (“meadowMari’s”). In <strong>the</strong>ir group singing traditions <strong>the</strong> elements of so-called podgolosochnaiapolifonia (complex version of variant heterophony, particularly widely spread amongRussians, and generally among eastern Slavs) were noted (Gerasimov, 1988:20-21).According to Gerasimov, traditional singers indicate that <strong>the</strong>y prefer to sing <strong>the</strong> mainmelody in <strong>the</strong>ir own way, “directly” (“priamo”) creating heterophonic texture, because“it sounds better this way” (Gerasimov, 1988, 20)