who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ... who asked the first question? - International Research Center For ...

10.07.2015 Views

48heterophony). European professional music (which interestingly, at thebeginning was also monophonic) turned into polyphonic by the end ofthe 1 st Millennia and had a tremendous impact on polyphonic traditionsof the European communities with its polyphonic and harmoniclanguage. This influence later extended much wider, throughout themajor regions of the world;‣ As a result of the strong influence of European professional music, theoriginal character of many European local polyphonic traditions hasbeen strongly affected, and ethnomusicologists working on localpolyphonic traditions often mention the existence of two different –“old” and “new” styles of polyphony. The most salient stylistic elementsof the “new” polyphonic style are the prevalence of parallel thirds,triadic chordal structure, and TSD (tonic-subdominant-dominant)harmonic system;‣ Quite paradoxically, although ethnomusicology started in Europe, mostof European polyphonic traditions came to the knowledge of Europeanethnomusicologists much later than the polyphonic traditions of farawayregions of the world (like sub-Saharan Africa or Polynesia). The mainreason of this paradox was the initial belief of musicologists that theirmain purpose was to study the musical traditions of non-Europeanpeoples. In fact, the name of the discipline - “ethnomusicology” was notused until the second half of 20 th century and the name “Music historyof non-European Peoples” was one of the widely used names of thesubject. Therefore, European traditional music was left without attentionof European scholars for few decades. This is the reason that unlike theAfrican and Polynesian polyphonic traditions, which came to theattention of European scholars already in the 19 th century, the richtraditions of vocal polyphony of, for example, northern Greeks andsouthern Albanians became known only during the 1950s.‣ Some of the very interesting polyphonic traditions of the Europe are inEast Europe. Western scholars were mostly unaware of the richness ofthese traditions, as the infamous “Iron Curtain” made the professionalinteraction of the ethnomusicologists from the “Western” and “Eastern”countries almost impossible for the decades. As the musicologicalresearch in developing countries were often conducted by Europeanscholars, materials from some of the “Third World” countries were morereadily available to Western scholars, than the materials from the“Second World”. [“Threefold division” of the world countries appearedafter the WW2, when free-market and Communist countries wereconsidered to be the “First” and the “Second” World countries, ledrespectively by the USA and USSR. Countries, which did not belong toany of these two “Worlds”, were considered to be the “Third World”countries. Fight for the “Third World” countries was one of the maindriving forces of the fierce and often violent military clashes betweenthe “First” and the “Second” World countries in different regions of thedeveloping world (like in Afghanistan or Vietnam)] One of the main

49aims of my survey is to make the information about the regionaltraditions of vocal polyphony from the territories of the former USSR,available to the western scholars and readers, interested in theworldwide distribution of the tradition of vocal polyphony. Unlike thesurvey of African (or later Oceanian) polyphonic cultures, wheretranscribed materials are relatively easy to access for the westernreaders, materials from former Soviet Union and the Eastern Europe aremuch more difficult to access. So, unlike the review of African andOceania polyphonic traditions, I am including quite a few musicalexamples from the Europe, and particularly from the Eastern Europeanpolyphonic traditions.I will start the review of European polyphonic traditions from the East Europe.Then we’ll move to the polyphonic traditions of South Europe (Mediterranean Basin),where we will touch some Central European polyphonic traditions as well, and finallywe’ll discuss the North European polyphonic traditions. As I have already mentioned,“pockets” of traditional vocal polyphony are represented in all of these major regions ofthe Europe.Vocal Polyphony in Eastern EuropeAccording to our current knowledge, Eastern Europe has some of the richestpolyphonic traditions of the Europe. We will discuss most of the countries and importantminorities of the Eastern Europe. We will start with three Eastern Slavic states. First wewill discuss Russia, including the numerous peoples of the Russian Federation (NorthCaucasian Ossetians, Balkarians and Karachaevis, Chechens and Ingushes, Dagestanians,Volga-Ural region peoples – Mordvinians, Komi, Udmurts, Tatars, Mari, Bashkirs,Chuvashs, speakers of Finnish languages from North Russia, as well as Jews and Rom).Then we will move to polyphonic traditions of the Ukraine, then to Belarus, and willfinish with polyphonic traditions of Georgia.RussiaEven after the break-up of the Soviet Union, Russian Federation remains easilythe largest country of our planet, comprising major parts of the East Europe and the entireNorth Asia. Regarding the sheer size of Russian Federation and the wide distribution ofethnic Russians (with subsequent close contacts with totally different cultures of Europeand Asia) it is clear that all the generalizations about Russian traditions of polyphonicsinging cannot be exhaustive. We will first discuss polyphonic traditions of ethnicRussians in both (European and Asian) regions.The study of traditional polyphony in Russia has quite an extraordinary andsomewhat paradoxical history. Today Russian traditional music is widely known for itsrich polyphony, but during the first few decades of development of Russian musicology(roughly the second part of the 19 th century) it was mostly believed that Russian musicwas monophonic. Influential Russian musical critic Vladimir Stasov (1824-1906)

48heterophony). European professional music (which interestingly, at <strong>the</strong>beginning was also monophonic) turned into polyphonic by <strong>the</strong> end of<strong>the</strong> 1 st Millennia and had a tremendous impact on polyphonic traditionsof <strong>the</strong> European communities with its polyphonic and harmoniclanguage. This influence later extended much wider, throughout <strong>the</strong>major regions of <strong>the</strong> world;‣ As a result of <strong>the</strong> strong influence of European professional music, <strong>the</strong>original character of many European local polyphonic traditions hasbeen strongly affected, and ethnomusicologists working on localpolyphonic traditions often mention <strong>the</strong> existence of two different –“old” and “new” styles of polyphony. The most salient stylistic elementsof <strong>the</strong> “new” polyphonic style are <strong>the</strong> prevalence of parallel thirds,triadic chordal structure, and TSD (tonic-subdominant-dominant)harmonic system;‣ Quite paradoxically, although ethnomusicology started in Europe, mostof European polyphonic traditions came to <strong>the</strong> knowledge of Europeanethnomusicologists much later than <strong>the</strong> polyphonic traditions of farawayregions of <strong>the</strong> world (like sub-Saharan Africa or Polynesia). The mainreason of this paradox was <strong>the</strong> initial belief of musicologists that <strong>the</strong>irmain purpose was to study <strong>the</strong> musical traditions of non-Europeanpeoples. In fact, <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> discipline - “ethnomusicology” was notused until <strong>the</strong> second half of 20 th century and <strong>the</strong> name “Music historyof non-European Peoples” was one of <strong>the</strong> widely used names of <strong>the</strong>subject. Therefore, European traditional music was left without attentionof European scholars for few decades. This is <strong>the</strong> reason that unlike <strong>the</strong>African and Polynesian polyphonic traditions, which came to <strong>the</strong>attention of European scholars already in <strong>the</strong> 19 th century, <strong>the</strong> richtraditions of vocal polyphony of, for example, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Greeks andsou<strong>the</strong>rn Albanians became known only during <strong>the</strong> 1950s.‣ Some of <strong>the</strong> very interesting polyphonic traditions of <strong>the</strong> Europe are inEast Europe. Western scholars were mostly unaware of <strong>the</strong> richness of<strong>the</strong>se traditions, as <strong>the</strong> infamous “Iron Curtain” made <strong>the</strong> professionalinteraction of <strong>the</strong> ethnomusicologists from <strong>the</strong> “Western” and “Eastern”countries almost impossible for <strong>the</strong> decades. As <strong>the</strong> musicologicalresearch in developing countries were often conducted by Europeanscholars, materials from some of <strong>the</strong> “Third World” countries were morereadily available to Western scholars, than <strong>the</strong> materials from <strong>the</strong>“Second World”. [“Threefold division” of <strong>the</strong> world countries appearedafter <strong>the</strong> WW2, when free-market and Communist countries wereconsidered to be <strong>the</strong> “First” and <strong>the</strong> “Second” World countries, ledrespectively by <strong>the</strong> USA and USSR. Countries, which did not belong toany of <strong>the</strong>se two “Worlds”, were considered to be <strong>the</strong> “Third World”countries. Fight for <strong>the</strong> “Third World” countries was one of <strong>the</strong> maindriving forces of <strong>the</strong> fierce and often violent military clashes between<strong>the</strong> “First” and <strong>the</strong> “Second” World countries in different regions of <strong>the</strong>developing world (like in Afghanistan or Vietnam)] One of <strong>the</strong> main

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!